- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: is it fair to hold OU's past against them?
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:48 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:48 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Texas going beat them fwiw
1
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:48 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
They're not independent omnipotent beings; they're algorithm...the CPU's only pump out what humans put into them.
They are still objective and fair in the sense that if 2 teams played the same schedule and had the same record, they would be ranked the same.
quote:
And they don't watch the games btw in case you actually thinking the eyeball test still counts.
It does and that is why they are averaged with the human polls. But at the end of the day if three teams have the same record, the most deserving teams (ones will a tougher schedule) should go. If 6 computers all agree on those 2 teams, they might be on to something
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:51 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
i find it funny both teams- wisky and OU have a reputation for pouring it on for style points. expect both to put their foot on the floor in the 2nd half of games the rest of the way...
you must only look at final scores instead of a box score. just because OU scores a lot of points doesn't mean they pour it on in the second half. i did a pretty detailed analysis of OU scoring the other day with a fellow TD poster who thought the same as you.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:52 pm to tigerNation09
quote:
Texas going beat them fwiw
maybe so, but that doesn't really contribute anything to this thread, does it?
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:52 pm to theOG
quote:link? id love to read it
i did a pretty detailed analysis of OU scoring the other day with a fellow TD poster who thought the same as you.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:54 pm to theOG
quote:it would solve this problem
Texas going beat them fwiw
maybe so, but that doesn't really contribute anything to this thread, does it?
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:55 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
sorry, no link. it was on gchat.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 3:56 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
it would solve this problem
haha yeah it would, until texas ends up undefeated.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:04 pm to theOG
Wiscy would win a conference championship game, OU would not.
The CC game would hold more sway with who got in.
But to answer the OP. Yes, it is fair to hold up OU's past track record. The voters have been the deciding factor on B12 teams getting to the championship game.
The CC game would hold more sway with who got in.
But to answer the OP. Yes, it is fair to hold up OU's past track record. The voters have been the deciding factor on B12 teams getting to the championship game.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:05 pm to vegas-tiger
i'm fairly confident that when OU, Wisconsin and Alabama are all undefeated, it will be OU v. Alabama in the NC.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:05 pm to theOG
quote:
until texas ends up undefeated.
Doesn't work that way
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:05 pm to vegas-tiger
quote:wouldnt? or cant b/c it lacks one?
Wiscy would win a conference championship game, OU would not.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:05 pm to vegas-tiger
quote:
The voters have been the deciding factor on B12 teams getting to the championship game.
computers, not voters, put OU into the title game in 2003
They had such a commanding lead that going into the Big 12 championship game they knew they were already going to the BCS NCG
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:06 pm to vegas-tiger
quote:
Yes, it is fair to hold up OU's past track record.
How in the hell is it fair to say the current OU team shouldn't get it because they wear the same jersey as some players did in 2004?
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:09 pm to lsumatt
seriously... i don't get that either and fortunately for OU the voters won't be this retarded.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:14 pm to theOG
quote:i think the voters will go for the marquee name, OU.
i don't get that either and fortunately for OU the voters won't be this retarded.
interesting hijack- who'd get the nod? okie st who just beat 11-1 OU or wisconsin??
Posted on 10/7/11 at 4:20 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
so we have an undefeated SEC school- LSU or bama- and an undefeated OU and wisonsin. obviously, the SEC winner is in, but someones getting left out.
Oklahoma will stay cause Wisky will not play anyone else on the rest of their schedule that would vault them past OU.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 5:05 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
interesting hijack- who'd get the nod? okie st who just beat 11-1 OU or wisconsin??
Computers would have Okie State higher, IMO
Posted on 10/7/11 at 5:09 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
interesting hijack- who'd get the nod? okie st who just beat 11-1 OU or wisconsin??
Computers would have Okie State higher, IMO
Is OKIE St. 12-0???? Then YES. Wisky would be left out cause St. would have beaten a team better than ANY team Wisky has left.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 5:12 pm to dukke v
quote:seeing the pokes in the NC game would be a difficult sight to warm up to.
s OKIE St. 12-0???? Then YES. Wisky would be left out
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News