- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/18/14 at 6:34 pm to double d
Not a Tiger fan but that article was pure garbage. Cant understand why a respected writer would stoop to that.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 6:34 pm to double d
I don't have a problem with that one. 
Posted on 11/18/14 at 7:31 pm to COTiger
IF Jenkins has a right to write what he feels is right, Tiger has a right to dispute it.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 7:38 pm to LanierSpots
Yes he does. But as I wrote, he should be worrying about his golf game versus maintaining his squeaky clean public image.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 7:40 pm to COTiger
quote:
Yes he does. But as I wrote, he should be worrying about his golf game versus maintaining his squeaky clean public image.
These arguments are always dumb. As if tiger has such a one track mind that he can't practice golf and be displeased with a shite article.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 7:49 pm to COTiger
Would you say the same if someone were disparaging you to your friends and family? Would you not stick up for yourself?
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:05 pm to COTiger
quote:
Yes he does. But as I wrote, he should be worrying about his golf game versus maintaining his squeaky clean public image.
He should be worried about both
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:18 pm to LanierSpots
I guess I should have used a sarcasm emoticon.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:19 pm to COTiger
I love Dan Jenkins, but that fake interview is not very funny and takes some predictable cheap shots. Tiger should have just ignored it instead of responding though.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:29 pm to tigerpimpbot
I'm not a literary expert, but since the piece was a parody, does that change anything?
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:50 pm to BRgetthenet
Team Dan here.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:28 pm to COTiger
quote:
I'm not a literary expert, but since the piece was a parody, does that change anything?
Legally, most likely yes. The fact that Jenkins openly stated that it was a fake interview would prevent it from being libelous.
And I the agency's letter to Golf Diagest, they only requested written apology and didn't threaten legal,action.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:35 pm to Wayne Campbell
Thanks. The check's in the mail. 
Posted on 11/18/14 at 11:54 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
I'm on Dan's side.
Posted on 11/19/14 at 5:20 am to Wayne Campbell
quote:
Legally, most likely yes. The fact that Jenkins openly stated that it was a fake interview would prevent it from being libelous.
This is just a way to be able to say what he wants to say to someone (slander them) without getting his arse sued.
Posted on 11/19/14 at 5:44 am to birdieman
quote:
Not a Tiger fan but that article was pure garbage.
I agree. Certainly seems like an out of place attack piece. Including a Tiger impersonator supports that IMO.
Posted on 11/19/14 at 6:31 am to kywildcatfanone
I thought the article was a fun read (and Jenkins even made a few great points). Tiger is coming off as a little bitch, which is not surprising.
This post was edited on 11/19/14 at 6:32 am
Posted on 11/19/14 at 6:38 am to RollTheRock
Tiger is a little bitch, of course he'd come across that way.
Posted on 11/19/14 at 8:42 am to BRgetthenet
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News