Started By
Message

Will Tiger be all-time #1 in anything golf related?

Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:37 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:37 am
For even the Tiger fans, I think it's a given that he will not come close to breaking Jack's record of 18 majors. But something I did not realize is that he is not even number one in PGA tour wins. That belongs to Sam Snead with 82. Tiger has 79.

I just don't see him winning three or four more.
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 11:38 am
Posted by hoopsgalore
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2013
8645 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:39 am to
Probably won't end up at No. 1 in PGA Wins and Majors, but he's a solid No. 2 in both categories.

Dominant.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:44 am to
Some Sam Snead records

LINK
quote:

Sam Snead. He is the oldest to make a tour cut: 67 years, 2 months, 21 days at the 1979 Manufacturers Hanover Westchester Classic. He is also the oldest to finish in the top 10 in a PGA Tour event (63-3-4, 1975 B.C. Open), oldest to make the cut in a major (67-2-7, 1979 PGA) and oldest to finish in the top 10 in a major (62-2-15, 1974 PGA).

Snead's other significant-age record: oldest winner of a PGA Tour event. It was 50 years ago (April 1-4) that Snead won the Greater Greensboro Open for the eighth time in his illustrious career. Slammin' Sammy was 52 years, 10 months, 8 days old when he finished rounds of 68-69-68-68—273 at Sedgefield Country Club to win by five over three players. It was the same margin of victory Snead had in his first GGO victory in 1938. New York Times golf writer Lincoln A. Werden began his game story, "Sam Snead won the Greater Greensboro Open for the eighth time today and every senior golfer smiled."
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 11:45 am
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20686 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:45 am to
Well I don't know if this stuff falls under "#1 in anything golf related" but he has records like:

- Lowest scoring average over the course of a PGA season
- Lowest career scoring average
- Only person to hold all 4 major titles at the same time
- Most consecutive cuts made
- Won the highest % of tournaments entered

But you're right, he probably won't get the 2 you mentioned in the OP
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:46 am to
Money?
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33943 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:49 am to
Weeks at #1
Most PGA Tour Player of the Year Awards
Most Vardon trophies
Most consecutive cuts streak
WGC Championships

Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8321 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:50 am to
quote:

I think it's a given that he will not come close to breaking Jack's record of 18 majors

Tiger has 14. Not sure anyone will ever get closer than that to Jack's record. He is three shy of the total victories record. When you consider the level of competition each was faced with, Tiger's resume quickly elevates him to number 1, IMO.

No one in history has simultaneously dominated and revolutionized a sport the way Eldrick did. Courses had to be "Tiger-proofed" just to keep him from running away with tournaments. It still didn't matter.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13864 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Message Will Tiger be all-time #1 in anything golf related?

Well, he will be/already is #1 in more things golf related than any other player who has ever lived, by far.

But of the two lists you mentioned, I guess it remains to be seen.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I think it's a given that he will not come close to breaking Jack's record of 18 majors


Meh. This stat is like Wilts 100 point game. Golf was a lot more competitive when Tiger started playing
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Meh. This stat is like Wilts 100 point game. Golf was a lot more competitive when Tiger started playing

That is true. But you know not holding #1 in the books in the two that mean the most probably eat away at the ego-maniac.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40808 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:26 pm to
So a lot of people are completely fine trying to say Lebron and or Kobe are better than MJ because of stats, wins, etc....but totally ignore what Tiger did through the vast majority of his career.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202955 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:26 pm to
Tiger was more dominant during a 5-6 year period than any golfer in history. But overall Jack is #1. Jack has 18 majors but also finished 2nd in majors 19 times. Just think about that for a second...... He was in s position to win 37 majors. That alone puts him #1 in my book.
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6516 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:41 pm to
Most consecutive professional major wins (4) is one of if not the greatest record in all of sports and may never be matched.

Largest margin of victory in a major (15 shots)

Those are two significant records
Posted by EyeoftheEldrick12
Member since Jul 2012
1949 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:49 pm to
The question is, if he does reach both of the goals you mentioned, how mad will you be? I suspect if he does you will hate him more than you ever have.

great thread by the way.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:49 pm to
This post makes no sense. Unless you meant not a lot of people and also meant despite stats and wins.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8321 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 1:56 pm to
TBH, Peej, I don't think its even fair to compare them. Its almost apples and oranges in my book.

Jack was hands down the greatest of his era. Tiger hands down the greatest in modern era. Technology, competition, and the game itself (and style of play) was so different between the two eras. Its really hard to say one is greater than the other.

With a gun to my head, I'm going Tiger though.
This post was edited on 7/12/16 at 1:58 pm
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26641 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Courses had to be "Tiger-proofed" just to keep him from running away with tournaments. It still didn't matter.



I always thought "Tiger-proofing" courses actually made it easier for him to win. Tiger-proofing was just a fancy way of saying they made courses longer. Adding distance effectively eliminated shorter hitters, thus reducing the number of people who could compete with him.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202955 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:13 pm to
You have a point there . Hard to compare because of eras. It's also hard to compare players from both eras. Golf is s game of you against the course and the elements.
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
14054 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:13 pm to
1st African American Golfer to get his arse beat by a Swedish Girl?
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8321 posts
Posted on 7/12/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

It's also hard to compare players from both eras

Yeah, it is literally impossible unless discussing only stats. And although stats don't lie, they don't always tell the full story either.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram