- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
9 in 10 Native Americans not bothered by Redskins Name
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:37 am
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:37 am
quote:
Nine in 10 Native Americans say they are not offended by the Washington Redskins name, according to a new Washington Post poll that shows how few ordinary Indians have been persuaded by a national movement to change the football team’s moniker.
The survey of 504 people across every state and the District reveals that the minds of Native Americans have remained unchanged since a 2004 poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center found the exact same result. Responses to The Post’s questions about the issue were broadly consistent regardless of age, income, education, political party or proximity to reservations.
Your move white guilt
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:38 am to Glorious
We've seen how they stick up for .0001% of people that are LGBT* .. This a whole 10%!
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:39 am to Glorious
I will not rest until the Irish are no longer a mascot. How dare you, Notre Dame.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:40 am to Glorious
I'm shocked that the Post brass allowed this to be published
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:42 am to Glorious
But...but....but....Buzzfeed said.....
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:44 am to Glorious
and 1 out of 10 all americans are liberal pussies offended by anything. makes sense.
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:48 am to Glorious
who cares what they think? I'll let old white men in suits tell me what I should or shouldn't be offended by.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 9:54 am to Glorious
I worked with several native guys and their response was basically "we have much larger issues facing our community than the name of a football team."
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:00 am to Glorious
That's the thing about white liberals.
They don't care that most native Americans are not offended.
They just think that they should be and are therefore offended for them.
Typical of the paternalistic nature of much of their thought processes.
They don't care that most native Americans are not offended.
They just think that they should be and are therefore offended for them.
Typical of the paternalistic nature of much of their thought processes.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:00 am to Glorious
Today's world is dictated by the vocal minority.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:11 am to LMfan
quote:
but this survey has some poor methodology.
Can you please explain the "poor methodology"?
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:27 am to NoNameTiger
quote:
Typical of the paternalistic nature of much of their thought processes
I've been trying to tell people this for a long time. Getting offended on behalf of someone else is degrading and insulting to them. The liberal outrage and white knighting for others is so hypocritical.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:33 am to Glorious
The only people who care about this are people who stand to make a name and money for themselves.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:40 am to bbrownso
quote:
Can you please explain the "poor methodology"?
Sure. It's a survey, surveys are prone to all sorts of issues which can affect the validity of the study. Among them:
- Response bias due to the phrasing of the question (a five level Likert scale would have been more precise, but still prone to issues)
- not a large enough sample to be considered representative of the NA population
- sample was pulled out of convenience, ie people who were easy to reach via cell phone
- participants were asked to self identify as NA
quote:
"The poll, which has a 5.5 percentage-point margin of sampling error, was conducted by randomly calling cellular and landline phones. It asked questions only of people who identified themselves as Native American, after being asked about their ethnicity or heritage."
Not exactly the most scientific study here. It is interesting though and worth considering.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 10:43 am to Glorious
Doesn't matter if the native people offended are 10 out of 10, 1 out of 10, or 0 out of 10. The white SJWs will always be offended on their behalf so the debate will rage on
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:08 am to LMfan
quote:
Sure. It's a survey, surveys are prone to all sorts of issues which can affect the validity of the study. Among them:
- Response bias due to the phrasing of the question (a five level Likert scale would have been more precise, but still prone to issues)
- not a large enough sample to be considered representative of the NA population
- sample was pulled out of convenience, ie people who were easy to reach via cell phone
- participants were asked to self identify as NA
I agree that the methods were suspect, but it was conducted at the behest of an online blog/newspaper.
What is telling is that it mirrors the results of a survey conducted 5 years ago, so I believe it's more right than wrong.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:22 am to ShoeBang
quote:
I've been trying to tell people this for a long time. Getting offended on behalf of someone else is degrading and insulting to them. The liberal outrage and white knighting for others is so hypocritical.
And getting offended over an issue that has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU OR YOUR CULTURE because a member of that culture was actually offended by it makes even less sense.
"I'm sick of these pussy liberals being offended by everything, so I'm going to run to the MSB every time something happens to tell on them." How can that not be more pussified than what they're bitching about?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News