Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Settle debate, better talent-outfielders or infielders

Posted on 9/14/15 at 12:37 am
Posted by PJ250R
The Rock
Member since Sep 2006
2082 posts
Posted on 9/14/15 at 12:37 am
In terms of MLB. Outfielders because they have more ways they have to field the ball.
The other argument is infielders can outfield but outfielders can't infield and that 1st is an easy slugger position.
Posted by Zchlsu
Twin Peaks, Washington
Member since Jan 2011
6071 posts
Posted on 9/14/15 at 1:08 am to
From my experience with baseball it is much easier to transition to the outfield than any infield position. Playing in the infield has very little margin for error at the highest levels.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18985 posts
Posted on 9/14/15 at 1:27 am to
Finding guys with the range to play the OF is not hard. Its far more difficult to find guys with powerful and deadly accurate arms who can play SS, 3B and C.

And all that said catcher is by far the hardest position to field.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 9/14/15 at 9:10 am to
Go with the defensive spectrum (leaving off catchers): SS, 2B, CF, 3B, LF, RF, 1B.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18985 posts
Posted on 9/15/15 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Go with the defensive spectrum (leaving off catchers): SS, 2B, CF, 3B, LF, RF, 1B.


3B > 2B and CF
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15190 posts
Posted on 9/15/15 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

3B > 2B


Disagree. 2B requires more range and the ability to turn double plays. 3b does require more arm strength, but that's about it. 3rd really isn't that much harder than 1st.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145179 posts
Posted on 9/15/15 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

3B > 2B
quote:

Disagree. 2B requires more range and the ability to turn double plays. 3b does require more arm strength, but that's about it
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 9/15/15 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

3rd really isn't that much harder than 1st.


Posted by ptra
Member since Nov 2006
1428 posts
Posted on 9/15/15 at 9:51 pm to
I would put RF before LF. RF needs to have a stronger arm for throws to third. It is harder to field because the majority of batters are right handed and balls hit to the opposite field tend to slice away from the fielder.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram