Started By
Message

Niners players didn’t know the new OT rules.

Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:22 am
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48777 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:22 am
ESPN
quote:

"I didn't even know about the new playoff overtime rule, so it was a surprise to me," Niners defensive lineman Arik Armstead said. "I didn't even really know what was going on in terms of that."
quote:

Niners coach Kyle Shanahan said he and his analytics staff discussed overtime possibilities before the game, but Armstead and fullback Kyle Juszczyk both said that overtime strategy was not discussed with 49ers players leading up to the Super Bowl. "You know what? I didn't even realize the playoff rules were different in overtime," Juszczyk said. "I assume you just want the ball to score a touchdown and win. I guess that's not the case. I don't totally know the strategy there. We hadn't talked about it, no.”

Ouch.

And to make it sting even worse:
quote:

The Chiefs, conversely, said they were well prepared for an overtime contingency in the postseason. Defensive lineman Chris Jones told reporters that Kansas City "talked for two weeks about new overtime rules," while safety Justin Reid said their preparation began in training camp.

"We've talked about it all year," Reid said. "We talked about it in training camp about how the rules were different in regular season versus the playoffs. Every week of the playoffs we talked about the overtime rule."

This was no conspiracy. Reid and Co. simply coached circles around Shanahan and Co.
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 8:23 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422567 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

This was no conspiracy. Reid and Co. simply coached circles around Shanahan and Co.


This is being a bit dramatic.

Shanahan's analytics team and his staff discussed the gameplan. Is the argument the 49ers players played too hard when they had the ball first? Certainly they weren't loafing if they thought it was the old rules.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50309 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:24 am to
Yet another example of why Kyle Shanahan is a perennial choke artist. LOLOL

What a joke this supposed "genius" is.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53404 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:25 am to
I don't know if I agree with it, but he said they wanted to be in position to have the ball third.
Posted by DownSouthCrawfish
Simcoe Strip - He/Him/Helicopter
Member since Oct 2011
36368 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:26 am to
Coaching difference
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422567 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:26 am to
I have to imagine math says that receiving is the correct call with the new rules.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32488 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I don't know if I agree with it, but he said they wanted to be in position to have the ball third.

IMO, it does make sense, but I can see arguments either way. If you believe in your offense, you want the ball first because you believe you'll score a TD and worst case scenario in that event you get the ball third in a sudden death situation.

I don't see what the big deal is with the players not knowing the rule differences, it didn't affect anything in the game.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42554 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:33 am to
If he kicked, the Chiefs scored a TD, then the 49ers scored a TD to tie, and the Chiefs kicked a FG that next possession to win the game, he’d also be getting killed.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422567 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:35 am to
quote:

don't see what the big deal is with the players not knowing the rule differences, it didn't affect anything in the game.

100%
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82031 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:36 am to
How did this affect the game?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95290 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:39 am to
quote:

you believe in your offense, you want the ball first because you believe you'll score a TD
And then the team that goes second gets the huge advantage of knowing they have 4 downs instead of 3 the entire way down the field. It makes no sense to take the ball and play for a hypothetical third possession that may never happen, when jt js GURANTEED the 2nd possession happens where the kicking team has a big advantage
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95290 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

If he kicked, the Chiefs scored a TD, then the 49ers scored a TD to tie, and the Chiefs kicked a FG that next possession to win the game, he’d also be getting killed.
Correct. I would roast him for not going for two
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71464 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:42 am to
Most of San Fran’s team looks like they cannot read.
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15409 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

If he kicked, the Chiefs scored a TD, then the 49ers scored a TD to tie, and the Chiefs kicked a FG that next possession to win the game


So dumb that you guys are continuing to throw this hypothetical out there. He elected to receive and ended up having to kick on FG near the goal line because of it.
Posted by bernermountaindog
Member since Jan 2024
130 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I don't know if I agree with it, but he said they wanted to be in position to have the ball third.

I was going on and on about how retarded taking the ball first was last night until I realized this. It’s definitely the right decision if you set yourself up to get 1 more possession than the other team
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
16167 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 8:47 am to
The chief's D was gassed so i'm not surprised they took the ball.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52702 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 9:03 am to
quote:

I don't see what the big deal is with the players not knowing the rule differences, it didn't affect anything in the game.




Exactly. Much ado about nothing.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95290 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 9:05 am to
The chiefs D had been off the field for 22 minutes. How were they gassed? They may have been worn out, but if you can’t recover after 20 minutes then you aren’t recovering period. It isn’t like they just came off the field right before OT started
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 9:06 am
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42554 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:

So dumb that you guys are continuing to throw this hypothetical out there.


Before OT, everything is a hypothetical. You choose to kick or receive based on hypotheticals.

I’m just saying that it’s easy to say what he should have done now because of how it turned out.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95290 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Before OT, everything is a hypothetical. You choose to kick or receive based on hypotheticals.
The 2nd possession being a massive advantage js a known though. No ifs required for that. It’s a KNOWN advantage not needing a hypothetical
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram