Started By
Message

re: Will Brady admit he cheated in this speech?

Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112327 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

He wont even get in hall of fame now.


Should I go ahead and book mark you on this?
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

I mean, it has other problems for sure, like nuking the fridge, but having an old Indiana Jones is like having an old James Bond. It just doesn't work. Indiana doesn't have the same charm and spunk if he's 75.
Link to the Saints evidence? All that evidence must have been why the judge overturned Goodell's suspension of the players.
Posted by belowmebama
Member since Jul 2008
7304 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:47 pm to
Tom Brady will most certainly be in the HOF. The better question is will he require them to put his own gay arse logo somewhere on his bust.

Bottom line the NFL is better with Brady in it. Games are more exciting when you get to play the big bad Pats.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27424 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:48 pm to
So you are saying there were no bounties?

You all can have your thread full of denial. Its not really worth the effort because I really dont care enough.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17222 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

So no proof then.


Prove your not a bitch.

I'll wait...
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

i wonder how tom feels knowing that he will forever be remembered as a cheater. He wont even get in hall of fame now. he will be an outcast like bonds, sosa, mcgwire, pete rose. This is hillarious

I'm sure he loses sleep over what a Peyton fan thinks about him.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Prove your not a bitch.

I'll wait...

That makes no sense though.
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 8:55 pm
Posted by belowmebama
Member since Jul 2008
7304 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:54 pm to
That's what I laugh at. Were their bounties placed? Sure.

Players got paid extra to play harder and hit harder. What a crazy idea, you do that every game and you get a raise in free agency too!!! Holy shite.

Now before you jump to the "intent to injure" response it was widely reviewed that the Saints had less Personal Foul penalties and less injuries against us as well.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56503 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

People only care because it's the franchise that's been the most successful for 15 years now.

Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7004 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:57 pm to
I'm sure that Brady complained about balls being overinflated without ever specifying that they be deflated below the legal limit. The staff knew that Tom liked soft balls because he bitched whenever they were hard but I don't think Tom directed staff to deflate balls after they were approved by the refs.

In the final analysis, the NFL is going to end up with egg all over their faces because they can do nothing right.

If, as has been reported, the league suspected that the Pats would deflate approved balls prior to the start of the AFC championship why would the league let the game begin with soft balls if they provided a real advantage?

The NFL is as big of a joke as the NCAA and that's really saying something.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110855 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 9:25 pm to
How can you disagree with any of that?
Posted by UncleBlazer
Member since Jan 2013
3333 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

It is 100% faux outrage


What a pretentious comment.

This isn't the first time the Pats have been caught intentionally breaking the rules. You may not care about cheating but believe it or not, most Americans do.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43553 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

but I don't think Tom directed staff to deflate balls after they were approved by the refs.


you typed this with a straight face?
Posted by UncleBlazer
Member since Jan 2013
3333 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

but I don't think Tom directed staff to deflate balls after they were approved by the refs.


Not only did he do exactly that, he even rewarded them for doing it.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 10:09 pm to
Sorry you don't like facts?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56503 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Sorry you don't like facts?



It takes impressive delusion to think that people are just responding to the Patriots success...and not the repeated rule violations.

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56503 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

How can you disagree with any of that?



Because my opinions are based on logic...not emotion.
Posted by Ldrake53
Member since Feb 2013
2171 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 10:51 pm to
the difference between Saints and Pats: the Saints had a pay for performance scheme like so many other teams whose fans want to pretend otherwise. P for P is against the rules, Saints got caught and they should have received reasonable punishment; not total eviseration. Nothing the Saints did was remotely "cheating"; P for P does not provide any sort of competitive advantage. What Brady did does provide an advantage on the field.

I have no beef with either Brady or Belichik; they did what they did and they will have to suffer the accusations and outrage, faux or not. They are both great at what they do and deflate gate won't change that.

My beef is with Kraft who I consider to be a lying and hypocritical scumbag who encouraged, actually prodded is the better word, Goodell to anhilate the Saints because it fit his agenda. I think he is trash.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

It takes impressive delusion to think that people are just responding to the Patriots success...and not the repeated rule violations.

Haters gonna hate.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110855 posts
Posted on 5/8/15 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Because my opinions are based on logic...not emotion
I'm emotional about Brady?


Since your opinions are based on logic, what are your thoughts on Aaron Rodgers? I assume you think his legacy is sustained for the same reason(inflatoin/deflation of footballs), right?


This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 6:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram