Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

J Edgar

Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:52 pm
Posted by DaSaltyTiger
Alexandria/Pineville, LA area
Member since Dec 2004
4689 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:52 pm
Saw it Friday. Did not think it was Clint Eastwood's best work as a director. Perhaps it was the script flashing back and forth between present and past - needed to be a bit more linear. The two all male kissing scenes grossed every male in the theater. I'll never think of Leonardo DiCaprio the same again after those scenes. Sort of like everytime I see Ned Beatty, I associate him with the "Deliverance" scene.
Posted by BayouBengal504
Member since Nov 2011
3851 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:53 pm to
so is it not worth seeing at all?
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

Did not think it was Clint Eastwood's best work as a director. Perhaps it was the script flashing back and forth between present and past - needed to be a bit more linear.


I agree. I liked the movie and found it interesting but thought Flags of our Fathers was better.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:54 pm to
Thanks for the heads up.

Trailer looks muddled - sounds like the picture is too.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

The two all male kissing scenes grossed every male in the theater. I'll never think of Leonardo DiCaprio the same again after those scenes.
The horror!
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 12:11 am to
quote:

Trailer looks muddled


muddled is definitely the wrong word.

quote:

sounds like the picture is too.


definitely not.
Posted by south bama tiger
Member since May 2008
6646 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 1:21 am to
So since you referenced the male kissing, I'm going to assume they ran with the "J Edgar was gay" version of history? It's still disputed whether he was or not
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 1:35 am to
quote:

I'm going to assume they ran with the "J Edgar was gay" version of history?


yeah.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40971 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:06 am to
I hate when they freaking include disputed things like this in historical pieces despite there being zero confirmation of such.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:16 pm to
I have something outrageously awesome coming for The Arts Board tonight. In the mean time, here's an appetizer:

J. Edgar Near the end of the prophet Samuel's illustrious life, the elders of Israel were concerned with what was to become of their nation without Samuel's guidance. So they made a command: "Now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have" (I Samuel 8). For generations, the people had no king and "all the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes." J. Edgar opens in the eyes of a man who sees a world of similar relativism and needs an elixir. The people need a king and J. Edgar is more than willing to take up that banner. So, the movie quickly moves from biography to fable with the Saint Bernard of Clairvaux's leitmotif, "L'enfer est plein de bonnes volontes et desirs, often translated as "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

This portrayal of the plenipotentiary Hoover shows a man sedulous in every way, agog with the excitement only one who knows he is doing the will of God or one who is obsessively compelled to be Oedipus, that he became what he hated. This is the danger that all ideologues face: when we seek to do great things, pride is always waiting at the door. If we are not careful, if we are not always returning to the source of humility, the pride we have will cause us to miss the great good we are called to do. Gone is the good and present is the need to fill that empty, insatiable sack of pride that grumbles as an unfilled belly.

I must confess that I saw much of my own persona in Hoover: a grandiloquent, prideful megalomaniac who may use louche techniques in order to bring about the good as I see it. If I troll to bring down the empires of lust, gluttony, violence, and hatred, am I not of the same citizenship as those whose reign I seek to topple? It is true that we often hate in others what we hate in ourselves, and I think this is where J. Edgar is at its finest. The film is at its very worst in its immense speculative storytelling. The majority of the film is dedicated to what is supposed to be the contretemps homosexual relationship he had with his #2, Clyde Tolson. Although the majority of scholarship does not support this relationship, the movie is fixated on it. Hoover in the film is a puny, punitive man, frightened of the truth, always seeking to blackmail others because he is afraid of his own secrets. It is not a stretch to say that the movie hinges on the accuracy of this homosexual speculation. I don't buy it.

Perhaps the relationship he shared with Tolson is ineluctable for any biography, but the biography should not be built on it. Far more interesting and accurate is the depiction of Hoover's relationship to his mother. This is where psychologists have had a field day and I think the writer did a fantastic job of showing how much of Hoover's drive was the product of his mother. Hoover's mother was at the same time his rock and his chain. She gave him meaning, but she also enslaved him. And even after her death, he is not able to manumit himself from her words and ideas. I found the movie highly entertaining with its psychological analysis and its sweeping view of the early and mid-20th century. But the movie already has fleeted. I was not moved by it. And so, it is a borderline 6-7 movie. 7/10
This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 7:25 pm
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

I hate when they freaking include disputed things like this in historical pieces despite there being zero confirmation of such.


it's widely rumored and pretty much a given.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18432 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 7:48 pm to
Might wait until DVD to catch this one.
Posted by south bama tiger
Member since May 2008
6646 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

it's widely rumored and pretty much a given.


From wikipedia:

quote:

Some authors have dismissed the rumors about Hoover's sexuality and his relationship with Tolson in particular as unlikely, while others have described them as probable or even "confirmed",and still others have reported the rumors without stating an opinion.Hoover described Tolson as his alter ego: The men not only worked closely together during the day but also took meals, went to night clubs and vacationed together. This closeness between the two men is often cited as evidence that they were lovers, though some FBI employees who knew them, such as W. Mark Felt, say that the relationship was merely "brotherly".

Tolson inherited Hoover's estate and moved into his home, having accepted the American flag that draped Hoover's casket. Tolson is buried a few yards away from Hoover in the Congressional Cemetery.

Among those skeptical of claims that Hoover was homosexual is Hoover's biographer Richard Hack. Hack notes that Hoover was romantically linked to actress Dorothy Lamour in the late 1930s and early 1940s, and that after Hoover's death Lamour did not deny rumors that she had had an affair with Hoover in the years between her two marriages. Hack additionally reports that during the 1940s and 1950s, Hoover so often attended social events with Lela Rogers, the divorced mother of dancer and actress Ginger Rogers, that many of their mutual friends assumed the pair would eventually marry


He may have been gay, or bisexual, or straight, or a cross-dresser, but it's by no means uncontested. Definitely not a given.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 11/15/11 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

all male kissing scenes
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram