- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky's Starting Five vs Past NCAA Champs
Posted on 3/27/15 at 11:40 am to PentagonTiger
Posted on 3/27/15 at 11:40 am to PentagonTiger
'82 heels had MJ, Worthy and Perkins. They would skull drag all these crappy teams listed so far. The '82 Hoyas team had Ewing and Floyd. Everyone in this thread has to be young.
ETA: Get off of my lawn.
ETA: Get off of my lawn.
This post was edited on 3/27/15 at 11:42 am
1
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:05 pm to Solo
91 running rebels
4 first rounders, 3 in first 12 picks, and a 2nd rounder
would of gone undefeated, but the fix was in.
4 first rounders, 3 in first 12 picks, and a 2nd rounder
would of gone undefeated, but the fix was in.
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:13 pm to stlslick
Rebs were legit.
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:17 pm to Solo
this UK team is great, but college bball is really down
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:18 pm to NOTORlOUSD
So what are we judging? College teams or nba teams? I never like these discussions because players get built up or torn down based on their professional careers.
Like Marvin Williams didn't even start and was only pretty good (a worthy member of that team no doubt and in fact him coming off the bench might actually help that teams argument) in college and we have him listed as a starting power forward and #2 overall draft pick.
I just don't think any of that should matter. The 2010 Kentucky team, for example, is magically getting better and better every year.
Like Marvin Williams didn't even start and was only pretty good (a worthy member of that team no doubt and in fact him coming off the bench might actually help that teams argument) in college and we have him listed as a starting power forward and #2 overall draft pick.
I just don't think any of that should matter. The 2010 Kentucky team, for example, is magically getting better and better every year.
This post was edited on 3/27/15 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:41 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
The answer, I think, is both. The OP has where they were drafted and he is comparing title teams. The teams I have suggested were great college teams that contained great NBA players. Admittedly, his list of teams is really weird. Other than '06 FLA, and to some extent the '01 Duke team, I'm confused about the others.
This post was edited on 3/27/15 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:51 pm to Solo
I agree with some who say Kentucky's starting 5 is nothing to freak out about historically. I also think we're discounting how much WVU sucked at times tbis year, and had some freshman whip this Kentucky team into a frenzy.
What makes Kentucky dominant is the depth, not the starting five.
What makes Kentucky dominant is the depth, not the starting five.
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:55 pm to FootballNostradamus
Don't neglect pitino is a better in game coach than cal
Posted on 3/27/15 at 12:58 pm to Solo
quote:
'91 LSU team got eliminated early, but would run roughshod over this UK team.
quote:
the '11 UK team
2012
Posted on 3/27/15 at 1:06 pm to UNO
Do you even Shaq, bro?
Clearly referring to the 11-12 team.
Clearly referring to the 11-12 team.
This post was edited on 3/27/15 at 1:07 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News