Started By
Message

re: When do we stop calling 12 over 5 and 11 over 6 wins upsets?

Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:05 pm to
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:05 pm to
Yeah thats right..basically other than the ultimate chalk year(2007) 12 seeds usually get 1 or 2 and 13's usually get 1.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

We don't. They're still upsets.

Unlikely events happen all the time. People win the lottery every week. It doesn't mean that they're still not unlikely events.




Not even close to the same thing

Like someone posted, 12 seeds are 12-10 since 2009. Not too much of an upset anymore
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:16 pm to
5 seeds dont really have a good track record because they tend to be slumping and not on good form.

I remember Florida getting there in 2000 but they narrowly escaped a 12/5 upset by Butler.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:16 pm to
That can easily be dismissed as a statistical anomaly. Why is 2009 the cut-off?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422241 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

They're only upsets in the respect that it proves that RPI means exactly jack shite

i wouldn't say a ranking system that uses a season's worth of data means "jack shite" b/c of an individual game
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422241 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

5 seeds dont really have a good track record because they tend to be slumping and not on good form.

yeah i'd bet due to the absolutely horrible and subjective way that CBB picks the tourney, the committee creates a self-fulfilling prophecy in this way to "push the pattern"
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38875 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

That can easily be dismissed as a statistical anomaly.




When you lose 45% of your games, it's not an anomaly.
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

That can easily be dismissed as a statistical anomaly. Why is 2009 the cut-off?


Im pretty sure a 12 has won at least 1 game in 22 of the last 25 years and a few years in the early 00's they won 4 or 5 back when double digit seeds were making elite eights.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422241 posts
Posted on 3/20/14 at 10:22 pm to
if it's not an anomaly, i'd love to know what it says
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram