- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SNF rating down Week over Week, flat YoY
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:51 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:51 am
quote:
With a 11.0/19 in metered market results, last night’s SNF was down 5% from last week when the Washington Redskins beat the Oakland Raiders 27-10. As the league took another week-by-week ratings hit just a month into the 2017-2018 season, year-to-year, Sunday’s game was also down a bit from last year. Compared to the then season low of the Pittsburgh Steelers’ 43-14 smackdown of the Kansas City Chiefs in primetime on October 2, 2016, last night’s SNF dipped 2% in the early numbers.
Down 2% in the early numbers is basically flat, but I'll update when final numbers come out. Seattle vs Colts without Luck being flat against Steelers/Chiefs is arguably a win for the NFL.
Haven't seen the numbers on the other networks yet. Pretty good early games so I'd think they'll be pretty good. We'll see.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 9:53 am
5
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:53 am to slackster
Can we get a rating comparison of the actual ratings themselves?
Feel like the amount of people looking at the ratings is up 80 percent over last year
Feel like the amount of people looking at the ratings is up 80 percent over last year
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:54 am to slackster
I am not surprised it was down with the Colts and no Luck.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:57 am to sms151t
I usually watch the Sunday night game but last night I had zero interest.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 9:58 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
Feel like the amount of people looking at the ratings is up 80 percent over last year
No shite. A search of NFL ratings brings up a ton of articles from mainstream outlets rather than the ratings-centric sites that used to post them.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:20 am to slackster
Obviously because even the biggest casual fan had little interest in this hapless colts team.
Surprised it wasn't worse.
Surprised it wasn't worse.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 10:29 am to slackster
It's down 5% from last week on NBC, but NBC game was down 11% last week. Admittedly that's one network, but that's not good. They have a prime time game every week.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:24 pm to slackster
quote:How?
Seattle vs Colts without Luck being flat against Steelers/Chiefs is arguably a win for the NFL.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:26 pm to JasonMason
quote:That doesn't sound good
It's down 5% from last week on NBC, but NBC game was down 11% last week. Admittedly that's one network, but that's not good. They have a prime time game every week.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:28 pm to ReauxlTide222
It's a shite game without Luck. Backup QB versus Seattle, in Seattle, is a recipe for disaster.
That's what I think he means.
That's what I think he means.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:32 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
It's down from a MASSIVE blowout from last season. A blowout that received the worst ratings in the NFL last year(maybe that's just for its time slot).
I'm gonna need a better excuse from you, my man
I'm gonna need a better excuse from you, my man
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:33 pm to ReauxlTide222
People weren't interested in the game, at all.
You need a better excuse than people didn't give a shite about the game?
Ok.
You need a better excuse than people didn't give a shite about the game?
Ok.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:40 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:Yeah, that's the problem
People weren't interested in the game, at all.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:41 pm to ReauxlTide222
Whenever you're ready to make a counter-argument, feel free.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:43 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
Are ratings not a gauge of how many people are interested?
Less people are interested.
That's not good.
Less people are interested.
That's not good.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:44 pm to ReauxlTide222
Less people are interested. But we were specifically talking about what slackster said, right?
Keep up, Bama.
Keep up, Bama.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:46 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:You say this is a win.
Whenever you're ready to make a counter-argument, feel free.
I say it's not a win.
Then I say this game was down from the worst rated SNFB game from last year. So that's not good. <-------- my counter-argument.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:47 pm to ReauxlTide222
Arguably a win.
Terrible game on paper didn't take a dip from the same week game last year.
I'll take it.
No one gave a shite about this game going in and you CFB nuts are trying to rub our noses in these ratings?
Terrible game on paper didn't take a dip from the same week game last year.
I'll take it.
No one gave a shite about this game going in and you CFB nuts are trying to rub our noses in these ratings?
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 10/2/17 at 2:49 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
Posted on 10/2/17 at 3:25 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
Did I take the W on this one? I think I won 
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News