Started By
Message

re: How was Bryant's catch ruled a TD

Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:31 am to
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23176 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Another truth bomb that people won't want to hear.


Of course that's the truth, the problem is it doesn't consider whether the person supposedly in control intended it to move.

Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59624 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:32 am to
Initial ruling buddy
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84788 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:32 am to
quote:

The ball was never moving after he got the 2nd foot down.



I agree, but that is not how a catch is defined. The ball is supposed to be in control FIRST and then you look for the feet being in bounds. The ball was not in his control while the first foot was in bounds IMO.

I don't really give a damn because frick the Bengals, but I don't believe it was a catch.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:33 am to
Yeah, because people in this thread are clearly perplexed that the referees could have called that a catch in real time.

The debate everywhere is about how it was ruled a catch after the replay. Don't kid yourself.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:34 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59624 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:35 am to
No it isn't. In real time it's looks to be moving everywhere. If I was the ref I would have called incomplete. Of course you may not like my opinion. That's is fine. No reason to get upset. If I thought the replay should have overturned it I would have titled thread "How can they not overturn that call".
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84788 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:38 am to
quote:

The call on the field was going to stand, whether they ruled it a catch or an incompletion.



I agree with this which is why I'm always hesitant to say that the officials should rule it a TD and then let replay decide. The threshold for overturning a play is too high for that to be the default position on the field.

Honestly I've got no clue how they can rule that a catch in real time. It doesn't look remotely clean. I think the referee just said "screw it, I'll call it a catch and let someone else take a closer look."

Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:46 am to
That definitely was not a catch. Bengals got screwed on that one. But I'm not complaining because the Broncos get to host a Steelers team possibly without Roethlisberger or Brown instead of a red hot Chiefs team.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Honestly I've got no clue how they can rule that a catch in real time.

He sees the receiver initially get two hands on the ball.

From that point forward, he gets three feet down, and then when he gets up after the flip, he has possession.

I can definitely understand how it was ruled a TD on the field.
Posted by Asphodel
Member since Jan 2016
820 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:48 am to
I hate the stupid bobbling rules.

If the ball moves around in someone's hands a little bit... who cares? They still obviously caught the ball.

The only time "bobbling" should matter is if they are literally juggling the ball in the air.


That's just my opinion of course. I hate how they try to judge whether a player had possession or not by these little movements of the ball in someone's hand.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82018 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:49 am to
quote:

The dress is fricking blue for christ sake.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16308 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:55 am to
Anyone who says that was a catch needs their eyes checked and may also be retarded. I'm not a fan of either team and picked the Steelers to win, but that was a horrible call.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16308 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I think the referee just said "screw it, I'll call it a catch and let someone else take a closer look."


I think on TD plays, the refs are instructed to call it a TD if they aren't sure so that an automatic review will be done. Unfortunately it looks like the SEC replay officials work for the NFL also.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59624 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:06 pm to
But control is the key to me. That's was by no means the definition of control.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119119 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:25 pm to
Ball did bobble as he somersaulted. Incomplete pass
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119119 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

and then when he gets up after the flip, he has possession.


Lots of players when they stand up have possession. You are supposed to maintain possession through out the catch, and he has rolling it up and down his leg as he was going out of bounds. That's not possession.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96012 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:19 pm to
I thought it was clearly not a catch. Was pretty surprised they upheld the TD. Think they got it wrong for sure.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96012 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:20 pm to
It looked to me like he finally got possession after the 2nd foot was down. But definitely not before then. They got it wrong.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278337 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Anyone who says that was a catch needs their eyes checked and may also be retarded.


it was close, he had 1 foot in for sure. But i dont think it should have been a catch
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119119 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately it looks like the SEC replay officials work for the NFL also.


Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119119 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately it looks like the SEC replay officials work for the NFL also.


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram