- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kaep didn't vote. Stephen A. took slight exception.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:06 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:06 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
eh, who should he have voted for?
I don't think Clinton gave a frick about BLM. All lip service.
I think the issue is if you preach change you should at the very least not disenfranchise yourself and then act like it's the right thing to do.
He's become a hero and the message he's spreading is don't vote. He's just shite all over his own cause by showing his followers not voting for change but bitching about it is heroic.
What a terrible message to send especially as the black leadership in the country begs their constituents to hit the polls. He really did a disservice and sent a terrible message.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:12 pm to arwicklu
I get that "he didn't make his voice herad"
But voting doesn't make your voice heard, unless you actually agree with a candidate.
it changes your voice to something else. At least at this point.
But voting doesn't make your voice heard, unless you actually agree with a candidate.
it changes your voice to something else. At least at this point.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:19 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
But voting doesn't make your voice heard, unless you actually agree with a candidate.
Almost no one agrees with close to 100% of the positions of different candidates.
Voting is always a compromise. But if you refuse to participate you lose any claim to legitimate complaints about other people's decisions.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:20 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I get that "he didn't make his voice herad"
But voting doesn't make your voice heard, unless you actually agree with a candidate.
it changes your voice to something else. At least at this point.
The way he acted makes it seem like voting is not important because oppression cannot be overcome. Telling young people that look up to you that voting isn't important is disgusting. Why are you fighting for change and then telling people it's not worth fighting for?
Anyone who fought for the right to vote would be ashamed of him for spreading that message to those that see him as a hero.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:25 pm to molsusports
quote:
Almost no one agrees with close to 100% of the positions of different candidates.
What percentage should you agree with a candidate?
I have voted every election since I came of age. But at the same time, there was always at least some candidate i felt like 80% sure of.
I am not a huge BLM fan, but if thats what you are all about, and you feel that way, it is probably a huge portion of what you are looking for in a candidate. I don't think Hillary or Trump delivered that.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:35 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
What percentage should you agree with a candidate?
More than the other options.
quote:
I am not a huge BLM fan, but if thats what you are all about, and you feel that way, it is probably a huge portion of what you are looking for in a candidate.
There wasn't an overtly pro BLM candidate. But the idea that there was no difference is something I suspect the supporters of both major candidates would strongly disagree with.
Although I think there are some well intentioned people in BLM I don't think they have either a coherent message or an understanding of how to solve problems in the real world. With that bias I am really not surprised that a member of the BLM was too absolutist about his beliefs to accept anything less than 100% compliance with all of his beliefs. People who are at either end of political belief spectrum tend not to understand or respect the political beliefs of other groups.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:44 pm to molsusports
quote:
More than the other options.
thats fricking dump.
So you are saying if i agree with a guy 0% and another guy 1% i should endorse someone i disagree 99% with because I need to vote?
I wouldn't be saying "i agree with this guy 1 percent more" a vote is a 100% endorsement. there is no "Other Comments" section on a ballot.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:45 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
So you are saying if i agree with a guy 0% and another guy 1% i should endorse someone i disagree 99% with because I need to vote?
Do you really think there was a 1% difference in beliefs and policies advocated by the two candidates?
If you do then fine but I can't see how you would feel that way.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:48 pm to molsusports
quote:
Do you really think there was a 1% difference in beliefs and policies advocated by the two candidates?
its a hypothetical. Pushing the idea to the limit of reason to see if it holds up.
Really though, I don't think things are white ab black. I think you can be wrong in any number of ways. If you think both are wrong, why endorse 1 over the other.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:51 pm to ReauxlTide222
Not voting is the smartest thing you can do.
There's more at the link
LINK
quote:
“If voting made a difference, they wouldn’t let us do it.”
quote:
1. Voting only validates the failing system. By casting a vote, you’re telling politicians you accept things the way they are
2. Voting for a lesser of two evils — which the largest swath of the voting public will do today — equates an acceptance of evil
3. Are you pro-war? Do you want young Americans to travel abroad to kill other nations’ civilians, and be killed themselves, for hegemonic usurpation of natural resources for the profit of government welfare-backed corporations, Big Banks, and industries?
4. Voting is state-sponsored force. In every nation, and particularly the U.S., people have stark differences in values, religion, beliefs, ideology, culture — the list is endless. By casting a ballot, you’re forcing your specific set of beliefs onto everyone — whether or not they agree.
5. Presidential candidates are advertisers — they excel at propagandizing themselves as a tidy package of promises — but they rarely, if ever, follow through.
6. When you vote, the establishment wins. Always. In fact, the establishment’s only interest is self-preservation.
16. If you don’t vote, the irate masses warn, you aren’t fulfilling your civic duty — but the masses are simply stuck in the delusion that voting matters and don’t grasp the concept of coercive force. In no way is it your duty to impose your views on anyone by voting for this farcical system enriching the few at the cost of oppressing the many. Ire against non-voters only evidences exactly this point.
Further, the choice to not vote isn’t a privilege of a particular race, despite claims to the contrary. Telling someone you don’t have the luxury of abstaining from the election shows an absurd ignorance of the mechanisms of our system of governance. No matter who sits at the helm, the stratification of wealth will continue, the militarization of police will intensify, and legislators will write into law policies benefiting the upper crust.
17. Refusing to vote gives you both a clean conscience — and the right to complain.
There's more at the link
LINK
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:52 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
its a hypothetical. Pushing the idea to the limit of reason to see if it holds up.
Almost all ideas fall apart in extremis. But I don't think any reasonable person would think that was the issue we were discussing.
quote:
I think you can be wrong in any number of ways
Of course
quote:
If you think both are wrong, why endorse 1 over the other.
The two major candidates were both very unappealing but... with their variety of positions on a variety of issues it seems like a near statistical impossibility for an individual voter not to be able to think through a rational choice.
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:53 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
So you are saying if i agree with a guy 0% and another guy 1% i should endorse someone i disagree 99% with because I need to vote?
He's saying people typically vote the candidate that represents them best. I don't agree 80% with either candidate but I easily knew which one represented me better.
If you hate all candidates I still wouldn't tell your young fans that voting isn't important. Just say no comment instead of sending a terrible message to those that idolize you. If he didn't vote for even a third party or write in, then I don't have time to listen to how he wants to start a conversation.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:27 am to arwicklu
quote:Exactly
If you hate all candidates I still wouldn't tell your young fans that voting isn't important.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:40 am to taylork37
quote:
I don't take issue with him not voting for the president, I take issue with him not voting for every other important candidate/legislation that could truly make a difference to what he is preaching.
There were a lot of important ballot measures that were part of his stance that he needed to vote on in California.
Abolishing the death penalty, early parole for non-violent offenders, reducing drug crime sentences etc.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 4:08 am to jeff5891
quote:
Stephen A is just mad Trump won
Hasn't Stephen A admitted to being a republican?
Posted on 11/10/16 at 10:02 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:Wait, those were on the ballot?
Abolishing the death penalty, early parole for non-violent offenders, reducing drug crime sentences etc.
Kaep
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:51 am to ReauxlTide222
Well said by SAS.
Also, frick Kaep
Also, frick Kaep
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:53 am to ReauxlTide222
I loved when he said "go throw another incomplete pass."
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:57 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Make America White again
From Stephen A's mouth yesterday. He didn't like Trump and even if he is Republican, that doesn't mean he is required to vote that way
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:59 am to molsusports
quote:
The two major candidates were both very unappealing but... with their variety of positions on a variety of issues it seems like a near statistical impossibility for an individual voter not to be able to think through a rational choice.
frick that. You'd have to pay me to vote for either of them.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News