- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For all the idiots on here who tried to compare Spieth to Tiger
Posted on 5/14/16 at 3:30 pm to slackster
Posted on 5/14/16 at 3:30 pm to slackster
quote:how does one player get blamed for the organization being unstable as hell? Put kobe with the spurs organization and put Duncan with the laker organization and it's not like things change
The Lakers had some lows that were much worse and missed the playoffs a few times too, thus Duncan gets the nod for the better career.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:00 pm to dukke v
quote:
quote:
I'm not sure if Byron Nelson is one of the 3 best golfers of all time
He won 12 straight tourneys at one point. If he is not top 3, he is def top 5.
no, he's not anywhere close to top 5 ... no ranking has nelson in the top 5, or even close ...
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:08 pm to tiderider
quote:
no, he's not anywhere close to top 5 ... no ranking has nelson in the top 5, or even close ...
OK lets nitpic... he won 12 straight tourneys.... Tell me another golfer close to doing that... He is top ten...
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:11 pm to dukke v
quote:I don't. I'm a retard.
don't think you appriciate how hard it is to win ONE in a row let alone 12...............
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:12 pm to dukke v
quote:Who.the.frick.cares.
OK lets nitpic... he won 12 straight tourneys.... Tell me another golfer close to doing that... He is top ten...
I also don't care about UCLA's basketball streak. You probably think it's the greatest thing ever and no team now is good because they'll never beat it. I don't respect many sports accomplishments from back in the day.
This post was edited on 5/14/16 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:50 pm to Strannix
Sure all washed up at 23
Dumbass
What does comparing him to tiger accomplish anyway? That doesn't answer how he compares to the goat.
Speith's competition ia a lot better. Never will there be as lame a top 10 as in tiger's era again
Dumbass
What does comparing him to tiger accomplish anyway? That doesn't answer how he compares to the goat.
Speith's competition ia a lot better. Never will there be as lame a top 10 as in tiger's era again
This post was edited on 5/14/16 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:58 pm to Strannix
Those people who said this were just trying to get ahead of the crowd and predict something big and maybe have a chance to be right 10 years from now
Posted on 5/14/16 at 4:59 pm to gthog61
quote:
Speith's competition ia a lot better. Never will there be as lame a top 10 as in tiger's era again
Or maybe tiger was just that good
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:02 pm to slackster
I was using my point to fall in the "don't have to have it to be great" argument, I just did a poor job of articulating it by no means was I ragging the record. hell I'm on team Tiger GOAT
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:02 pm to jg8623
I think Tiger would have between 8-12 majors if his career started in the last 5 or 6 years. I have no doubt that some of these guys would snipe the shite out of some of his majors.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:04 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Spieth obviously isn't Tiger. But it isn't because of this silly cut stat. He could miss the cut for a year straight, but if he gets the wins in his career, he gets em.
And Tiger wasn't facing completion like this.
Majors aren't everything, but it looks like Spieth will win a shite ton of em.
And while Spieth can't match Tiger for this stage of his career, perhaps he could outlast Tiger by not becoming a whore-controlled head case.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:19 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
I'm not sure if Byron Nelson is one of the 3 best golfers of all time. I follow you, though. Maybe not. But imagine if someone today won 11 straight PGA tournaments. It's pretty mind boggling that someone could do that in any era.
wasn't some of that during ww2? hell, everyone else in the world was in the military or dodging bombs. he was a great golfer tho.
I am one that believes it's not possible to accurately compare players of different eras in pretty much any sport. no way could anyone will 11 straight tournaments with the fields of today. in the mid 20th century there weren't many pros, period. the crème was great, probably could be winners today also; there just weren't many of them.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:37 pm to Strannix
This thread reminds me of "the Spurz will sweep the Thunder" after game one.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 5:41 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I don't respect many sports accomplishments from back in the day.
Why?
Posted on 5/14/16 at 6:05 pm to COTiger
Because I either can't figure out how good they were/weren't, or I know that they weren't shite compared to what people do now. The UCLA men's basketball streak is a good example. It doesn't impress me in the least.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 6:32 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
how does one player get blamed for the organization being unstable as hell? Put kobe with the spurs organization and put Duncan with the laker organization and it's not like things change
I don't really want to get that sidetracked in this thread, but when comparing a player's career I think it is worth noting the type of guys who wanted to play with them and what they did within their teams. If Shaq stays with Kobe they're unbeatable for years, but Kobe drove a wedge in that and Shaq left. It's not a knock on Kobe the player, but in the context of his entire career against Duncan's, it is going to hurt. Duncan's demeanor helps. Duncan's flexibility with respect to his pay helps. etc.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 6:40 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
quote:
I'm not sure if Byron Nelson is one of the 3 best golfers of all time. I follow you, though. Maybe not. But imagine if someone today won 11 straight PGA tournaments. It's pretty mind boggling that someone could do that in any era.
wasn't some of that during ww2? hell, everyone else in the world was in the military or dodging bombs. he was a great golfer tho.
I am one that believes it's not possible to accurately compare players of different eras in pretty much any sport. no way could anyone will 11 straight tournaments with the fields of today. in the mid 20th century there weren't many pros, period. the crème was great, probably could be winners today also; there just weren't many of them.
his big year when he won 11 straight was '45 ... i don't know who was or was not playing, but 11 straight in golf is impressive, no matter the level of competition, as you say ... anyone who thinks that's not an impressive streak (and nicklaus and tiger will be the first to tell someone that's as impressive as just about anything in golf) just doesn't understand golf, imo ... snead and hogan played that year, though hogan wasn't "hogan" at the time ... nelson averaged 68.33 for the year, second lowest ever, and golf is a sport where the golfer's score is against the course instead of against another golfer, in most cases ... and he won by an avg of 6 or 7 strokes ... and he won 52 tournaments in an 11 year career, retiring very early because he hated to travel and wanted to buy a big ranch and sit back and chill ...
Posted on 5/14/16 at 9:25 pm to Lou Pai
quote:
And Tiger will never be Jack, cuck. It's okay though.
If you had the best golfers, of every era, and they all played their a game, Tiger would win. Tiger in his prime is the greatest golfer to ever live.
Posted on 5/14/16 at 9:47 pm to Strannix
He's quickly becoming as annoying as bubba Watson.
Posted on 6/15/19 at 7:26 am to Lou Pai
quote:
And Tiger will never be Jack, cuck. It's okay though.
This didn’t age well
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News