- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The NFL has upheld Tom Brady's 4 game suspension
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:10 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:10 pm to lsufball19
quote:
so will tom brady
For the next 2-3 years.
1
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:11 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
For the next 2-3 years.
you're assuming he's granted an injunction
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:12 pm to lsufball19
quote:
you're assuming he's granted an injunction
I am. Very good.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:13 pm to RollTide1987
Tom Brady has just authorized the NFLPA to appeal his case in federal court.
Oh snap.
Oh snap.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:14 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I am. Very good.
on what grounds?
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:14 pm to molsusports
quote:
I would be shocked if that argument held up in court. They were able to talk to the other parties and obtain the text messages they were interested in seeing.
There's an auditing term called completeness. Just because you have some liabilities on your balance sheet doesn't mean they are all there. Who's to say that there weren't any text messages between Brady and someone else? Brady may have been protecting other players or coaches, or even the owner.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:15 pm to lsufball19
quote:
on what grounds?
The same grounds all the other ones have been granted? It's not a real reach... hell he has the same lawyer.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:15 pm to lsufball19
Too lazy to read thread -- how many posts do we have from jcorye and wildtigercat?
My experience is it still can take a frickton of time to set aside or enforce an arbitration ruling, but I haven't tried the injuctive route.
It's completely
that Goodell was the arbitrator.
My experience is it still can take a frickton of time to set aside or enforce an arbitration ruling, but I haven't tried the injuctive route.
It's completely
that Goodell was the arbitrator. Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:15 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:
There's an auditing term called completeness. Just because you have some liabilities on your balance sheet doesn't mean they are all there. Who's to say that there weren't any text messages between Brady and someone else? Brady may have been protecting other players or coaches, or even the owner.
One of the hardest things to prove or disprove though :(
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:15 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
According to Brady he destroys his phones all the time, as do a lot of celebrities when they get new ones. And since he wasn't planning on giving his phone to Wells anyway, and since the NFL can't get it through a warrant, I don't see how it is relevant.
Because juries are comprised of people. I think the average person thinks that excuse he gave is malarkey.
Once a person proves himself to be a liar it's tough to determine what he's lying about and what he's not.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:16 pm to Jcorye1
Poor Roger... I feel bad for this loser. He's going to be once again embarrassed by the NFLPA and its lawyers
Brady is playing Week 1
Brady is playing Week 1
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Too lazy to read thread -- how many posts do we have from jcorye and wildtigercat?
I'd guess around 20 from me and 8 from Wildtigercat.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:16 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Because juries are comprised of people. I think the average person thinks that excuse he gave is malarkey.
I'm pretty sure they don't use juries in these kind of issues, which is why the NFL had such issues with Doty.
This post was edited on 7/28/15 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:17 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
It's not a real reach... hell he has the same lawyer.
it's not a reach but it's still no guarantee. it's up to the discretion of a judge too. and the standard for having an injunction granted is very high
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:17 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Because juries are comprised of people. I think the average person thinks that excuse he gave is malarkey.
an injunction is granted by a judge, not a jury
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:18 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Because juries are comprised of people. I think the average person thinks that excuse he gave is malarkey
Especially since he already knew they wanted the phone.
He's not Rain Man...he doesn't have to switch phones religiously every 90 days or whatever.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:18 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
I'm pretty sure they don't use juries in these kind of issues, which is why the NFL had such issues with Doty.
Ok, judge, arbitrator, whoever will be hearing his case. It's a really bad look to any reasonable person.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:19 pm to Goldrush25
Assuming they can subpoena the records, I doubt they'll care. If you want something that will cause credibility to be shaken, you only need to take one look at the Wells report, and Rodger doubled down and said he backs it 100 percent.
This post was edited on 7/28/15 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:21 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:
There's an auditing term called completeness. Just because you have some liabilities on your balance sheet doesn't mean they are all there. Who's to say that there weren't any text messages between Brady and someone else? Brady may have been protecting other players or coaches, or even the owner.
doesn't this fall under the category of just fishing? by this logic you could claim a lack of completeness unless you were privy to every private conversation he recently had with another employee of the NFL.
that's not a reasonable argument IMO
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:22 pm to Goldrush25
The Wells Repot itself can't even stand on its own..
Page 10 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News