Started By
Message

re: Watched the phantom menace for the first time in years

Posted on 10/24/15 at 2:28 am to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 2:28 am to
quote:

I still consider the prequels as a net positive for the Star Wars mythology as the movies may not be well done and have very poor execution


You're argument amounts to "I wanted pizza, and got a really crappy pizza, but it's still pizza." The classic pizza defense.

What's the point of getting a rough idea when the whole point of the prequels was to give us an actual idea? Why did I have to sit through 9 hours of movies to get a glimpse of how all those institutions of the Old Republic worked? How is that at all a net positive?
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12023 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 2:49 am to
I absolutely fricking hate George Lucas. Hate.

He's a complete piece of shite who is arrogant and completely disassociates himself with anyone who challenges his creativity.

Not only did he create an abomination of a prequel trilogy, but he's done everything he can to destroy the original trilogy because he thinks certain additions make the movies better. The changes he's made are complete crap and fans are still waiting on a remastered theatrical version of the star wars trilogy all these years later. The ghost of Hayden Christiensen appearing in the end of RotJ is one of the dumbest decisions in film history, and Lucas should have been given a lobotomy afterwards.

Hate may sound like a strong word, especially for someone who is responsible for the Star Wars universe existing in the first place, but just because you create something doesn't mean you will have its best interests in mind for the future and Lucas clearly doesn't.

The Phantom Menace was absolutely awful, and I am still trying to pick my jaw up from the floor all these years later after the realization set in that he made an even worse film with Attack of the Clones.

The entire prequel trilogy is riddled with characters we don't care about, having conversations we don't care about, involving vomit-inducing dialogue, on 95% Bluescreen/Greenscreen sets with zero life and believably. Yoda from Empire Strikes Back is one of the best characters in cinema history, and he gets completely neutered in the prequel trilogy, while all of his Jedi pals sit around and have conversations while sitting in chairs twiddling their thumbs. It's a fricking soap opera.

Why did Lucas successfully direct a good film in the original episode IV? Who knows. Maybe because his ideas weren't rushed at that point like the entire prequel trilogy. Lucas was very hands off for episode V and that was easily the best movie in the series. He started meddling with the direction of episode VI, and there was a noticeable drop off in quality from episode V, but it was still a great movie. The prequel trilogy was just rushed crap, with a director who was largely out of the game for almost 20 years. This is probably just looking into it too much though as its likely Lucas is really just a massive sellout.

Fortunately the prequel trilogy can be ignored because Disney is pretty much pretending like it doesn't exist. I just hope they have the balls to release some re-mastered original theatrical versions so I can watch some untainted star wars someday.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 3:44 am to
quote:

You're argument amounts to "I wanted pizza, and got a really crappy pizza, but it's still pizza." The classic pizza defense.



It's true.

When a pizza is good, it's pretty damn awesome and you'll remember it forever. That was the case with the originals.

When a pizza is bad, it's still decent to good but not something that keeps popping up in your head. That was the case with the prequels as I got a rough idea of what the republic looked like and I was throughly entertained. Something is better than nothing.

The prequels are not a total net loss like some hardcore fanboys would have you believe and I'm saying this someone who recognizes and validates the originals as far superior to the prequels. The prequels just get a lot of unnecessary hate, that's all.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 3:56 am to
No, I don't think they get unnecessary hate. The films aren't cogent and basically disregard characterization and narrative. That doesn't invalidate the cool stuff each of them had, but it sure makes you wonder what a cogent prequel trilogy could have been like.

Lucas knew the narrative was inherent, because the outcome was already known. Given this, it appears that he sacrificed characterization for the sake of the cool stuff or the beautiful visuals. What we wanted was a film that explored a backstory which a lot of people were invested in. What we got was a film that made that backstory seem utterly idiotic. But again, there was cool stuff in it.
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12023 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 3:59 am to
quote:

That was the case with the prequels as I got a rough idea of what the republic looked like and I was throughly entertained. Something is better than nothing.


No, no it's not. In many cases.

There are plenty stories, books, movies, video games, etc. where the backstory is hinted at but not explicitly spelled out. There is nothing wrong with leaving some things to the imagination.

quote:

Given this, it appears that he sacrificed characterization for the sake of the cool stuff or the beautiful visuals.


It was pure laziness. Lucas has admitted in documentaries that he switched to CGI due to the difficulties of building multiple sets. Not only that but he thought it was going to become an industry standard after he revolutionized it with Phantom Menace.
This post was edited on 10/24/15 at 4:14 am
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31629 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 4:23 am to
It's not all bad. There's some really bad dialogue here and there and Jar Jar is just unfathomable, but there's good stuff in there too. Attack of the Clones is much much worse.


At least Revenge of the Sith was better, still not on par with the OT, but it was a step in the right direction. The problem was Lucas. He needed to step away from the directors chair and screenplay chair. I think the prequels could be remade one day.
Posted by Das Jackal
Da Bayou
Member since Sep 2011
2600 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 7:15 am to
I'd love to see them wash away the prequel trilogy and totally redo it someday. Not sure if they'd ever do that but it would be great. Lucas made some of the worse decisions possible with them.
This post was edited on 10/24/15 at 10:39 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 7:50 am to
quote:

I think the prequels could be remade one day.



My hope is this trilogy is great and that's exactly what they do.

With the Marvel/ DC model. Putting out a movie a year planned for the next few years it would be cool to. Have starwarswdo the same and we get 5 or 6 movies the next few years.
This post was edited on 10/24/15 at 7:52 am
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15016 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 7:57 am to
The trade federation characters are such a caricature it's painful to watch.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76532 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 8:05 am to
quote:

on 95% Bluescreen/Greenscreen sets with zero life and believably.

This, and the acting, and the dialogue, were the biggest issues for me. And Jar Jar obviously.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109073 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 8:27 am to
quote:

As a movie, TPM works a lot better than Attack of the clones. I am one of the few that thinks 1 and 3 are both decent movies. Nowhere near as good as the original trilogy. But decent. 2 is absolute garbage though. And Dooku would have been an alright villain if they didnt kill him off immediately in 3 and replace him with a coughing robot. Him being Qui-Gon's master was kind of interesting but they never even delved into that.


Yeah, while I still think Episode I is terrible, II is much worse. It may be the single worst love story ever put to screen. Seriously, how the hell did Padme fall in love with this psychopath? He's just a whinny bitch who openly goes on a megalomaniacal rant about butchering women and children. Unless Padme is a depraved sadist, then their relationship makes no sense.

Plus the "droids vs clones" might be the worst idea ever for a war.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109073 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Does anyone appreciate seeing Coruscant in its full glory for the first time ever after being completely absent from the Originals except for one quick shot at the end of ROTJ,


Yeah, but they didn't follow through with it in the next 2 films. Seriously, how was Corusant remotely effected by the Clone Wars aside from that one aerial battle? It looks the exact same in Episode III. I really don't know who exactly the Clone Wars affected besides the Jedi.

quote:

what the Jedi council looked like before the Sith came to power


That was disappointing. I can understand them having a smaller base on Corusant, but you'd think their central location would be on a planet that was highly spiritually aligned with the Force. Maybe a planet that looks like Asgard from Thor. Instead they're in the middle of a big city in a giant stone building. Real creative.
This post was edited on 10/24/15 at 8:46 am
Posted by Civildawg
Member since May 2012
8596 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 8:54 am to
I can burn the despecialized editions for you if you really want to see the original theatrical versions in HD
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76532 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 9:00 am to
Well once I saw Samuel Jackson was a Jedi, no further thoughts about the Jedi were necessary.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109073 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 9:04 am to
quote:

The trade federation characters are such a caricature it's painful to watch.


The Trade Federation makes no sense. Why the hell are they working for Sidious? What could Sidious have promised them? I doubt Palpatine in Episode I was rich enough to bribe an operation of their size to risk everything for him.

And it gets even dumber in Episode II when they join Dooku in exchange for Padme's head, when she's not responsible for what happened in Episode I at all. Shouldn't a system with the Trade Federation's power be able to afford a simple assassin, and not get back on the Sith train?
Posted by Wanderin Reb
Gallifrey
Member since Jun 2013
10738 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Does anyone appreciate seeing the base version of what the Galaxy was like before the empire took over? Does anyone appreciate seeing Coruscant in its full glory for the first time ever after being completely absent from the Originals except for one quick shot at the end of ROTJ, what the Jedi council looked like before the Sith came to power, and others things we did not get the luxury of seeing in the originals?


The best depiction of that universe pre-trilogy is the game Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic. That game beats the shite out of the prequel trilogy.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103158 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 9:43 am to
These next three movies will wash away the taste of the prequels from our mouths forever and raise the bar on star wars. Empire is the only film that has a chance to be in the same class. No doubt in my mind the force awakens will be seen as on par with empire and the Rian Johnson film will surpass.
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26267 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 10:45 am to
Lucas having zero say and giving zero input on how the new trilogy should be made is the primary reason I'm looking forward to it.
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28895 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 11:23 am to
Obligatory Red Letter Media Review

A must watch if you have about 2 hours to spare. Incredible review that is pretty funny and will make you hate Phantom Menace way more than you could imagine.

What if Episode I were good?

This guy gives a great example of how much better Episode I could've been.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 10/24/15 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Yeah, while I still think Episode I is terrible, II is much worse.


Disagree.

Episode I is completely unnecessary. It doesn't really progress an overall plot. Episode II, although horrible, at least ties into the overall narrative.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram