Started By
Message

re: Update: 'The Marvels' discussion thread. It Ends as Lowest-Grossing MCU film

Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:30 am to
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:30 am to
Explain why you’re running cover for them with no factual basis

Enlighten us xir
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21271 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:32 am to
quote:

None of that is proof that the marvels spent as much as you claim. All I'm saying is I doubt they spent much since, you know, we had a very long strike. Disney also knew this thing was shite so they just cut their losses.


So no facts, just feelings

Short version we all know, it needed to gross $440 million to just break even on production costs. It is at $197. Even before marketing costs, it is going to be a 9 digit loss for DIS.

Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Short version we all know, it needed to gross $440 million to just break even on production costs.

Isn’t that without accounting for theater take? Indy 5 needed $800 million to break even since they take 50%
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51660 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Explain why you’re running cover for them with no factual basis



WTF are you talking about? Are you always this overdramatic? I simply gave my opinion. I don't give a shite if Disney fails or succeeds. It doesn't affect my life one-way or another
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15561 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:37 am to
Maybe you shouldn’t claim things as fact just relying on your feelings for the mouse next time
Posted by LSUPERMAN
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
2488 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I simply gave my opinion


quote:

Link? Studios don't spend 150 under normal circumstances, much less during a strike. Stop being ridiculous


No dog in this fight but you are pretty definitive with your opinion.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21271 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Isn’t that without accounting for theater take?


That is half going to theater and just to break even on production costs. When you factor in Marketing, probably $600 - $700.

Indy 5 had a larger marketing cost for sure. No strike and they just had more marketing going on.
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
13306 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:23 am to
quote:

WTF are you talking about? Are you always this overdramatic? I simply gave my opinion. I don't give a shite if Disney fails or succeeds. It doesn't affect my life one-way or another


quote:

Explain why you’re running cover for them with no factual basis


One of these is being overdramatic and the other isn't. Guess which one it is (hint: it's not the one you think it is)
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51660 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:28 am to
Don't forget to add this to your post
quote:

Just carrying water for Iger and his band of tranny misfits
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 13Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram