Started By
Message
locked post

Did Louisville Once Again Expose the Elite SEC Defenses?

Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:39 pm
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:39 pm
So I've said for a while that these SEC defenses were overrated and simply the product of mediocre QB play and offensive creativity. Now this isn't to say they're not good, they're very good. However, people making it out like there are 5-6 Steel Curtains in the SEC each year are absurd.

It's been proven time and time again that when you spread these SEC defenses out that good QB play can take advantage of them. These defenses are insolated by a conference that plays its games in a phone booth and isn't dynamic offensively.

A basketball program that couldn't even win the Big East outright just skulldrug Florida's dominant defense. Louisville needed 3 Overtimes to break 20 against UCONN, and no we're not talking about basketball, yet they threw the ball all over Florida.

Tajh Boyd looked like Johhny Football going for almost 350 yards and accounting for 3 TDs. Johnny Manziel (I'm talking about their style of offense which is unique for the SEC, I obviously know Texas A&M is in the SEC) torched Alabama in BDS.

My question is (and I know it took a while to get here), does this year change your perception of last year in regards to the LSU, Alabama, Oklahoma State argument?

Oklahoma State was better on offense than any of the aforementioned teams who had great success against vaunted SEC defenses. They had a more seasoned, talented QB in Weeden, a bigger playmaker in Blackmon, and a seasoned OL.

I always thought (and I think most agreed) that Oklahoma State was more deserving on paper, but that Alabama and LSU were simply better. I'm not sure if I still agree with that. I think they could have spread either of those teams out and had a ton of success. What do yal think?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

My question is (and I know it took a while to get here), does this year change your perception of last year in regards to the LSU, Alabama, Oklahoma State argument?


No. This year =/= last year. Had Alabama had last year's defense this year, they'd be 13-0 and -17 against Notre Dame in the BCS National Championship right now.

Posted by tigerbaittrick
Member since Jan 2010
7265 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:42 pm to
No. Bowl games can be bull shite in certain circumstances. A team that was close to a NC has been let down, and players that are declaring dont want to get hurt. If last night was a NC game Florida would have smoked them.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:42 pm to
Last year Oklahoma State>LSU>Alabama
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:43 pm to
I think it just proved UF had a highly overrated secondary.

UF's front 7 actually played fairly decent last night.

But Louisville's WR's were just running all over them.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38408 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Last year Oklahoma State>LSU>Alabama




Oklahoma St would have been destroyed by either team in the NC.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Last year Oklahoma State>LSU>Alabama


Well this surely wasn't true.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:44 pm to
Yeah...Florida put Louisville into a lot of 3rd & long situations last night because of their ability to stop the run. However, when Bridgewater needed to make a play with his arm, he'd make a play. That secondary just wasn't as good as advertised.

Posted by Bunta
Member since Oct 2007
12236 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Last year Oklahoma State>LSU>Alabama

Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

A team that was close to a NC has been let down, and players that are declaring dont want to get hurt. If last night was a NC game Florida would have smoked them.


Play that game whenever/wherever you want and Louisville wins. If that's not plain as day to you then you should pickup a different sport. Louisville killed Florida. It should've been a 20 point win with ease.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

No. Bowl games can be bull shite in certain circumstances. A team that was close to a NC has been let down, and players that are declaring dont want to get hurt. If last night was a NC game Florida would have smoked them.


I don't think you can say Florida's defense tanked that game last night. They came out hitting those Louisville players pretty hard. How many Louisville players lost their damn helmet last night? I think the fire was there but Florida's offense just sucked.
Posted by Boomdat
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
478 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Oklahoma St would have been destroyed by either team in the NC.


Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Well this surely wasn't true.

LSU beat Alabama on the road>Alabama winning a rematch in bowl game
Posted by Augustus
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2006
8290 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Last year Iowa State>Oklahoma State>LSU>Alabama

Must obviously be true then.
Posted by Louie T
htx
Member since Dec 2006
36302 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

If that's not plain as day to you then you should pickup a different sport. Louisville killed Florida. It should've been a 20 point win with ease.
You must have watched a different game than I did
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31919 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:47 pm to
I mean they had a pick 6, a fumble recovery in the red zone, and great files position bc of the onside attempt. And they scored 33
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

LSU beat Alabama on the road>Alabama winning a rematch in bowl game


Anal rapage > 9-6
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Florida's offense just sucked.


Well, this isn't really news to people that watched us all season...

What IS news is the fact that Louisville completely shredded the #1 pass efficiency defense in the country.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Well, this isn't really news to people that watched us all season...


oh yeah, I knew they weren't all that good but their incompetence was a key in the loss last night. If Florida's defense had any help at all last night from their offense. We may not be talking about this today.
This post was edited on 1/3/13 at 2:51 pm
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

I mean they had a pick 6, a fumble recovery in the red zone, and great files position bc of the onside attempt. And they scored 33


They also had the ball inside Florida's 10 twice and didn't come away with points because of penalties (once was on the fumble recovery that you mentioned).

The game wasn't even close. The only time Florida moved the ball was on gadget plays.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram