- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SIAP: 2015 NFL Fan Equity Rankings
Posted on 7/15/15 at 12:36 am
Posted on 7/15/15 at 12:36 am
...and Miami fans are considered the worst in the NFL. Also note that New Orleans Saints fans are at #8, and Atlanta Falcons fans at #20...
2015 NFL Fan Equity Ratings
2015 NFL Fan Equity Ratings
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 12:52 am
Posted on 7/15/15 at 12:53 am to SoFunnyItsNot
quote:
For the past three years, we have tried to answer the question of which teams have the “best” fans. “Best” is a funny word that can mean a lot of things but what we are really trying to get at is what team has the most avid, engaged, passionate and supportive fans. The twist is that we are doing this using hard data, and that we are doing it in a very controlled and statistically careful fashion.
Posted on 7/15/15 at 1:03 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Maybe the biggest surprise is some of the teams that aren’t at the top. The Steelers and Packers have great fan followings. The Seahawks are slowly developing a great fan base. And these teams will do better when we switch to non-financial metrics such as social media following. But for the current “revenue premium” model these teams just don’t price high enough. In a way, these teams with massive season ticket waiting lists are the most supportive of their fans.
seems to directly conflict with the previous paragraph
Posted on 7/15/15 at 1:14 am to LL012697
Yeah I'm sorry but you can't convince me with any metric that Pittsburg should be at 14 either. List is shite
Posted on 7/15/15 at 1:36 am to SoFunnyItsNot
Pitt should be top 5. Easily. GB as well.
Posted on 7/15/15 at 1:38 am to TigersOfGeauxld
I read their paper linked in the article. They were open about "counter-intuitive results" and the possible explanations.
I pulled his quote about revenue maximizing that I think explains a lot. For ticket prices they used average face-value ticket prices. Maybe some aftermarket data like Stubhub sales would be useful.
I pulled his quote about revenue maximizing that I think explains a lot. For ticket prices they used average face-value ticket prices. Maybe some aftermarket data like Stubhub sales would be useful.
quote:
Our Fan Equity measure implicitly assumes that teams are revenue maximizers. There is a reasonable case to be made that this assumption is not always true. For example, the Steelers and Packers could easily raise prices and continue to sell-out their stadiums.
In a supplement to this article, we will be publishing a short work on a metric that
we call social media equity. Our Social Media Equity measure, while only based
on a couple of years of data, is a useful supplement to the Fan Equity measure. The Social Media analysis allows for fans from outside the market to be counted in a team’s equity score; the social media equity measure is not constrained by capacity limitations, and team pricing strategies less influence the measure. On the downside, the social media metric is based on social media activities that do not require consumer expenditures.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News