- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pat Forde: Jim Tressell should be fired
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:04 pm to TouchdownTN
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:04 pm to TouchdownTN
I'm guessing you putting Michigan behind Wisconsin
probably the same reaction you would have if someone ranked UT behind UGA... which is maybe a stronger argument considering UGA has a better recruiting base
probably the same reaction you would have if someone ranked UT behind UGA... which is maybe a stronger argument considering UGA has a better recruiting base
1
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:07 pm to TouchdownTN
I thought you were making an overall program list, cause if you were it would be:
1a. OSU
1b. Michigan
3. PSU
4. NU
1a. OSU
1b. Michigan
3. PSU
4. NU
This post was edited on 4/26/11 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:07 pm to molsusports
There's a much wider gap between Michigan and Wisconsin these past few years, than there has been between UGA and UT.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:09 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
I thought you were making an overall program list
More of a list detailing each programs potential over the next 3-4 years.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:10 pm to TouchdownTN
quote:
More of a list detailing each programs potential over the next 3-4 years
Then I withdraw my
Still think Um has more potential then both NU and Wisco in the next 4 years though.Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:11 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Still think Um has more potential
Same up north sentiment during the beginning of the RR era. That turned out well.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:11 pm to TreyAnastasio
I'm not sure. From a pure roster standpoint, Michigan's rebuilding job makes Dooley's look like a cake walk.
The fact that they're in the big 10 though, should allow them to get back quicker.
The fact that they're in the big 10 though, should allow them to get back quicker.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:12 pm to TreyAnastasio
PSU is going to be garbage. this next few years Wiscy and Nebraska i think will be the big boys and tOSU if they can figure this shite out and manage in the meantime. UM i think has a little bit to get back into the groove
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:13 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
Same up north sentiment during the beginning of the RR era. That turned out well
Not from me. I knew from day 1 he was gonna be a failure.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:13 pm to TouchdownTN
short term i agree with you wiscy > michigan
long term I think michigan is still probably a better job... I'm not sure RE: Nebraska... they have recruited Texas in the past and will probably have to start working Illinois and Ohio now... that will probably cause them to down tick a little IMO (until they have established relationships with high school coaches around Big 10 country)
long term I think michigan is still probably a better job... I'm not sure RE: Nebraska... they have recruited Texas in the past and will probably have to start working Illinois and Ohio now... that will probably cause them to down tick a little IMO (until they have established relationships with high school coaches around Big 10 country)
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:14 pm to TreyAnastasio
Nebraska has more history than Penn State.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:16 pm to TouchdownTN
quote:
Nebraska has more history than Penn State.
Ehhhhh, maybe. I dont know a ton about either school, but they seem pretty equel to me.
This post was edited on 4/26/11 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:17 pm to TouchdownTN
history is massively over-rated by most fans IMO... what matters to kids when they are being recruited is whether they like the coaches and whether they think they can win there
Tulane and Ole Miss have more history than a lot of schools that recruit better than them
Tulane and Ole Miss have more history than a lot of schools that recruit better than them
Posted on 4/26/11 at 12:18 pm to molsusports
quote:
history is massively over-rated by most fans IMO.
Agree. I'm just responding to Trey's post the Penn State is a better program historically than Nebraska
Posted on 4/26/11 at 2:07 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
1a. OSU
1b. Michigan
3. PSU
4. NU
Nebraska is above PSU. Depending on your criteria, I think you could put OSU, Michigan, or Nebraska in the top spot.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 2:09 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Ehhhhh, maybe. I dont know a ton about either school, but they seem pretty equel to me.
Nebraska has more national titles between 1994 and 1997 than Penn State has in their entire history. Also, I'm not sure if there's a program in the country with more conference titles than Nebraska.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 2:11 pm to TouchdownTN
quote:
I'm not sure. From a pure roster standpoint, Michigan's rebuilding job makes Dooley's look like a cake walk.
The fact that they're in the big 10 though, should allow them to get back quicker.
I'm not so sure about that. Rich Rod's job when he took over, maybe, but I'm not sure now. It's a lot easier when your biggest rivals aren't arguably the best two programs in the country with arguably the two best coaches.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 3:33 pm to ohiovol
Conference Titles:
Nebraska - 43
Michigan - 42
USC - 38
Ohio State - 37
Those are the highest I found.
ETA: Oklahoma - 43 Conference titles
Nebraska - 43
Michigan - 42
USC - 38
Ohio State - 37
Those are the highest I found.
ETA: Oklahoma - 43 Conference titles
This post was edited on 4/26/11 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 4/26/11 at 3:48 pm to ohiovol
quote:
I'm not so sure about that. Rich Rod's job when he took over, maybe, but I'm not sure now. It's a lot easier when your biggest rivals aren't arguably the best two programs in the country with arguably the two best coaches.
My response is from the roster point, I did say they would have an easier time getting back due to the conference they play in but......
Did you watch Michigan play defense this past year? If we swapped our defense for Michigan's this past season we win 3 games max.
Memphis, Vanderbilt, UT Martin.
Michigan has some nice pieces on offense, but so do we.
Posted on 4/26/11 at 4:05 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Nebraska - 43
I think Nebraska has 46 per cfb datawarehouse.
edit: 3 were prior to 1900 and in some conference that I've never heard of.
This post was edited on 4/26/11 at 4:06 pm
Page 13 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News