- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I hope Tony Romo goes out and wins the MVP/SB next year
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:13 am to pmacattack
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:13 am to pmacattack
How are they suddenly super bowl contenders with Romo?
Consider: Dallas win 13 games with a rookie QB and RB.
Do Denver or Houston have a comparable oline to Dallas at all?
Forget the team, were the Houston Texans one Tony Romo away from beating the Patriots in the playoffs? Were the broncos one Tony Romo away from making the playoffs?
No
Consider: Dallas win 13 games with a rookie QB and RB.
Do Denver or Houston have a comparable oline to Dallas at all?
Forget the team, were the Houston Texans one Tony Romo away from beating the Patriots in the playoffs? Were the broncos one Tony Romo away from making the playoffs?
No
2
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:19 am to HarrisLetsRide
quote:
He throws for over 500 yards and 5 TDs, yet he still got blamed.
Ah yes, the Drew Brees Syndrome.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:50 am to RocketPower13
need I remind you that had houston had a half competent quarterback they would have beaten the Pats in playoffs.
the year before when Denver won superbowl their OL was average at best.
both teams have solid defenses and Romo wont have to be a gunslinger that needs to put up 30+ pts every week.
the year before when Denver won superbowl their OL was average at best.
both teams have solid defenses and Romo wont have to be a gunslinger that needs to put up 30+ pts every week.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:52 am to Roger Klarvin
He won't
Dallas will fall off too.
Dallas will fall off too.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 12:54 am
Posted on 3/9/17 at 6:50 am to Roger Klarvin
Even though it's not possible, the JJ melt would be epic.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 7:16 am to Winston Cup
Yeah, if the Bears end up getting him their shite arse oline might be the end of him.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 7:34 am to pmacattack
Those are the plausible teams that will sign him, now tell me how signing makes either of those teams better than New England. That's all that matters, the team that signs him still isn't going to the super bowl.
Peyton Manning going to broncos and winning a SB does not equal Tony Romo doing the same. Yes the defenses are good on both teams but Romo, who's only played with one team and never been to a conf champ game, suddenly taking anew team to the Superbowl, which means being Brady, the Raiders, the Cheifs and whoever comes out of the NFC is not going to happen. They will have a better chance of winning 1 more game in the playoffs possibly, but there's no way he's winning a SB with one of those teams.
Peyton Manning going to broncos and winning a SB does not equal Tony Romo doing the same. Yes the defenses are good on both teams but Romo, who's only played with one team and never been to a conf champ game, suddenly taking anew team to the Superbowl, which means being Brady, the Raiders, the Cheifs and whoever comes out of the NFC is not going to happen. They will have a better chance of winning 1 more game in the playoffs possibly, but there's no way he's winning a SB with one of those teams.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 8:11 am
Posted on 3/9/17 at 7:46 am to Roger Klarvin
oh god, i hope not! ESPN cover him 24/7 while occasionally squeezing in all Tebow's highlights striking out
Posted on 3/9/17 at 7:51 am to weadjust
quote:
He had a good team around him in 14, 15, and 16 but couldn't win it in 14 and couldn't play in 15 & 16.
It's jerry's fault romo hurts his collar bone in a stiff breeze.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 7:58 am to Roger Klarvin
You do know the only reason Tex sold him the Cowboys was because he was going to fire Landry.
Then we won a SB very shortly after.
Then we won a SB very shortly after.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 8:02 am to RocketPower13
If the Texans had a QB they might have beat the Pats, slow down hoss.
Osweiller was just over 50%, under 200 yds and had a 1:3 TD:int ratio
Osweiller was just over 50%, under 200 yds and had a 1:3 TD:int ratio
Posted on 3/9/17 at 8:17 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Romo deserved so much better than the trash Jones surrounded him with for so long.
This x1000
Posted on 3/9/17 at 8:19 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I hope Tony Romo goes out and wins the MVP/SB next year
<--------- So do I.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:20 am to Roger Klarvin
Why would Dallas keep him? It just doesn't make any sense at all. Jones literally had Dak fall in his lap. The fact that they even considered keeping Romo is ridiculous. Yes he is good but for how long will he be? Maybe one more year?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:28 am to TexasTiger1185
quote:
TexasTiger1185
The falcons had Matt Ryan and a 28-3 lead, you slow down hoss. What in Tony Romo's history tells you that he would've won a close playoff game on the road against an elite QB?
You're saying if Brady had to have a drive at home in the playoffs vs a Romo-led Texans team you would take Romo? If we going revisionist history you'd have to be saying that's the side you're taking.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 9:32 am
Posted on 3/9/17 at 9:59 am to RocketPower13
I didn't say I would pick Romo over Brady. But I do think he could have won that game.
He beat the Lions by 4 in the playoffs, outscoring them 10-0 in the 4th quarter. Stanford may not be elite, but don't pretend Romo can't win football games.
quote:
What in Tony Romo's history tells you that he would've won a close playoff game on the road against an elite QB?
He beat the Lions by 4 in the playoffs, outscoring them 10-0 in the 4th quarter. Stanford may not be elite, but don't pretend Romo can't win football games.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:20 am to TexasTiger1185
Well shite, if he can beat the Lions in the playoffs (NOT on the road vs Brady and Pats)...
What I'm saying is winning a minimum of 3 games in the playoffs vs elite teams (=super bowl win with a bye)..
There's no way IMO you can honestly say Romo, (who's never lead a loaded team to a conf champ game) to the Texans or Broncos makes them a SB contender. (Assuming he stays healthy while facing pass rushers like Khalil Mack or Von Miller)
What I'm saying is winning a minimum of 3 games in the playoffs vs elite teams (=super bowl win with a bye)..
There's no way IMO you can honestly say Romo, (who's never lead a loaded team to a conf champ game) to the Texans or Broncos makes them a SB contender. (Assuming he stays healthy while facing pass rushers like Khalil Mack or Von Miller)
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:30 am to TexasTiger1185
quote:
Texans
quote:
Osweiller
How can the Texans even afford another QB?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:40 am to TexasTiger1185
If you're saying he could've won that game, you're taking Romo over Brady. If you change one of interference call, you're changing everything that happens in a game after that. You're changing a QB on the road in a playoff game.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 10:56 am to RocketPower13
Could have won.
Not definitely would.
I think the game would have been closer, and that's Romo could have won.
Could
Not would.
As in it is a real possibility. Not a certainty.
Could have won.
Not definitely would.
I think the game would have been closer, and that's Romo could have won.
Could
Not would.
As in it is a real possibility. Not a certainty.
Could have won.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News