- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #11 UCLA 60 vs #6 SMU 59 | Final | TruTV
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:30 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:30 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
The guy that touched it had a perfect line on it. Common sense tells you a guy wouldn't interfere like that unless he could tell it was a clear airball. The very slow motion replay seems to support that.
A. you can't review it (apparently)
B. The refs don't get the benefit of "very slow motion" to make the call live. Sans replay, it looked like goaltending right away
2
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:30 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:
That ball would have hit the rim. I hate it, but it's goaltending.
Check the side angle.
No it wouldn't.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:31 pm to Alt26
quote:When I saw it live, I was certain that it was goaltending, so I can't fault an official for seeing it the same way. That said, replay makes it look highly unlikely that the ball was flying rim-ward.
Sans replay, it looked like goaltending right away
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:32 pm to WestCoastAg
Bill Walton voice:
The Conference of Champions just getting started my friends
The Conference of Champions just getting started my friends
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:32 pm to ballscaster
quote:
That said, replay makes it look highly unlikely that the ball was flying rim-ward.
The side angle is the dead giveaway.
If you see that replay and continue to argue that the right call was made, then you are just stubborn.
That being said, I guess you have to be smarter if you're the SMU guy.
Did Larry Brown have a timeout? You have to use it and settle your guys down there.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:33 pm to UNO
quote:
Check the side angle.
No it wouldn't.
Check the top angle.
Yes it would.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:34 pm to ShamelessPel
He's such a blowhard. A guy that has been known to flex when his team wins.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:34 pm to emmanuellewis
quote:The UCLA coaches and players reacted to it right away before the ref even blew the whistle.
That was a terrible call that you never see made. UCLA would not have even been complaining had they played on.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:35 pm to UNO
quote:
Did Larry Brown have a timeout? You have to use it and settle your guys down there.
I think he had four, although they got two great shots from their best player so you can't ask for better.
Crazy game. UCLA rolling then a 19-0 run. Alfrod gets them within striking distance, they don't foul to extend the game (absolutely the wrong call), and get bailed out by a bad call. Both teams made plays and gave away points at the end there. Didn't even mention the 2 crazy turnovers.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:35 pm to im4LSU
quote:
Check the top angle.
Yes it would.
The top angle is like the last angle you want to use to make that judgement.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:36 pm to emmanuellewis
quote:uh the bench and all of the players on the floor called for the goaltending immediately
UCLA would not have even been complaining had they played on.
This post was edited on 3/19/15 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:38 pm to UNO
quote:Probably. Tough one for the officials. It looked exactly like goal tending. Any one of us would have made that call.
If you see that replay and continue to argue that the right call was made, then you are just stubborn.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:38 pm to Alt26
When I first saw it, it looked to me like the ball was shot too far and went over the front edge of the rim and missed the rim completely.
Then they called goaltending and showed the overhead view and I started second guessing.
But after seeing it from other angles, I think my original hunch was right. The ball was shot past the rim when he touched it.
Then they called goaltending and showed the overhead view and I started second guessing.
But after seeing it from other angles, I think my original hunch was right. The ball was shot past the rim when he touched it.
This post was edited on 3/19/15 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:41 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Probably. Tough one for the officials. It looked exactly like goal tending. Any one of us would have made that call.
That's like a quarterback throwing the ball 60 yards down field and getting a pass interference call on a ball his receiver had no chance to catch.
That ball isn't going in. Not coming close.
But that's the rules. Still, in the end, that wasn't the right call.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:45 pm to UNO
quote:
But that's the rules
The rule is that if it's in the cylinder or is going to hit the rim, it's goaltending.
Since you seem to agree it wasn't going to hit the rim, it WASN'T the right call. But I agree with previous posters that it was a tough bang-bang call in real time.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:50 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
The rule is that if it's in the cylinder or is going to hit the rim, it's goaltending.
Exactly. Hitting the rim is not important if it in not "in the cylinder". fricking terrible call.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:50 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Since you seem to agree it wasn't going to hit the rim, it WASN'T the right call.
Yes, I agree.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 4:51 pm to Chucktown_Badger
the official that called it was in a bad position to even call it.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News