Started By
Message

re: BCS: Justice Department antitrust attorneys want to meet with us

Posted on 6/3/11 at 2:37 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

That's a big part of it.

how do they plan on doing that, when the organization and institutions are non-profit?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

That's a big part of it.

and why isn't teh IRS investigating this?
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30290 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 2:42 pm to
Memo to SC..B!tches..Snitches..Ditches..Signed Bill Hancock.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

that's EXACTLY what the old system was too

it just wasn't as organized in doing so

and BCS money isn't a big deal


Were the old bowl games inflating their financial windfall by fraudulently advertising their game as as the "national championship game" irrespective to the opinions or accomplishments of all others inside the large and diverse canopy of CFB?
This post was edited on 6/3/11 at 3:04 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Were the old bowl games inflating their financial windfall by fraudulently advertising their game as as the "national championship game"

yes

for example:

1996 CFB Season wiki

quote:

National championship 1997 Sugar Bowl


there are other examples
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:10 pm to
and the BCS national title is the BCS/Coaches' Poll title game. that is how it is advertised

nothing has prevented the AP from choosing a different champ than the BCS

and this includes years like 2007 and 2008
This post was edited on 6/3/11 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

yes

for example:

1996 CFB Season wiki

quote:
National championship 1997 Sugar Bowl



there are other examples


No, that's different...just like the 1987 Fiesta. It wasn't a manufactured system before the season began.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

No, that's different.

no it's not

it just doesn't fit your argument

quote:

It wasn't a manufactured system before the season began.

the link between bowls and conferences was set, just like it is today
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

and the BCS national title is the BCS/Coaches' Poll title game. that is how it is advertised

nothing has prevented the AP from choosing a different champ than the BCS

and this includes years like 2007 and 2008


So you admit, what gives the BCS their weight/legitimacy is the coaches poll?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

So you admit, what gives the BCS their weight/legitimacy is the coaches poll?

i'm not speaking of "legitimacy"

the coaches poll and the 6 major conferences got together and got a sweet tv deal with ABC/FOX (it helps that the coaches poll is via a disney subsidiary like ABC) to televise the historically-backed major bowls. this association was the BCS. these bowls became BCS bowls, these conferences became BCS conferences.

that's it. they offer exhibitions games called bowls, which are part of CFB, and have been for decades

that's it. that's the "evil BCS"

a collection of conferences who got a sweet tv deal to air 5 exhibition games, with 1 being the national championship as decided by the group (which a poll is bound to honor)

when you explain what the BCS actually is, it is a lot less evil than people like you try to make it
This post was edited on 6/3/11 at 3:19 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36112 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:21 pm to
quote:



So you admit, what gives the BCS their weight/legitimacy is the coaches poll?



the title game is generally deemed legitimate because it generally does a good job of matching up the best two teams in a game (conventional wisdom rules RE: the word best tho)

obviously there are people who disagree... but there are people who disagree with every system for declaring a champion... college basketball for example has too large of a pool according to critics such as myself

seems like a sidebar discussion to the earlier point tho - the BCS is not terribly different from the system that immediately preceded it

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

the title game is generally deemed legitimate because it generally does a good job of matching up the best two teams in a game

and the champ is almost always essentially universally recognized as the #1 team

that's why there has been so few disagreements b/c the BCS and independent AP poll

Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:39 pm to
No system where the crowning final poll is a rubber-stamp by contractual obligation or where a pollster is obligated to do a complete 180 from his previous non-contractual opinion is a system that should be endorsed as legitimate...unless we want to slouch further towards a banana-republic.
This post was edited on 6/3/11 at 3:40 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

No system where the crowning final poll is a rubber-stamp by contractual obligation or where a pollster is obligated to do a complete 180 from his previous non-contractual opinion is a system that should be endorsed as legitimate

the frick?

why not? it's just a poll. not a death sentence

quote:

unless we want to slouch further towards a banana-republic.

what do you even mean?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36112 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:46 pm to
quote:


No system where the crowning final poll is a rubber-stamp by contractual obligation or where a pollster is obligated to do a complete 180 from his previous non-contractual opinion is a system that should be endorsed as legitimate...unless we want to slouch further towards a banana-republic.


a banana republic?

yeah, I'm sure historians will look back on American culture... and conclude the moment we started to slide was when people had to vote the winner of a championship game the champion... even when their prior opinion contradicted that result

Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 3:48 pm to
You don't see the absurdity in that? If opinion is all we have in these polls - what do you have when even opinion is taken away? What does that final coaches poll even mean but the final representation and manifestation of a business arrangement.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

If opinion is all we have in these polls - what do you have when even opinion is taken away?

it's just an irrelevant point

i don't care if the BCS title is associated with any human poll's official championship

it's absurd to think that the BCS would pass muster in your eyes if it wasn't associated with the coach's poll
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 10:06 pm to

quote:

it's just an irrelevant point

i don't care if the BCS title is associated with any human poll's official championship




So where is the BCS getting its authority to crown a champion...what's the weight behind the crystal ball? The polls only matter when it suits your agenda? Brilliant and toothless.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36112 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 10:38 pm to
are you under teh impression that the BCS has only one component? it seems like it

I think to many people the legitimacy of the BCS springs from a couple reasons:

1) it was an improvement over the old system where #1 and #2 (whatever your poll or ranking) were not obligated to meet

2) it was an attempt to use opinion and computer polls together to give the best possible chance of matching up the top two teams
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422428 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

So where is the BCS getting its authority to crown a champion.

it's a collection of conferences who crown a champion

where did tigerdroppings get authority to crown its champion?

quote:

The polls only matter when it suits your agenda?

when did i say this?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram