- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is there anyone here who thinks the Star Wars prequels were better than TFA/R1?
Posted on 1/22/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 1/22/17 at 3:52 pm
I have a friend who thought The Force Awakens and Rogue One were complete trash, and that the prequels were actually really good. I don't even see how that's possible. Anyone here feel that way too? Care to explain your reasoning?
Posted on 1/22/17 at 3:55 pm to Grim
I have no respect for people who think the prequels are good.
TFA was OK. R1 was pretty good.
TFA was OK. R1 was pretty good.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 1/22/17 at 3:59 pm to Grim
TFA is grossly overrated but it wasn't boring monotone garbage like the prequels.
At least TFA put real human beings in the movie who tried to act like real human beings.
At least TFA put real human beings in the movie who tried to act like real human beings.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 3:59 pm to Grim
I think RotS is up for debate being near Rogue One, but that's it. Sure TFA wasn't original, but it was a highly competent movie with good new characters.
The other 2 prequels on the other hand are total garbage. RotS was just too late to save the garbage train that was the prequels, and there were several frickups in that movie as well.
The other 2 prequels on the other hand are total garbage. RotS was just too late to save the garbage train that was the prequels, and there were several frickups in that movie as well.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:02 pm to Grim
I thought TFA was pretty weak aside from some really good moments. No wow factor for me at all.
Rogue One was incredible.
I knew Phantom Menace was crap while I was watching it but wouldn't accept that for years. AotC was well..., and I could barely trudge through RotS.
Rogue One was incredible.
I knew Phantom Menace was crap while I was watching it but wouldn't accept that for years. AotC was well..., and I could barely trudge through RotS.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:02 pm to Grim
No. Ep III is the only respectable prequel
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:04 pm to Grim
I thought TFA was the best since Empire.
But Rogue One supplanted it.
But Rogue One supplanted it.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Ep III is the only respectable prequel
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:11 pm to Grim
TFA and R1 were staggeringly mediocre and they're still much better than the prequels
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:17 pm to Grim
They're all on about the same level.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:21 pm to Grim
I don't hate the prequels as much as most people but they are vastly inferior to all other Star Wars movies
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:35 pm to Carson123987
quote:
TFA and R1 were staggeringly mediocre
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:43 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The other 2 prequels on the other hand are total garbage. RotS was just too late to save the garbage train that was the prequels
I actually think darth maul, general grievous, and count dooku were all really interesting characters. The problem is that Lucas killed them all off 10 seconds after they were introduced so they never had a chance to develop and resonate with people. If he had introduced them all in episode 1, then had Annakin kill them all in episode 3 (with Maul obviously being the last one) it could have been really cool. Like the emperor could have been ordering the 3 of them to kill various people close to Anakin to incite his anger and entice him to kill them, thus leading him to the dark side. But what do I know
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:48 pm to Grim
quote:
I actually think darth maul, general grievous, and count dooku were all really interesting characters. The problem is that Lucas killed them all off 10 seconds after they were introduced so they never had a chance to develop and resonate with people. If he had introduced them all in episode 1, then had Annakin kill them all in episode 3 (with Maul obviously being the last one) it could have been really cool. Like the emperor could have been ordering the 3 of them to kill various people close to Anakin to incite his anger and entice him to kill them, thus leading him to the dark side. But what do I know
It should have just been Darth Maul and have Anakin kill him before the halfway point of Episode III. I do think the logical point of no return for Anakin would be a 3 way lightsaber duel with Mace Windu and Darth Maul, with Anakin planning on framing Maul for Mace's death but he's caught in the action of killing Windu. Having Greivous and Dooku on top of this I think is too complicated.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:52 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It should have just been
is there any movie you dont rewrite in your mind?
How much time do you spend on this subreddit?
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:55 pm to OMLandshark
Grievous was such a stupid and unnecessary character. Just thinking about the prequels pisses me off
Posted on 1/22/17 at 4:55 pm to Uncle Stu
quote:
is there any movie you dont rewrite in your mind?
Yes, good ones.
quote:
How much time do you spend on this subreddit?
Never been there before. Reddit's format annoys me.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:18 pm to Grim
I thought Rogue One was one of the best of all the movies, granted I have only seen it once and haven't been back.
Force Awakens is a time filler, it started a new story, nothing special.
As for the prequels, I thought they did what they were supposed to do and tell a story and had lots of effects. No matter how we got to the point, Anakin would always become Vader and the ending would never be happy. Luke was a whiney shite so Anakin being one too makes sense. I thought it brought us the best two saber duels and I liked a lot of the characters, they just lacked a certain depth to the story.
Jar Jar is comprable to the Ewoks to me, they were both comedy filler. Kids loved Jar Jar like we loved the Ewoks as kids.
I really enjoyed that Rogue One went back to basics, practical effects and a deeper story of hope. makes me mad thinking that Disney axed the new Star Wars game that would have been similar to the Jedi Academy games.
Force Awakens is a time filler, it started a new story, nothing special.
As for the prequels, I thought they did what they were supposed to do and tell a story and had lots of effects. No matter how we got to the point, Anakin would always become Vader and the ending would never be happy. Luke was a whiney shite so Anakin being one too makes sense. I thought it brought us the best two saber duels and I liked a lot of the characters, they just lacked a certain depth to the story.
Jar Jar is comprable to the Ewoks to me, they were both comedy filler. Kids loved Jar Jar like we loved the Ewoks as kids.
I really enjoyed that Rogue One went back to basics, practical effects and a deeper story of hope. makes me mad thinking that Disney axed the new Star Wars game that would have been similar to the Jedi Academy games.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:25 pm to Grim
frick no. They are beyond terrible.
Anti-cheese version makes them watchable. Regular version is not watchable.
ETA: I loved Rogue One. Saw it three nights in a row.
Anti-cheese version makes them watchable. Regular version is not watchable.
ETA: I loved Rogue One. Saw it three nights in a row.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 5:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News