- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:42 pm to boosiebadazz
I wonder if that dude was Chicken's people 
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:43 pm to Kracka
Stat building to justify their republican created welfare jobs similar too all the fake terrorist plots they thwart by kidding some poor semi retard 0arab to agree to blow up shite in exchange for a bucket of chicken
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:49 pm to threeputt
quote:
some of you guys have no clue about copyright laws
who?
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:53 pm to LfcSU3520
the people who are saying that this is stupid and that they hate the govt.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:55 pm to threeputt
I'm not saying it was stupid. Or that I hate the gov. However, I defy you to show me how my watching a show that was not hosted in my area in any fashion other than channelsurfing cost any of the copyright owners one single fing penny.
This post was edited on 3/5/11 at 10:56 pm
Posted on 3/5/11 at 10:58 pm to threeputt
oh ok.
But I do agree with the guy talking about out of market games that he couldn't get any other way.
But I do agree with the guy talking about out of market games that he couldn't get any other way.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:06 pm to Htown Tiger
how long before justin tv gets shut down? 
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:11 pm to pioneerbasketball
It's not like he was charging people for viewership.
Would it be illegal for me to pay for a NFL game or another sports league game and view it on my laptop and use a detachable webcam to show a friend that I am watching the game? Same concept basically.
Would it be illegal for me to pay for a NFL game or another sports league game and view it on my laptop and use a detachable webcam to show a friend that I am watching the game? Same concept basically.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:16 pm to threeputt
quote:
the people who are saying that this is stupid and that they hate the govt.
I understand copy right laws completely, but for just regular tv shows... frick that. I pay my cable bill, so I have no problem watching them online to see episodes that I missed.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:19 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
Would it be illegal for me to pay for a NFL game or another sports league game and view it on my laptop and use a detachable webcam to show a friend that I am watching the game? Same concept basically.
it would be illegal if you stood to profit by it in any way. in the case of this website, by ad revenue.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:43 pm to boosiebadazz
Homeland security was also responsible for shutting down several hip-hop blogs not too long ago for posting leaks to songs and such. Just fwiw.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:44 pm to threeputt
quote:
some of you guys have no clue about copyright laws
The material wasn't hosted on his site. Unless the owner's of google, yahoo, bing and so on are getting tossed in jail then this is just a witch hunt.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:47 pm to philabuck
quote:
The material wasn't hosted on his site. Unless the owner's of google, yahoo, bing and so on are getting tossed in jail then this is just a witch hunt.
People who provide weapons or a plan for someone to be murdered, but don't do the actual killing should not be penalized according to this argument. I know it's an extreme comparison, and I don't like Channel Surfing going down either, but it's a flawed argument.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 11:47 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
it would be illegal if you stood to profit by it in any way. in the case of this website, by ad revenue.
see i can actually understand that.. i don't think you should profit off what is not yours..
but like as far as me just showing something that i paid for.. i don't see how it's any different than everyone coming over to my place to watch it..
Posted on 3/6/11 at 12:49 am to SouljaBreauxTellEm
What is the difference between channel surfing and going to a bar and watching the game? You aren't paying for it either way.
Posted on 3/6/11 at 12:51 am to Rebels1234
that channel surfing website attracted viewers with the stuff they were making available to view. and because of how many viewers the got, companies paid the website to advertise on the website.
Posted on 3/6/11 at 2:59 am to Rebels1234
Bars pay a percentage based on their capacity
Posted on 3/6/11 at 3:02 am to Rebels1234
quote:
What is the difference between channel surfing and going to a bar and watching the game?
The UFC charges bars a commercial rate to show their PPV's. Their is a big difference to whoever is providing the content whether you watch online or in a bar.
Posted on 3/6/11 at 6:01 am to lsu223
I still fail to see how Homeland Security has frick all to do with the rebroadcast of mostly European soccer fixtures. It was my understanding DHS was for catching terrorists and preventing terrorists from striking the U.S.A
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News