Started By
Message

re: Clemson is Clemsoning in a whole new way...

Posted on 12/30/15 at 5:11 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 5:11 am to
quote:

Why?


because how righteous you are about weed being legal doesn't matter because this is what is going to happen if you get caught using it
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30573 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 6:16 am to
Because you'll get sent home
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 6:42 am to
Oklahoma would never have sent 3 of their players home.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51388 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 6:43 am to
quote:

I know Ammon IRL and dude is nuts. This is no surprise.


A douchebag backup kicker? Damn, talk about unbearable.
Posted by Random LSU Hero
2014 NFL Survivor Champion (17-0)
Member since Aug 2011
9440 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 7:32 am to
quote:

As mentioned, two don't mind and were cancers I wish were dismissed earlier


The BS spin is strong with this one
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3382 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 7:40 am to
Now it would only be fair for Oklahoma to voluntarily drug test their team ;) I'm assuming these guys were singled out for testing and had known issues.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 7:59 am to
quote:

The BS spin is strong with this one


BS spin? One handles kickoffs and one is a backup TE who hasn't even played this year.

I said the loss of Cain was a sever loss. Do you even reading comprehension?
Posted by gamatt53
Member since Nov 2010
4934 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 8:18 am to
Need to get them on that spice
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51388 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Now it would only be fair for Oklahoma to voluntarily drug test their team ;) I'm assuming these guys were singled out for testing and had known issues.


Did Clemson administer the drug test? Or, did the NCAA do the testing?
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3382 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 9:32 am to
I know all three have been suspended at some point this season. Two for "team violations". I think Clemson tested and was checking up on them.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 10:47 am to
quote:

To hear the weed advocates tell it, that should be no problem.



It isn't a problem. Its not like they are addicted in any way, shape or form to marijuana.

They're just selfish idiots.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 10:51 am to
quote:

I'm not either, but there must be a psychological addiction possible if not a physiological one.



No, there's not a physiological one.

These are dumb, selfish kids that have fun getting stoned. Its like having fun getting drunk when its against the rules. They think they aren't going to get caught.

quote:

Too many people screwing up their lives or at least costing themselves millions for that shite.



Lets forget about the tens of thousands that like marijuana but just don't do it because they don't want to get fired or kicked off their team.
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10517 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Oklahoma would never have sent 3 of their players home.


jesus, that isn't even close to true.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82061 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 11:06 am to
quote:

jesus, that isn't even close to true.


Wellllllllll Mixon will be suiting up tomorrow....
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10517 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 11:25 am to
and he got suspended for a year. if that incident happened right before this bowl game, he certainly would have been sent home.
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2917 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

BS spin? One handles kickoffs and one is a backup TE who hasn't even played this year.

I said the loss of Cain was a sever loss. Do you even reading comprehension?



Kicker could hurt. While starting kicker for Clemson has been great on FG's, he's been extremely suspect on X-tra points and hasn't been very good on kickoffs. Lapkik handled both due to the starting kicker's struggles. Clemson's KO coverage has been piss poor too, so much so that Lapkik was one of their leading tacklers.

So, Cain is a big loss, and like it or not, losing a guy like Lapkik who solved a clear problem Clemson was having on ST, also hurts.
Posted by Hook Em Horns
350000 posts
Member since Sep 2010
15128 posts
Posted on 12/30/15 at 4:26 pm to
i could tell you exactly was is wrong here..

but im not because im gonna get banned if so.
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2917 posts
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Kicker could hurt. While starting kicker for Clemson has been great on FG's, he's been extremely suspect on X-tra points and hasn't been very good on kickoffs. Lapkik handled both due to the starting kicker's struggles. Clemson's KO coverage has been piss poor too, so much so that Lapkik was one of their leading tacklers. So, Cain is a big loss, and like it or not, losing a guy like Lapkik who solved a clear problem Clemson was having on ST, also hurts.


I'll give myself some props for calling the loss of Clemson's coke-head kicker as a potential problem for their Special Teams. The starting kicker had nothing but a "warning track" leg as he could barely get it to the EZ. When that began to be a problem during the regular season, coke head stepped up and handled the kick off duties and started blasting them through the end zone. Given the 1 star walk on plays last night, Deon Cain wasn't missed. Rather, it was the coke head kicker was the biggest loss of all the suspended Clemson players.
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46122 posts
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:52 pm to
Wasn't their only missed FG blocked?


And not the kickers fault guys don't make tackle on kick coverage
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 1/12/16 at 4:56 pm to
quote:


And not the kickers fault guys don't make tackle on kick coverage



Sure

But if the other guy can boot it out the endzone then nothing to worry about
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram