Started By
Message

re: Which backup QB made you cringe when they had to play?

Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

He would make some really great plays only to turn around and do some of the most boneheaded, idiotic things I've ever seen an NFL QB do.


so basically he was no different than any other Saints QB on a consistent basis prior to Drew Brees?

Heath Shuler... Billy Joe Tolliver... Billy Joe Hobert... Steve Walsh... John Fourcade.. Danny Wuerffel... Bobby Hebert???

quote:

I'm not saying Archie Manning is Peyton Manning, but he's better than fricking Aaron Brooks, who wouldn't start on a single NFL team today


I never saw Archie play. I've only seen a few clips and it looked like a circus.

looked like he was running around for his life.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Also, I think the stats argument is unfair to Archie because in those days, all the QBs had rough TD-INT and QB rating stats compared to today's QBs.


Which is why I compared them to their peers. Aaron Brooks stacks up extremely well from 2001-2004.


quote:

Manning's curse was that he played with vastly inferior talent.


So explain the 1979 season where he was protected well and had 3 pro bowlers as weapons?
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 1:30 pm
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

So explain the 1979 season where he was protected well and had 3 pro bowlers as weapons?


He had a Pro Bowl season and New Orleans posted the best record in the history of its franchise.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58071 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

True but in the six full seasons that Hebert started in New Orleans, he averaged 10.3 wins. In the four full seasons that Brooks started, he averaged 8 wins, and while that doesn't include the 2000 season and the playoff win, that also doesn't include the 2005 flame-out.


measuring QBs by wins is just as dumb as measuring pitchers by them.
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 1:35 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

He had a Pro Bowl season and New Orleans posted the best record in the history of its franchise.



With 15 touchdowns to 20 interceptions.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

True but in the six full seasons that Hebert started in New Orleans, he averaged 10.3 wins. In the four full seasons that Brooks started, he averaged 8 wins, and while that doesn't include the 2000 season and the playoff win, that also doesn't include the 2005 flame-out.



Not like something else was going on in 2005.

Did Bobby Hebert ever play with the worst defense in the NFL? Brooks did, and the defense was terrible.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Not like something else was going on in 2005.


Which is part of the reason why I didn't include 2005. I gave Brooks the benefit of the doubt in that regard.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95187 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Did Bobby Hebert ever play with the worst defense in the NFL?
No, but he played with the best. Thats why the wins argument is dumb as shite
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

maine82


Anyways, I don't mind people not having Brooks as the #2 QB. I get the nostalgia and the state of the Saints back then.

I just don't agree with people acting like he was the worst player in the history of the Saints. He's one of the better ones in our pathetic pre-Brees history
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram