Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

11 Reasons Steph Curry Wouldn’t Have Lasted in the ’90s NBA

Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:50 pm
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29176 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:50 pm
LINK

quote:

The Warriors got their asses kicked by the Thunder last night. It was a murder scene. A beatdown. The type of game that the Warriors were accustomed to being on the receiving end of before Steph Curry turned into a glitch in the NBA matrix. But despite the fact that the Dubs trail in the series 2-1 (the last time that happened, they ended up coming back to beat the Cavs for the NBA title), it goes without saying that Steph is still the NBA's current reigning "Best Player Alive." Despite that, all season there's been talk that Steph, and by extension the Warriors, would have struggled in the NBA of the '90s. One reason for that is that the game is less physical these days.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:51 pm to
Is Steph a better player than his father is the next asinine question to be seen on the MSB...
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127414 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:51 pm to
Refreshing takes.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83937 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:55 pm to
LOL
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71426 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:56 pm to
Hot take!
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
4792 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:00 pm to
Why is it so hard for people to just enjoy greatest? Curry is great just let him be great.
Posted by Ingeneious
Member since May 2015
216 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:01 pm to
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

and by extension the Warriors, would have struggled in the NBA of the '90s. One reason for that is that the game is less physical these days


I feel like this is the stupidest sports debate of all time.

If the Warriors play in the 90s against the 96 Bulls, they're losing bad. If the 96 Bulls play in today's league, 6 players foul out and the tempo of today's game throws them off. Comparing players/teams from different eras in terms of "what would they do if they played in this time period" is beyond stupid and pointless. Teams are assembled to win in the here and now. Players always find an edge in any era. Of course the Warriors aren't as physical as great teams in the 90s, but they don't have to be to have success today. Not being assembled like teams 20+ years ago doesn't invalidate greatness. It's the ultimate "Get off my lawn" take.
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 8:05 pm
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Comparing players/teams from different eras in terms of "what would they do if they played in this time period" is beyond stupid and pointless.


This
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:10 pm to
Very few players would be capable of transcending eras and be just as dominate as they were in their era.

The game evolves and changes, many great players in their day were great because they were perfectly adapted for that era. Nothing wrong with that.

With that said, how many people actually clicked the link and realized this was a tongue in cheek article and not what the OP framed it as??
Posted by AUatWashandLee
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2014
664 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:30 pm to
I'm gonna apologize for down voting before I read the article. That was actually pretty good
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
29047 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:42 pm to
GQ, podna? Seriously?

SMH
Posted by Kneehigh
Low Country
Member since Nov 2012
13253 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:48 pm to
Curry is a fricking pussy...
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35536 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Despite that, all season there's been talk that Steph, and by extension the Warriors, would have struggled in the NBA of the 84-94 seasons. One reason for that is that the game is less physical these days.


FIFY

Don't equate the late 90's to physical...Jordan could walk to the rim as if it were a dunk contest.

Jordan got manhandled in the 80's - from Celtics to Pistons. And Jordan won his first two titles the hard way. But then things changed.
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 9:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram