- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which pitcher's career would you rather have thus far?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:20 pm to TigerintheNO
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:20 pm to TigerintheNO
Kershaw making over $30mil per year. Dude sucks really bad in the playoffs. Really Really bad! LOL
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:25 pm to Pelican fan99
quote:
Take the rings and run
So you'd take Matt Cain's career over Kershaw's? Ryan Vogelsong's over Kershaw's?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:29 pm to 1ranter1
The one with more money. Kershaw
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:29 pm to GynoSandberg
Duh?
Pretty much everyone considered Bum a top 10 pitcher even before this.
Pretty much everyone considered Bum a top 10 pitcher even before this.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:45 pm to 1ranter1
They just changed it to give Affeldt the win and MadBum the save.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:47 pm to 1ranter1
I'd bet kershaw would trade with them
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:53 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
So Is there even a question whose career anyone would chose?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:54 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
I chose Lincecum
3 World Series Rings
2 time CY Young winner
3 NL strikeout leader
2 no hitters
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:56 pm to Rohan2Reed
In 6 of the last 7 years, Lincecum has either won the Cy Young, won the World Series, or thrown a no-hitter.
Not bad.
Not bad.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:58 pm to BayouBengals03
He didn't have the frame to be an long-time, all time great .. but that's a hell of a short career in the spotlight.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:25 am to 1ranter1
Kershaw = Peyton
Bumgarner = Brady
Take that how you want.
Bumgarner = Brady
Take that how you want.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:28 am to 1ranter1
I'll go with the accounting firm of Madison Bumgarner
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:44 am to PurpleDrank18
Kershaw is more like Marino
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:48 am to GynoSandberg
Recency bias. I went with what's been a current hot topic on the MSB. And it was more of analogy of regular season vs. postseason play, not so much a ring comparison.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 1:14 am to TigerintheNO
Bumgarner because he's on track to be a 1st ballot HOFer and once you get to that level rings put you over the top(in terms of who's career you would like to have, not who's better)
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:25 am to PurpleDrank18
quote:
Kershaw = Peyton Bumgarner = Brady
Take that how you want.
Not really a good comparison, because Peyton isn't hot garbage in the playoffs like Kershaw. Peyton's playoff stats are a little worse than his regular season stats but that's probably true for most QB's since you play better teams on average in the playoffs. But he's nowhere near as bad as Kershaw 5+ playoff ERA
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:01 am to benhamin5555
Kershaw’s 5+ ERA is a bit misleading. The only reason it is that high is because Mattingly didn’t trust his bullpen at all and left a tiring Kershaw in way too long. This Kershaw can’t pitch in the post-season narrative is getting ridiculous.
As great as Bumgarner has been thus far in the postseason (way better than Kershaw), if I had a must-win game 7 and I could pick anyone in the league to start it (assuming everyone is healthy and fresh), Kershaw would be my choice.
As great as Bumgarner has been thus far in the postseason (way better than Kershaw), if I had a must-win game 7 and I could pick anyone in the league to start it (assuming everyone is healthy and fresh), Kershaw would be my choice.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:21 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Given the fact that an mlb starting pitcher has much more effect on the outcome of a game than a QB,
Maybe, but thats only ever 4 games or so...
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:23 am to 1ranter1
quote:
Bumgarner
Regular season: 151 games 67-49 3.06 ERA
Postseason: 14 games 8-3 2.14 ERA 3 world series championships -- 0.26 ERA in 36 World Series innings. 3 World Series championships 1 WS MVP
That's Sandy Koufax level postseason domination.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:38 am to Lester Earl
quote:I know it's probably not a fair comparison since Bumgarner is legit great at what he does and not a role player, but Robert Horry was once asked if he'd trade his 7 rings in for Barkley's career. He laughed it off, not even taking it as a serious question because his answer was a no brainer move to take Barkley's career over his.
I'd bet kershaw would trade with them
But yea, I'd take Bumgarner's career thus far. But if you asked me who I'd rather be going forward, I'd take Kershaw and it's not even close.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News