- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Steelers defensive scheme question
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:24 am
What were they trying to do last night ? They didn't blitz very much and rushed threw a lot and were giving the receivers a lot of cushion. What made them think that defense would work against Tom?
4
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:26 am to BobCoot
They play zone.
Tom Brady eats zone for breakfast, lunch, dinner.
The end.
Tom Brady eats zone for breakfast, lunch, dinner.
The end.
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:29 am to castorinho
The lack of a pass rush helped Brady more than anything.
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:29 am to castorinho
New England's offensive philosophy is perfect against a zone defense.... their receivers run a bunch of short option routes and settle in the middle of holes in the zone
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:31 am to castorinho
Tom Brady eats
for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:56 am to castorinho
quote:
Steelers defensive scheme question by castorinho
They play zone.
Tom Brady eats zone for breakfast, lunch, dinner.
The end.
Lots do teams run zone. That zone Pittsburgh ran was one of the worst zones I've ever seen.
There were no pattern-reading concepts. There were no blitz concepts. It was one of the most stale, unimaginative scheme I've ever seen. Nothing but a bunch of stale, landmark drops with no QB pressures.
Just so horribly designed and executed.
Posted on 1/23/17 at 10:57 am to BobCoot
They blitzed 6 times. Brady was 6 for 6 for 108 yards or some shite and a TD.
Iirc he was 36 for 39 on actual passed balls (removing drops and throw aways).
Iirc he was 36 for 39 on actual passed balls (removing drops and throw aways).
Posted on 1/23/17 at 11:03 am to cubsfan5150
quote:Well yeah, the way they were playing they had to get to the QB you have any success because with enough time those WRs will find a soft spot.
The lack of a pass rush helped Brady more than anything.
Didn't help that those guys did not seem to understand their assignments
Posted on 1/23/17 at 11:06 am to BobCoot
It's what they do, has not faired well against the Pats though. Almost every time Brady has played them they spread them out and force their LBers to cover or show where they're rushing from. And I believe they also had 2 rookies out there.
Posted on 1/23/17 at 11:24 am to BobCoot
One of the most fascinating things in sports to me is the Steelers running the 3-4. They have since 82. The 3-4 has nothing to do with their 70s run they started running it after the run.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News