Started By
Message

re: Jeter To The Outfield??

Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71640 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

2010: 6 errors which was a career low, and a .989 fielding ct which was a personal best.


Cmon, you know fielding percentage is a crappy stat to use for determining how good a fielder is. His UZR is shite.
Posted by derekinne
Afghanistan
Member since Jan 2009
5895 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:04 pm to
With the range that Cano has, I don't think Jeter's range needs to be HUGE. Why go so far when Cano has no problem fielding it?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425100 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

2009: 8 errors which was a career low, and a .986 fielding pct which tied his personal best.
2010: 6 errors which was a career low, and a .989 fielding ct which was a personal best.

holy
fricking
shite
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279356 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:04 pm to
stat geeks are about to murder you with that response. But i agree, he isnt as bad as they are about to make out.


but anyway, the yankees want to move him from SS. They think he will eventually too old to play there, yet they want to move him to another position that relies on athleticism.
This post was edited on 1/30/11 at 3:05 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425100 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:05 pm to
i still have no idea why the yankees paid him so much for that long in the new deal
Posted by derekinne
Afghanistan
Member since Jan 2009
5895 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

They think he will eventually too old to play there, yet they want to move him to another position that relies on athleticism.


Gotcha.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279356 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

i still have no idea why the yankees paid him so much for that long in the new deal



because they can. and he is the face of the franchise
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71640 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

With the range that Cano has, I don't think Jeter's range needs to be HUGE. Why go so far when Cano has no problem fielding it?


It doesn't have to be huge, but watching Yankee games last year, if he literally wasn't right on it, it was a single. I'm not saying move him to the outfield, I'm saying he better hope his bat keeps making up for his very small zone (A Rod isn't a spring chicken on the other side anyways).
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71640 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:21 pm to
FWIW, Cano's UZR and UZR/150 are pretty terrible too.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:27 pm to
Jeter to the outfield, Hanley to da Yanks.

FAKT
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:40 pm to
It's not just the stats... watch Jeter play the position. He's friggin' terrible. He doesn't make errors because he doesn't get to any balls. He doesn't make errors. Big whoop. He doesn't make outs, either.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279356 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:52 pm to
I watch a ton of games. My eyes tell me he is right about average. I wouldn't call him a terrible shortstop.


There are way too many variables to put much stock into defensive stats. Even the fanciest ones.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 3:58 pm to
The enxt time he stops a ball up the middle will be the first. He's miserable going to his left. He's decent going to his right, but he also has A-Rod there to soak up balls. He's sure-handed and has a good arm, but my God, his range is pathetic. I don't see how anyone can watch a bunch of Yankee games and think Jeter is good defensively.

That's just observation. His stats are also bad, though they have improved from God awful to merely below average. Of course defensive metrics aren't perfect, but Jeter scores poorly in all of them, and its bourne out by observation. There's no reason to throw out the numbers. They support just watching his play.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279356 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

I don't see how anyone can watch a bunch of Yankee games and think Jeter is good defensively.


I never said he was good. I said he is average.


quote:

but Jeter scores poorly in all of them


all of them?

define poorly.


his last 3 years certainly haven't been "friggin terrible".

also is getting to balls that turn into fielding or throwing errors somehow better than not getting to the ball at all?


Look, I probably watch close to 1000 MLB games a year. I dont just look at the stats. In fact, I rarely do. Especially defensive ones, because there are a lot of holes in them and variables that cannot be factored.
This post was edited on 1/30/11 at 4:15 pm
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 4:15 pm to
Jeter is below-average defensively, but makes up for it a little bit by being very well-positioned all the time.

All things considered, he is not THE worst defensive shortstop in the MLB. Bottom 5? Still maybe no. Bottom 10? Yes.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Look, I probably watch close to 1000 MLB games a year. I dont just look at the stats. In fact, I rarely do. Especially defensive ones, because there are a lot of holes in them and variables that cannot be factored.

I definitely agree that the best way to judge a player defensively is just to watch him play the position throughout a 162-game season. But that is obviously impossible to do for every player.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/30/11 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Look, I probably watch close to 1000 MLB games a year. I dont just look at the stats. In fact, I rarely do.
I highly doubt you watch 1000 games a year. there simply isn't time. That's over 5 games a night, every night of the season. Unless you don't work or sleep, that's not true.

I watch about 100-150 games a year. Which is still only a tiny fraction of the games played. Not looking at stats, to me, is just being willfully ignorant. I think looking at only stats is also ignorant, but to ignore the record of what happened isn't a virtue. Stats remove our perception bias.

And I said Jeter has gone from terrible to merely below average. He's obviously worked on his game. Like I said, he's sure handed and has a good arm. He just has miserable range. So saying he's not been terrible in the last 3 years doesn't refute my point: I already said that.

What good is it to get to more balls and make more errors? Because even a lot of errors is balanced out by making outs. Compare Jeter to Andrus, a rangy player who does make a lot of errors.

Jeter played 1303 defensive innings at short. He only made 6 erors, but he made 182 PO and 365 A. That's 547 outs.

Andrus played 1291 defensive innings, about the same. He made 16 errors, which is a lot, though not Jose Offerman levels. He had 242 PO and 401 A for 643 outs.

So.. would you trade 10 errors for 100 outs? I certainly would.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram