Started By
Message

Why would any parent push their child to play RB?

Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:42 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:42 am
i meant to maek this thread a few weeks ago and just posted this question in another thread, but it's legit

RBs are abundant and have very short pro careers

almost no RBs get that major contract (Lev Bell's holdout is what made me think of this thread)

if you're athletic enough to play RB, then you can play LB, DB, WR, or DE (depending on your frame, but you have a ton of options). each of these positions not only allows a better chance to a pro career (as there are multiple of each position starting on every team), but you also drastically increase the money to be made

*ETA: RB has the 3rd lowest franchise tag cost (ahead of S and TE) of any outfield player in the NFL
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:44 am
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112278 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:45 am to
It's probably more from the coaches than the parents.


And i don't think it's as much of a given that you would be an elite defender because you were an elite RB.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38370 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:45 am to
The parents don't always have a say-so, and a lot of running backs were raised by a mom or grandma that doesn't take into account things like earnings per position.

The best athletes play QB or RB in youth sports, the culture of winning at that level is long and deep rooted. "Hey, this kid can fly, let's put him at corner and totally negate him from any action"

You don't see youth coaches with that mindset

And despite the knowledge that a kid can make more money if he's a good corner, kids still want the glory. Running backs get to score touchdowns and get their name in the paper
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:48 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:48 am to
quote:

And i don't think it's as much of a given that you would be an elite defender because you were an elite RB.

at the youth/middle/high school levels, it's just a statement about athleticism. if you can play RB, you can play a more optimal position
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:49 am to
quote:

And despite the knowledge that a kid can make more money if he's a good corner, kids still want the glory.

hence why i think we, as a society, should have this discussion. i think we can educate these kids into making more optimal decisions
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:50 am to
I doubt parents have much to do with it, but most coaches (and parents) aren't thinking about pro development when their kids are in 6th grade.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:52 am to
quote:

hence why i think we, as a society, should have this discussion. i think we can educate these kids into making more optimal decisions

Kids will always want to win. Putting your best athlete at corner in a low-level football game doesn't help you win.

If they have the athletic skill set to play another position, they will have that option in college and will likely be encouraged to do so.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102974 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:55 am to
How about not let your kids play football. Period.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11309 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:56 am to
Up until college, a lot of these guys are playing on both sides of the ball and on these lower levels you put you stud at QB or RB.

Once they are being recruited, a lot of these players don't want to give up the ball. They see it as a demotion to play LB.
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:57 am
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60254 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:04 pm to
It's the star position in 99.9% of offenses before college. QB isn't anywhere close to as important pre-high school. Once they get to a higher level of play, they don't want to give up that star role they've had their entire lives. We see it all the time. Trying to explain to parents/kids they would be much more likely to get a scholarship at safety or CB than RB. There are just so many RBs out there, but fewer true D1 CBs.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Once they get to a higher level of play, they don't want to give up that star role they've had their entire lives.


Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22844 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:12 pm to
If this was true everyone that isn't a 5 star or high 4 star RB would do it by college
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

If this was true everyone that isn't a 5 star or high 4 star RB would do it by college

only if they're being rational and making the most optimal economic choices for themselves

they clearly are not
Posted by TheMuffinMan
Arlington, VA
Member since Apr 2011
405 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:14 pm to
Yeah I don't think a parent is going to 1) put their foot down and insist their stud son play corner instead of QB or RB where they could help the team more (in the early years of developmental football especially, but even through HS); or 2) win that battle with the coach.

It seems like it's just a product of the relative development of different positions. In youth football, corners don't affect the game nearly as much as RB. QBs aren't developed so you aren't taking away as much value from the opposition. And there isn't as much physical parity so a RB can completely dominate a defense.

Now if they play the kid both ways, sure, best of both worlds. But at each stage prior to college (in which case they're auditioning for the NFL and get the most value out of exposure at their specific position), exposure in general is more attainable via the RB position than other positions that eventually become more valuable as the game develops.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:18 pm to
That's like saying a coaching job in the SEC is bad. Even Vandy and Kentucky pay millions of dollars. If you can play RB and make some cash, do it. It beats working in a factory.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

only if they're being rational and making the most optimal economic choices for themselves

they clearly are not

I don't know about others' experiences, but high school coaches I've been around that are worth anything would never put up with their best athlete refusing to play QB or RB. It's not their job to develop professional football players, even if you could actually make a solid argument that playing RB in HS actually has a negative impact on development to be a pro at another position.

The best players will find their way to the top way more often than not.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12294 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:46 pm to
How many of these kids switch to RB after the potential of playing at a higher level is displayed? Not many I'd presume, as youth coaches into High School are going to put their best athletes at the positions that garners the most opportunity to win.. RB/QB are those positions in youth football. Id be willing to bet that most WR's played RB at some point in lower levels only to move to the WR once their full size was realized and or the team had a better RB.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

if you're athletic enough to play RB, then you can play LB, DB, WR, or DE


A) RB gets more glory than any of those positions. Some people care about that.

B) just because you can play RB, doesn't mean you can play those positions. Not every RB has the hands to play WR, or the hips to play DB, can hit like a LB, or moves to play DE. And a lot of guys that play offense just don't have the same mind set that defensive guys play, you need a mean streak and to love to hit people.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155415 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

S and TE


Joxy scrambling mf'er

But i think some of it has to do with the glamour of the position. Young S, for instance, thought it was cool as shite to pretend to be Emmitt or Barry Sanders in his front yard, but once i got to jr high i had tWant to be Deion. Some parents probably don't mind thinking of their chirrens as the next great rb, or realizing they are bound to at least enjoy themselves based on how much action they'll get since not many youth teams are out there slingin it.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15239 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:08 pm to
I understand the point, but RB is the glory position. I remember playing youth football, no one would care that I had 5 pancakes and 5 tackles while playing both sides. But my rb friend, everyone would be in love with him because he scored three touchdowns. That is just the matter of the game.

If we are being honest. About 95% of football players want to play the offensive skill positions. Eventually most give that dream up. (Lineman realize they're too fat, DB's realize they can't catch and don't like getting hit, and LB's realize they have absolutely 0 vision.)

Usually by college this sort of thing weeds itself out. Everyone who is not in their best position will usually end up changing. But, that is not always the case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram