Is Novak Djokovic's 2015 the Best Season Ever?

With so much difference over the years in playing styles, court surfaces, opponents, equipment technology, etc., it's an impossible question to answer. I didn't start following tennis until the Agassi/Sampras era, so I can't speak for anything beyond that.

I'll start by removing Nadal 2013. He's the best clay courter of all time, but not good enough all around. Also, this was when Fed was at his worst, and Murray had back problems.

2011 Djokovic was on pace to be the clear choice before injuries and fatigue set in at the end of the year.

For me, it's between 2015 Djokovic and 2005 Federer.

2005 Fed literally lost only 1 hard court match the entire year. That is disgusting. I can see the weak-era argument, but with the way he was destroying people, better opponents may have met the same fate.

Maybe the most impressive thing about 2015 Djokovic is the quality of opponents. With Fed serving better than ever, his level of play is not far off from his prime. Murray could be playing his best tennis, or close to it. Wawrinka is clearly at his peak, and an absolute monster when he's on.

He's also the only player I've seen who can adapt his playing style to his opponent and make tweaks mid-match to play to his strengths and cover his weaknesses. He can be agressive and play offense, and if he's having an off day, he can turn into an absolute wall and play defense better than anyone else by far.

Just on pure numbers, Laver with 17 titles and 4 majors is pretty nuts. And that was at a time when the court surfaces were vastly different, so it had to be extremely tough to win on all of them.

Novak will have 20 major titles when he retires. There is nobody left to stop him the next four to five years.

quote:

---

Agassi Sampras era

---

Don't forget about Jim Courrier. Loved watching him play. Gustavo Kuerten was another one that was hot and quickly fizzled away.

quote:

---

I'll start by removing Nadal 2013. He's the best clay courter of all time, but not good enough all around. Also, this was when Fed was at his worst, and Murray had back problems.

---

quote:

---

I think I've read that nobody has won more than 5 majors after 27 and Novak is at 4. He should obliterate that, but it might make you think twice about whether he wins 5+ more from this point.

---

He's aging really well, and he'll continue to. As much as he is a great athlete and he plays an athletic brand of tennis, he really doesn't play an *explosive* brand of tennis. He owes his court coverage as much or more to Gumby-like flexibility than quickness. And the fact that he's so lean really takes away from any pounding on his joints.

I honestly don't see his game dropping off at all in the next three years.

You said best season. I'm just staying on topic. Best player ever, or best stretch of play ever... those are entirely different questions.

True, my point about Nadal not being good enough all around is actually irrelevant in this discussion, and I should have left that out.

quote:

---

You said best season. I'm just staying on topic. Best player ever, or best stretch of play ever... those are entirely different questions.

---

My bad.

quote:

---

True, my point about Nadal not being good enough all around is actually irrelevant in this discussion, and I should have left that out.

---

Your bad.

We'll call it even.

1984
1 John McEnroe
2 Jimmy Connors
3 Ivan Lendl
4 Mats Wilander
5 Andres Gomez
6 Anders Jarryd
7 Henrik Sundstrom
8 Pat Cash
9 Eliot Teltscher
10 Yannick Noah

You could take this final top 10 and add up all the wins over these guys. It would take forever on my phone.

quote:

---

2006 Federer Record: 92-5 Titles: 12 Majors: 3 Record against top ten: 19-4 Masters's Titles: =4 Rivals: Andy Roddick, James Blake, 19 year old Rafael Nadal, David Nalbandian, Lol

---

This.............