re: Dak or Romo?

Should be Romo, for them to be at their very best they have to have Dez heavily involved. Dak hasn't shown the ability to get him the ball consistently.

Dak isn't winning the games. He's managing the game with safe throws and letting the O-Line open holes for Zeke. The real reason Dallas is winning is because, for once, their defense isn't a steaming pile of donkey shite. Romo brings back the deep threat and makes Dez/Witten a more threatening prospect. Anyone who says a HEALTHY Romo isn't better than Dak is in way too deep on the koolaid. I wouldn't complain with either choice because the team is winning, but if you start Dak the better QB is on the bench. Dak has yet to even throw for 300 yards in a game and has only thrown for more than 250 one time. You start Romo if you want your offense to be completely opened up.

quote:

---

Dallas would be undefeated right now if Romo were healthy.

---

Maybe. Impossible to know


Dallas would for sure be undefeated with Dak if Terrance Williams had a higher IQ than 12

Everybody keeps saying "if" Tony Romo is healthy, but in all likelihood, that ship has sailed.

Romo and Prescott alternate series. It's the only way.

dak