- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it possible for BAMA to be as dominant in the most competitive sport without cheating?
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:24 pm
I just don't understand how in the most competitive sport in the country a team can be this dominant for this long through countless Assistant Coaches, players, recruiting classes, etc. I mean, I get lesbian basketball dominance, but football.
This post was edited on 11/3/18 at 11:17 pm
20
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:26 pm to rpg37
My thread about Alabama having a mole inside the LSU program was only half joking.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:29 pm to PrimeTime Money
Patriots have done it on the professional level.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:29 pm to rpg37
Every big program cheats in college football, they just have the GOAT coach and the #1 recruiting class every year
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:30 pm to Morty
quote:
Patriots have done it on the professional level.
Not to this degree. And they have had competitive years. Alabama could honestly run three plays on offense all year and go 10-2. They are physically superior.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:35 pm to rpg37
What kind of cheating did they do tonight?
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:36 pm to LanierSpots
They were all jacked up on rabies.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:37 pm to LanierSpots
LSU got away with several holds. Somehow that proves Bama cheats.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:37 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
What kind of cheating did they do tonight?
I am referring to recruiting practices and behind the scenes. I mean, their recruits are now so far physically ahead of the NCAA.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:40 pm to rpg37
Great coach, great facilities, and he makes sure 2 surround himself with very good to great coaches.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:42 pm to rpg37
Well guys that fail 10 drug tests at LSU transfer and end up at Bams and amazingly are never drug tested. Guys that get busted by cops with drugs and guns get off when Bama pays off the judge.
Yes, Bama is just more dirty than everyone else.
Yes, Bama is just more dirty than everyone else.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:42 pm to rpg37
They clearly cheated when they let their knee-braced QB scramble.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:42 pm to rpg37
No.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:43 pm to rpg37
Golden State Warriors are just as dominant and they don't cheat.
This post was edited on 11/3/18 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:45 pm to rpg37
They are running a program-wide PED ring.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:51 pm to rpg37
CFB has almost never been as competitive as you want to believe.
CBB is competitive.
CFB has really never been.
Same dynasties over and over.
Same teams. Notre Dame/USC owned the 1970's, Miami/Penn State owned the 80's, Nebraska/Florida St. owned the 90's, USC/Florida 2000's, Bama now.
Look at the National Titles from 1970-Present.
It's the same fricking teams.
Alabama
USC
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Nebraska
Oklahoma
Miami
Penn State
Florida State
Florida
In between all that you have a Washington or Colorado or Clemson or LSU sprinkled in one or two years.
So when Florida, Florida State, USC, Miami and Nebraska all are mediocre or flat-out suck - it's a LOT easier for a program to dominate when half the schools that have won the majority of the National Championships the last 50 years aren't playing very well.
Look at our "playoff system" - relatively the same teams the last 4 years...THAT's CFB and always has been. Alabama doesn't have to beat 115 teams in recruiting - just a few - Top 10 and when 5 of them suck...it's REALLY easy to suddenly become Uber dominate.
When Nebraska owned the mid-90's - Oklahoma fricking sucked and USC sucked and Florida hadn't won shite yet with Spurrier...and Ohio State had John Cooper as HC.
You are greatly over-stating how difficult it is to create a rolling behemouth for certain schools. Pete Carroll and Saban won Nattys in year 3 with programs that were stuck in the mud. Bob Stoops won in - what year 2? With a shitty absolute garbage Oklahoma team he inherited just like Carroll at USC.
CBB is competitive.
CFB has really never been.
Same dynasties over and over.
Same teams. Notre Dame/USC owned the 1970's, Miami/Penn State owned the 80's, Nebraska/Florida St. owned the 90's, USC/Florida 2000's, Bama now.
Look at the National Titles from 1970-Present.
It's the same fricking teams.
Alabama
USC
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Nebraska
Oklahoma
Miami
Penn State
Florida State
Florida
In between all that you have a Washington or Colorado or Clemson or LSU sprinkled in one or two years.
So when Florida, Florida State, USC, Miami and Nebraska all are mediocre or flat-out suck - it's a LOT easier for a program to dominate when half the schools that have won the majority of the National Championships the last 50 years aren't playing very well.
Look at our "playoff system" - relatively the same teams the last 4 years...THAT's CFB and always has been. Alabama doesn't have to beat 115 teams in recruiting - just a few - Top 10 and when 5 of them suck...it's REALLY easy to suddenly become Uber dominate.
When Nebraska owned the mid-90's - Oklahoma fricking sucked and USC sucked and Florida hadn't won shite yet with Spurrier...and Ohio State had John Cooper as HC.
You are greatly over-stating how difficult it is to create a rolling behemouth for certain schools. Pete Carroll and Saban won Nattys in year 3 with programs that were stuck in the mud. Bob Stoops won in - what year 2? With a shitty absolute garbage Oklahoma team he inherited just like Carroll at USC.
This post was edited on 11/3/18 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:53 pm to rpg37
FBS isn’t the most competitive sport in the country.
No college sport is the most competitive in the country l.
No college sport is the most competitive in the country l.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:55 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Look at the National Titles from 1970-Present.
It's the same fricking teams.
Alabama
USC
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Nebraska
Oklahoma
Miami
Penn State
Florida State
Florida
In between all that you have a Washington or Colorado or Clemson or LSU sprinkled in one or two years.
Michigan.
Posted on 11/3/18 at 10:55 pm to rpg37
quote:
most competitive sport in the country
Umm NCAA football is the complete opposite of competitive
Posted on 11/3/18 at 11:09 pm to rpg37
Is it possible for you to learn dominant vs. dominate?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News