- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:15 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Worst NFL starters win by 40
And now we have proof that Bama would win. Thanks as always Verlander.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:17 pm to bobbyray21
quote:
People are a bit trigger happy on this particular hypo.
Under the hypothetical presented, Bama would have the more talented team. If you dispute this, be ready to answer the following questions:
1. How many players on Bama's team are likely to be NFL starters
1a. on defense
1b. on offense
The answer to 1a is probably 15. The coach of this hypothetical team would be RETARDED if he declined an offer to trade his defense for Bama's defense straight up.
And, again, before you knee-jerk respond with some mindless drivel about grown men...actually think about the quality of players on both sides. Draw from history and look at past CFB teams with great defenses and then see how many players on those teams weren't merely middling starters in the NFL, but were fricking studs.
Hell, I can think of bad UT teams that had 3-4 GOOD NFL starters on a single side of the ball. Was Jerod Mayo better than the worst NFL starting linebacker when he was a Junior at UT? Well of course he was you fricking dumbasses? He was starting 6 months later and won rookie of the year. Same goes for Eric Berry. Hell, same goes for Denarius Moore. And I'm talking about TERRIBLE UT teams.
Anybody who dismisses this hypothetical and says that he NFL team rolls easily needs to stop with the fricking grouptink and actually think abotu the question being asked.
So you're saying you'd take Bama's D right now over a defense made up the worst STARTERS in the NFL? Fo realz?
Not to mention that the worst NFL offensive players coached by Sean Payton would work Nick and he defense silly. Bama doesn't have the horses to defend a wide open NFL offense man.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:19 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Sweet baby Jesus make it stop. Somebody please make it stop. LSU on Saturday, I'm praying, just make it stop
Notice this topic was yet again started by an LSU fan.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:21 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Brandon "Don't call me Joss" Weedon.
Dude, get the frick out, right now. Seriously!
Go look up some fricking stats before you start spouting shite out of your arse!
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:21 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
We don't know any of this by watching them against college teams. The transition to the league is night and day.
Everyone was going to be a star on the 2004 USC team...and nope...most of the great college D-line weren't stars or even starters and the receivers and skill players.
You never know how people translate to the Pros.
Hell, for that matter, name one Bama player making an impact in the NFL right now.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:22 pm to Ric Flair
Bama would have a shot at the worst 22 NFL starters.
Think about it.
Many of the guys on Alabama's team are going to play in the NFL.
Many of those guys will be starters.
And some of their players will be better than the "worst starters" in the NFL.
Some might even be stars.
They may be able to compete.
Think about it.
Many of the guys on Alabama's team are going to play in the NFL.
Many of those guys will be starters.
And some of their players will be better than the "worst starters" in the NFL.
Some might even be stars.
They may be able to compete.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:23 pm to Ric Flair
So if LSU wins can they beat an NFL team?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:24 pm to Carlton Banks
quote:
Bama would have a shot at the worst 22 NFL starters.
Think about it.
Many of the guys on Alabama's team are going to play in the NFL.
Many of those guys will be starters.
And some of their players will be better than the "worst starters" in the NFL.
Some might even be stars.
They may be able to compete.
Again, name me the Bama players running shite in the league right now.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:26 pm to Carlton Banks
Carlton, you're a good poster.....I can't believe some of y'all are even debating this or considering Bama.
Alabama doesn't have 22 nfl starters on their entire roster. They probably don't even have 22 guys who will play in the nfl for a couple years. Even if you take Alabama's current team, let them workout, gameplan, grow stronger/better for the next 7 years, they'd still get blown out
Alabama doesn't have 22 nfl starters on their entire roster. They probably don't even have 22 guys who will play in the nfl for a couple years. Even if you take Alabama's current team, let them workout, gameplan, grow stronger/better for the next 7 years, they'd still get blown out
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:30 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Alabama doesn't have 22 nfl starters on their entire roster.
Yes they do
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:32 pm to TreyAnastasio
No they don't. I don't think 2001 Miami even had 22 nfl starters. Has any team ever had 22 nfl starters at one time??
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:33 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
We don't know any of this by watching them against college teams. The transition to the league is night and day.
Everyone was going to be a star on the 2004 USC team...and nope...most of the great college D-line weren't stars or even starters and the receivers and skill players.
You never know how people translate to the Pros.
What do you mean you never know? Look to teams from the past 10 years or so. You think there haven't been CFB defenses that had 11+ NFL starters on their 2-deep roster?
Hint: there have been plenty.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:35 pm to bobbyray21
Name some please....
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:36 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
No they don't. I don't think 2001 Miami even had 22 nfl starters. Has any team ever had 22 nfl starters at one time??
Do they need to?
What defense is better:
(a) the worst 11 starters in the NfL, or
(b) 5 pro bowlers, 4 above average players, adn 2 guys that arent' good enough to start on another team
Which defense would you choose?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:36 pm to HoLeInOnEr05
quote:
Dude, get the frick out, right now. Seriously!
Go look up some fricking stats before you start spouting shite out of your arse!
Weeden is 33rd in the league in DYAR and 32nd in DVOA. His rating from ESPN is 33rd in the league. His traditional rating is 70.8, which puts him about 32nd in the league. The only starting QB with a lower completion percentage than him is Mark fricking Sanchez.
So please, enlighten me about how Weeden isn't in the conversation for worst starting QB.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:38 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Yes they do
C'mon man, stop trolling here.
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:39 pm to bobbyray21
Dude, I really hope you're trolling me right now. Congrats.....you got me good
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:39 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
No they don't. I don't think 2001 Miami even had 22 nfl starters. Has any team ever had 22 nfl starters at one time??
Someone posted in the other thread that Bama put 28 players in the league OVER THE LAST 4 YEARS.
Now, not all of those guys are starters. So do people think that this current Bama team, which many believe is NOT as good as previous Bama teams, has more NFL quality players and thus more starters than what's currently out there?
WTF?
Posted on 11/1/12 at 12:41 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
No they don't. I don't think 2001 Miami even had 22 nfl starters. Has any team ever had 22 nfl starters at one time??
You really dont think that on bamas 85 man roster there arent 22 guys who are going to start in the NFL?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News