- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:40 pm to BayouBengals03
He could have picked it up and ran out of the endzone and it would have been a touchback oddly enough
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:41 pm to Sterling Archer
Because the batting takes place before the ball goes out, therefore the penalty took place before the touchback.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Seattle gets every fricking call at home.
Let's not start a conspiracy.
Ref was right there and missed the call. It wasn't even a judgment call (well it kinds is, have to determine if it is intentional or not, but in this case it was pretty obvious), he just stood there starring at it. The dumbass just didn't know the rule.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 pm to Sterling Archer
Illegal touching of the defense which means the turnover wouldn't count. Ball would be given back to the offense. 1st down at the .5 yard line
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 pm to Sterling Archer
quote:
Can you explain this to me? Why wouldn't it be a touchback?
You can't bat the ball intentionally anywhere on the field after a fumble or onside kick etc.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:42 pm to tzimme4
quote:But can you review that aspect of the rule? Seems like a judgment call by the refs that normally isn't reviewable. (Not saying you can argue he didn't bat the ball out, he clearly did... just not sure if it could have been overturned on review.)
Should have been Lions ball at the 5 yard line. All turnovers are reviewble...
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:43 pm to castorinho
quote:
Let's not start a conspiracy.
Not trying to, just stating the obvious.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:43 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Seattle gets every fricking call at home.
Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:43 pm to tzimme4
quote:
1st down at the 5 INCH line
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:44 pm to BayouBengals03
I hate NFL refs 
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:44 pm to BayouBengals03
DP
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:45 pm to Mac
The possession changed due to a touchback which makes the play reviewable still
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:45 pm to castorinho
quote:
damn close
all jokes aside I did the game thread for the Fail Mary a few years ago
I was just talking shite and then that happened.
also, I couldn't get back into the website after I posted that.
frickING WEIRD BRO
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:46 pm to tzimme4
It's definitely a judgement call, because it's up to the official to determine whether or not he intentionally batted the ball.
So, I doubt that aspect of the play if reviewable upstairs.
So, I doubt that aspect of the play if reviewable upstairs.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:47 pm to LooseCannon22282
yeah TD crashed
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:47 pm to Rickety Cricket
quote:
Because the batting takes place before the ball goes out, therefore the penalty took place before the touchback.
Ah ok, makes sense now. If it would have fumbled on it's own and no one touched it then it would just be a touchback. Because Wright hit it out it's a penalty. Gotcha
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:48 pm to Sterling Archer
I don't see why so many people on tv are saying they had never heard of this rule.
You can't intentionally bat the ball anywhere on the field if you haven't possessed it yet. That's not common knowledge?
You can't intentionally bat the ball anywhere on the field if you haven't possessed it yet. That's not common knowledge?
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:50 pm to Jar_Jar_80
The reason why the illegal bat is never called on punters is because the result of the play is a safety and the penalty is never accepted.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 10:54 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
The reason why the illegal bat is never called on punters is because the result of the play is a safety and the penalty is never accepted.
Yeah, because even if they accepted the penalty, it's not like they'd get the ball with a chance to get a touchdown.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News