Started By
Message

Ian Ziering Earns more for Sharknado than Gal Gadot for Wonder Woman

Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:47 am
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51659 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:47 am


quote:

Back in 2014, while Asylum Pictures was developing Sharknado 3, Ian Ziering reportedly refused to return to the “franchise” without a pay raise. At the time, he was being paid a whopping $400,000 a picture, and even conceded that he took the role in the first picture only because he needed it to maintain his SAG membership and the health insurance that came with it.

Apparently, Ziering was awarded that raise. The Hollywood Reporter has a lot of fun behind-the-scenes intel about the Sharknado series — including the fact that now President Donald Trump threatened to shut down Sharknado 3 because he was replaced by Mark Cuban — but one that sticks out is the fact that Ziering is now paid $500,000 per film.

To put that in context, the film cost around $3 million to make, which means that one-sixth of the entire budget goes to a C-list star best known as the 5th billed series regular of a 1990s teen soap opera. Sharknado 4 was seen by 2.7 million people, so Ziering gets paid about twenty cents for every live viewer, which clearly means that Ziering is a loss leader for the franchise.

To put it another way, as Vox points out, Ziering also earns more for a Sharknado film than Gal Gadot earned for Wonder Woman. Gadot made $300,000 for that film, which went on to make nearly $800 million worldwide. Granted, that’s typical for the first installment of a superhero franchise: Chris Evans earned the same for Captain America, while Robert Downey Jr. earned $500,000 for the first Iron Man or the same amount as Ian Ziering. I am guessing that no one ever said to RDJ, “Good for you! You’re finally earning Ian Ziering money now!”

The discrepancy between what Ziering earns per Sharknado film and what Gadot earned for Wonder Woman is not a pay gap issue, necessarily. However, the difference between what Ziering earns and what Tara Reid earns for the Sharknado films certainly seems to be. Reid earns a quarter of what Ziering makes (or about $125,000 per film), and when she complained, SyFy threatened to kill off her character, although they contend the two issues were totally unrelated.

From THR:

quote:

She protested the disparity during the filming of Sharknado 3. Syfy later asked fans whether or not to kill off her character — but the network flatly denies that the two incidents are related. (Fans voted to let her live.) “I think Sharknado cares more about their ‘extra of the day’ than they do about their own cast,” Reid says, clearly weary of the franchise. “You work at something for five years and you don’t get treated as well as someone who shows up for a single day?”


Reid, nevertheless, not only continues to make Sharknado films, but she also stars in Trailer Park Shark with Mr. Belding and that guy from the American Pie movies. It airs on SyFy the night before Sharknado 5: Global Swarming.

Of course, both Reid and Ziering are paid considerably more than the D-list stars that turn up in the Sharknado films for cameos. They’re all paid the exact same amount — from Anthony Weiner to Clay Aiken to Fabio — and that amount apparently would not even pay for a beat-up Ford truck “that would be at the junkyard a week later.” But the boost to the careers of these C-listers is, uh, priceless? After all, Steve Guttenberg landed a regular role in this season of HBO’s Ballers after appearing in Sharknado 4, and that can’t just be a coincidence, can it?



LINK
Posted by JW
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2004
4761 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:50 am to
I find that hard to believe ...... that entire stupid movie cost 1.5 M to make maybe. Gal made close to that on Keeping up with the Joneses.

If her base salary was less than IZ I'm sure she had points on WW and ultimately made a lot of money
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14418 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:51 am to
Holy frick, I can't believe I just read all of that... I was legitimately interested. Somethings wrong with me.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11319 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:52 am to
Nobody watches Sharnado movies for Ziering or Reid.

We watch it simply for the art of cinema.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I find that hard to believe ...... that entire stupid movie cost 1.5 M to make maybe. Gal made close to that on Keeping up with the Joneses.

If her base salary was less than IZ I'm sure she had points on WW and ultimately made a lot of money




Did you even read anything posted?

A. Sharknado cost $3 million
B. IZ made $500,000, Gadot made $300,000

Literally everything in your post was addressed in the OP besides if Gadot got back end points on WW.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61480 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:54 am to
After reading all that the thing that bothers me most is them classifying Ziering as a C lister.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29136 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:54 am to
and don't forget merchandise money. anyone who thinks she will make less in the end off wonder woman is an idiot.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
6860 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Granted, that’s typical for the first installment of a superhero franchise: Chris Evans earned the same for Captain America, while Robert Downey Jr. earned $500,000


Click bait. It's trying to anger the feminism dragons, but there's nothing to see here
Posted by JW
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2004
4761 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:59 am to
i have a headache ... and did not read the article. Thanks for the cliff notes though.

She must have had major points and confidence in WW to go scale. Smart woman and will now jump to 20M for the next one. Good for her

Ed Helms was getting 850K a week on a film i did with him last year. And it was a dumb comedy.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39187 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:59 am to
This is for Sharknado 5 compared to Wonder Woman 1. The Sharknado series is apparently proven to be successful, Wonder Woman is not. Like others have said though, Gadot is likely getting money on the back end too which is a lot more.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61480 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:02 am to
quote:

She must have had major points and confidence in WW to go scale


Not necessarily. She was a relative unknown, a bit part in the Fast and Furious was her main exposure when she was signed up, and she was immediately shat upon by fans on the Interwebz questioning her ability to properly fill WW's...umm..."shoes".
Posted by JW
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2004
4761 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:04 am to
yeh good point ...
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36039 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Not necessarily. She was a relative unknown, a bit part in the Fast and Furious was her main exposure when she was signed up, and she was immediately shat upon by fans on the Interwebz questioning her ability to properly fill WW's...umm..."shoes".


Exactly. If anything, kudos to her management for getting Chris Evans and RDJ money for her.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:13 am to
I hate to say it, but Sharknado is a proven brand and hit.

There was no indication that Wonder Woman would have been the success that it was.

Not to mention she had absolutely no star going into this project.

This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 10:15 am
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15109 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:22 am to
Am I the only person on this board that hasn't seen any of the Sharknado films (not even the first one)?
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39187 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:25 am to
I've never seen them and have no desire to.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36039 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Am I the only person on this board that hasn't seen any of the Sharknado films (not even the first one)?
No, and I'd say we're the majority.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24003 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

After all, Steve Guttenberg landed a regular role in this season of HBO’s Ballers after appearing in Sharknado 4, and that can’t just be a coincidence, can it?


To be fair, he had already previously starred in SyFy's "Lavalantula" the year before, and was making the "Sharknado 4" cameo to promote the sequel, "2 Lava 2 Lantula."

Edit: Personally, I enjoyed the hilarity that is the "Sharktopus" franchise over "Sharknado."
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 10:36 am
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58061 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

She must have had major points and confidence in WW to go scale.


not likely

she didn't have shite for bargaining power before she signed up.

all that stuff comes later when she negotiates her second WW contract.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72062 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Granted, that’s typical for the first installment of a superhero franchise: Chris Evans earned the same for Captain America, while Robert Downey Jr. earned $500,000
Scruffy should be outra....

Oh, never mind.

Dumbass article.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram