- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Resumes of contending CFB Teams by Sagaran Rankings
Posted on 12/4/15 at 10:33 am
Posted on 12/4/15 at 10:33 am
Here are the teams, their schedules and each's sagaran ranking with the average and median rank below with underlined common opponents and italicized losses:
Bama is clearly the best schedule by this ranking with Stanford second.
You can make a case for UNC over OSU a little easier than I'd thought.
Alabama
Wisconsin 23
MTSU 88
Ole Miss 9
ULM 171
UGA 24
Arkansas 21
Texas A&M 31
Tennessee 16
LSU 18
Miss State 27
CHSO 121
Auburn 39
Florida 20
Average 46.76923077
Median 24
Stanford
Northwestern 33
UCF 168
USC 12
Oregon St 109
Arizona 56
UCLA 28
Washington 26
Washington St 49
CU 90
Oregon 19
Cal 32
Notre Dame 10
USC 12
average 49.54
median 32
Oklahoma
Akron 99
Tennesee 16
Tulsa 96
WVU 22
Texas 61
KSU 55
Texas Tech 37
Kansas 149
Iowa State 63
Baylor 5
TCU 7
Oklahoma St 17
Average 52.25
Median 46
Clemson
Wofford 158
App St 60
Louisville 35
Notre Dame 10
Ga Tech 53
BC 84
Miami 46
NCSU 47
FSU 6
Syracuse 80
Wake 93
USCar 71
UNC 13
average 58.15
median 53
UNC
USCar 71
NC A&T: 154
Illinois: 72
Delaware: 193
G Tech: 53
Wake: 93
UVA: 76
Pitt: 34
Duke: 57
Miami: 46
V Tech: 42
NC State: 47
Clemson: 4
Average 72.46
Median 57
MSU
WMU 65
Oregon 19
AFA 74
CMU 83
Purdue 103
Rutgers 97
Michigan 15
Indiana 67
Nebraska 48
Maryland 85
Ohio St 3
PSU 51
Iowa 14
Average 55.69
Median 65
Iowa
Illinois St 68
Iowa St 63
Pitt 34
UNT 182
Wisconsin 23
Illinois 72
Northwestern 33
Maryland 85
Indiana 67
Minnesota 66
Purdue 103
Nebraska 48
MSU 11
Average 65.76
Median 66
OSU
V Tech 42
Hawaii 166
NIU 70
WMU 65
Indiana 67
Maryland 85
PSU 51
Rutgers 97
Minnesota 66
Illinois 72
MSU 11
Michigan 15
Average 67.25
Median 66.5
Bama is clearly the best schedule by this ranking with Stanford second.
You can make a case for UNC over OSU a little easier than I'd thought.
Alabama
Wisconsin 23
MTSU 88
Ole Miss 9
ULM 171
UGA 24
Arkansas 21
Texas A&M 31
Tennessee 16
LSU 18
Miss State 27
CHSO 121
Auburn 39
Florida 20
Average 46.76923077
Median 24
Stanford
Northwestern 33
UCF 168
USC 12
Oregon St 109
Arizona 56
UCLA 28
Washington 26
Washington St 49
CU 90
Oregon 19
Cal 32
Notre Dame 10
USC 12
average 49.54
median 32
Oklahoma
Akron 99
Tennesee 16
Tulsa 96
WVU 22
Texas 61
KSU 55
Texas Tech 37
Kansas 149
Iowa State 63
Baylor 5
TCU 7
Oklahoma St 17
Average 52.25
Median 46
Clemson
Wofford 158
App St 60
Louisville 35
Notre Dame 10
Ga Tech 53
BC 84
Miami 46
NCSU 47
FSU 6
Syracuse 80
Wake 93
USCar 71
UNC 13
average 58.15
median 53
UNC
USCar 71
NC A&T: 154
Illinois: 72
Delaware: 193
G Tech: 53
Wake: 93
UVA: 76
Pitt: 34
Duke: 57
Miami: 46
V Tech: 42
NC State: 47
Clemson: 4
Average 72.46
Median 57
MSU
WMU 65
Oregon 19
AFA 74
CMU 83
Purdue 103
Rutgers 97
Michigan 15
Indiana 67
Nebraska 48
Maryland 85
Ohio St 3
PSU 51
Iowa 14
Average 55.69
Median 65
Iowa
Illinois St 68
Iowa St 63
Pitt 34
UNT 182
Wisconsin 23
Illinois 72
Northwestern 33
Maryland 85
Indiana 67
Minnesota 66
Purdue 103
Nebraska 48
MSU 11
Average 65.76
Median 66
OSU
V Tech 42
Hawaii 166
NIU 70
WMU 65
Indiana 67
Maryland 85
PSU 51
Rutgers 97
Minnesota 66
Illinois 72
MSU 11
Michigan 15
Average 67.25
Median 66.5
Posted on 12/4/15 at 10:46 am to ChunkyLover54
Well it's a little flawed to include the conference championship opponent because the result will impact that ranking. So if USC loses they probably won't have a ranking of 12.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 10:57 am to buckeye_vol
Four loss USC at 12 invalidates this whole pile or steaming crap.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 11:29 am to VABuckeye
Not sure about that.
USC would be favored over Iowa, for example.
Regardless there are far better measures than sagarin.
USC would be favored over Iowa, for example.
Regardless there are far better measures than sagarin.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 11:53 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
ell it's a little flawed to include the conference championship opponent because the result will impact that ranking. So if USC loses they probably won't have a ranking of 12.
Sure. It doesn't prove anything exactly, but it's apples to apples by one computer poll that ranks FBS and FCS. Yes, the rankings will change but not dramatically.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 12:16 pm to ChunkyLover54
What about Notre Dame?
Posted on 12/4/15 at 12:38 pm to ChunkyLover54
Florida / Tennessee
Common Opponents:
UK:
Florida @ UK W 14-9
Tennessee @ UK W 52-21
Miz:
Florida @ Miz W 21-3
Tennessee @ Miz W 19-8
UGA:
Florida vs UGA W 27-3
Tennessee vs UGA W 38-31
Van:
Florida vs Van W 9-7
Tennessee vs Van W 53-28
SC:
Florida @ SC W 24-14
Tennessee vs SC W 27-24
Head to Head:
Florida vs Tennessee W 28-27
Records:
Florida:
10-2
1-1 vs current Sagarin Top 10
3-2 vs current Sagarin Top 30
Tennessee:
8-4
0-2 vs current Sagarin Top 10
1-4 vs current Sagarin Top 30
Sagarin Rank:
Florida #20
Tennessee #16
Makes sense....
Common Opponents:
UK:
Florida @ UK W 14-9
Tennessee @ UK W 52-21
Miz:
Florida @ Miz W 21-3
Tennessee @ Miz W 19-8
UGA:
Florida vs UGA W 27-3
Tennessee vs UGA W 38-31
Van:
Florida vs Van W 9-7
Tennessee vs Van W 53-28
SC:
Florida @ SC W 24-14
Tennessee vs SC W 27-24
Head to Head:
Florida vs Tennessee W 28-27
Records:
Florida:
10-2
1-1 vs current Sagarin Top 10
3-2 vs current Sagarin Top 30
Tennessee:
8-4
0-2 vs current Sagarin Top 10
1-4 vs current Sagarin Top 30
Sagarin Rank:
Florida #20
Tennessee #16
Makes sense....
Posted on 12/4/15 at 12:38 pm to VABuckeye
quote:No it doesn't. You don't even know the purpose of those rankings.
invalidates this whole pile or steaming crap.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 12:44 pm to ChunkyLover54
quote:Well you seem to making an argument (UNC > OSU) based on that inherently flawed analysis (arithmetic mean is not really valid) based solely on SOS, then proceeded to make it more flawed.
Sure. It doesn't prove anything exactly, but it's apples to apples by one computer poll that ranks FBS and FCS. Yes, the rankings will change but not dramatically
I don't get why SOS alone would be used as an argument, but you could have at least used the SOS that Sagarin has in the rankings. That's at least a defensible metric.
This post was edited on 12/4/15 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 12/4/15 at 1:54 pm to ballscaster
quote:
No it doesn't. You don't even know the purpose of those rankings.
Didn't realize you were in my head. Now GTFO!
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:52 pm to rocket31
quote:
Not sure about that.
USC would be favored over Iowa, for example.
OK, well Ohio State would be favored over everybody. So just put them in.
Doesn't matter what Vegas says. The games are played for a reason. Go by the results and resumes.
Posted on 12/4/15 at 3:59 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
OK, well Ohio State would be favored over everybody. So just put them in.
Hear, hear!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News