- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The new pantheon rankings
Posted on 6/20/16 at 2:57 am to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 6/20/16 at 2:57 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:Nor can averaging 50 points a game, scoring 100 in a game IMO
11 rings cant be judged by today's standards.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:00 am to genro
I agree, which is why I dont have Wilt in my top-5 like many. That being said, his offensive game was far superior to Russell's.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:02 am to LSU Fan 90812
Wilt and Kareem @ 9 and 10 is laughable.
Russell in the top 10 is the stupidest part of this post though.
Russell in the top 10 is the stupidest part of this post though.
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:05 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:02 am to genro
And I also would argue with flipping Kareem and Wilt on my list. Kareem from 1971-1980 or so has a decent argument for #3 IMO.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:03 am to genro
I personally would put Bird at #4, but I agree with the first 3 and your top 5.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:09 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
1: Jordan
2: Lebron
3: Magic
4: Bird
5: Shaq
6: Wilt
7: Kobe
8: Kareem
9: Duncan
10: Oscar
This is a much better list. Though Kareem still gets way too little credit, while Magic gets way too much. How on earth could anyone who has watched both players put Kobe ahead of Kareem?
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:11 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:10 am to Roger Klarvin
Anyways I can just show you the years they were drafted to prove my point
Barkley: 1984
Olajuwon: 1984
Ewing: 1985
Malone: 1985
Robinson: 1987
Mutombo: 1991
Mourning: 1992
Shaq: 1992
Mourning was younger than I remember, but as you can see Shaq (and Duncan) doesn't quite fit into that great 90s era of big men. He's about half a generation behind. Which is why his most dominant years stretched well into the 2000s unlike the rest of them
Barkley: 1984
Olajuwon: 1984
Ewing: 1985
Malone: 1985
Robinson: 1987
Mutombo: 1991
Mourning: 1992
Shaq: 1992
Mourning was younger than I remember, but as you can see Shaq (and Duncan) doesn't quite fit into that great 90s era of big men. He's about half a generation behind. Which is why his most dominant years stretched well into the 2000s unlike the rest of them
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:12 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:11 am to CocoLoco
Bird is often underrated I find (as in put outside the top-5), he was every bit as good offensively as Dirk Nowitzki with none of the defensive issues and great passing ability. He did almost everything at an elite level, at least for his position.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:17 am to genro
quote:
Shaq (and Duncan) doesn't quite fit into that great 90s era of big men.
People are recognizing that a big reason that era existed was due to how the game was set up and called right? Not taking anything away from those greats but it's not really fair to say Duncan and Shaq get dinged for not being in that era.
Shaq is kinda a big reason why some major rule changes happened even after some other major league revisions already happened to the game. He kinda broke the game and they had to neuter him. Frankly how good Duncan and Shaq remained is more a testament to how good they were more then anything. Able to survive and transition through two eras.
We will never see a dominant era of big men like that again because the game does not look poised to go back to that type of ball and kids growing up today will not be developing for that type of play.
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:19 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:18 am to RTRLSD
quote:
How on earth could anyone who has watched both players put Kobe ahead of Kareem?
6-8 are pretty much interchangeable IMO. Kobe's combination of elite scoring and elite perimeter defense is really only matched by Jordan and Lebron, and as I said earlier Kareem really had no competition for the title of best post player in his day. Wilt retired in 1973 and post play outside of Kareem in the 70s and early 80s was pretty pedestrian. I put Wilt at 6 because, despite no competition outside of Russell, the guy averaged 40 points and 25 rebounds per game over his first 8 seasons. There comes a point when you are SO dominant its impossible to ignore no matter the circumstance.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:24 am to NOLA Bronco
My only point was during Shaq's best years he was NOT competing against those guys in their primes.
And if you think those were his prime years, then how on earth could you have Shaq ahead of Hakeem, considering the 95 Finals...
And if you think those were his prime years, then how on earth could you have Shaq ahead of Hakeem, considering the 95 Finals...
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:30 am to genro
And my point is that the league was much less favorable to big men in Shaq and Duncan's prime and yet they found a way to dominate. Shaq at an insanely high level but Duncan at a high level for an insanely long time.
So IMO you uncouple the shackles that were the slew of modern rule changes that hindered the way those two grew up learning to play basketball and a guy like Shaq especially would straight feast in that era.
So IMO you uncouple the shackles that were the slew of modern rule changes that hindered the way those two grew up learning to play basketball and a guy like Shaq especially would straight feast in that era.
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:31 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:41 am to NOLA Bronco
What were these rule changes?
5 seconds back to basket was added because of Barkley
Def. 3 seconds came in early 2000s and would've only helped
Lifting the ban on double team away from ball probably didn't inhibit him too much considering his position and style of play
5 seconds back to basket was added because of Barkley
Def. 3 seconds came in early 2000s and would've only helped
Lifting the ban on double team away from ball probably didn't inhibit him too much considering his position and style of play
Posted on 6/20/16 at 3:55 am to genro
Shaq is why we have modern zone defense rules.
Before Shaq, if memory serves me right, you couldn't double team someone that didn't have the ball. Shaq would just force himself down low and there was no one that could deny him the ball. When running a zone, you could have a guy trying to deny Shaq low post position and another guy fronting him to deny him the ball. It was the the way the league managed to change the rules because Shaq was just killing fools.
Even looking at his numbers you can see they took a bit of a hit after the changes. There is a reason guys aren't averaging 3-4 BPG anymore for instance.
The guy was a dominating force the league had to actively work to gimp because he was just unstoppable for all but the few teams that could match up with him.
Before Shaq, if memory serves me right, you couldn't double team someone that didn't have the ball. Shaq would just force himself down low and there was no one that could deny him the ball. When running a zone, you could have a guy trying to deny Shaq low post position and another guy fronting him to deny him the ball. It was the the way the league managed to change the rules because Shaq was just killing fools.
Even looking at his numbers you can see they took a bit of a hit after the changes. There is a reason guys aren't averaging 3-4 BPG anymore for instance.
The guy was a dominating force the league had to actively work to gimp because he was just unstoppable for all but the few teams that could match up with him.
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 3:58 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 4:40 am to LSU Fan 90812
Man those ranking are garbage
Posted on 6/20/16 at 5:00 am to genro
quote:
Shaq was competing in the era of Ewing, Hakeem, Duncan, Robinson, Mourning, Barkley, Mutumbo, Malone,
Shaq's prime was at the twilight or post-retirememt of literally every one of those guys
Before his prime (still with the Magic) he competed very well against all of them. People have this idea that he didn't fare well against Hakeem when he was young in the Finals - that is a misconception based on his team losing.
Posted on 6/20/16 at 6:04 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Bird is often underrated I find (as in put outside the top-5), he was every bit as good offensively as Dirk Nowitzki with none of the defensive issues and great passing ability. He did almost everything at an elite level, at least for his position.
Larry Legend should also get bonus points for doing everything he did while in a 'Larry Bird' body
Posted on 6/20/16 at 6:08 am to genro
quote:
Jordan
LeBron
Magic
Kareem
Bird
This is the best ranking I've seen. I can't in good conscience say that all those guys don't belong top 5. I think I'd have Bird 5a and Shaq 5b
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 6:10 am
Posted on 6/20/16 at 6:13 am to RonBurgundy
quote:
Tier 2
Duncan
Shaq
LeBron
Bird
You are such a cuck
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News