Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Trading in a vehicle every couple years vs leasing

Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:00 pm
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
7492 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:00 pm
Overhead a conversation where an older guy saying that he has always just traded in his trucks for newer ones over the years. He said the first one he paid down quickly and had equity. He was saying he doesn't trade too much up and he ends up financing the same amount and his note stays below $300.

This seems like an interesting strategy vs leasing.
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6534 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:03 pm to
How does having a note in perpetuity seem
interesting or desirable?
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:10 pm to
I don't ever consider having "equity" in a vehicle

Just an expense.

I'm more of a get a vehicle and drive it until it blows up kind of guy
Posted by LSUtigerME
Walker, LA
Member since Oct 2012
3795 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:11 pm to
It's the primary reason to lease.

Leasing should reduce the cash flow required in this situation. Provided he meets the mileage and maintenance requirements (leasing a work truck that will incur jobsite damage is not a great idea).

If planning to keep a vehicle long term, or buying used, leasing is not financially competitive. But if you trade in often for a new vehicle, it can make a lot of sense.
Posted by LSU6262
Member since Jun 2008
7492 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

How does having a note in perpetuity seem
interesting or desirable?


It's not desirable to me, but I find it interesting that this guy wants a new vehicle every year and trades in instead of leasing
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9800 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 1:04 pm to
When someone talks about "equity" in a vehicle....

I would not hire him as a financial advisor.
Posted by Devenbaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
291 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 1:17 pm to
For those not understanding the concept of replacing vehicles frequently, some companies who provide a car allowance require the car be no older than 4/5 model years and must have under a certain amount of miles (ex. 100k). I'm not saying this is the reason for this particular gentlemen's reasoning, but it is fairly common for those who use their vehicle for work.

The other reason could be the guy has a lot of disposable income and likes the new car smell. I know a guy who owns outright a few houses and has plenty of money invested. He also enjoys getting a new car every 12 months.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50342 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 1:26 pm to
depends on the type of vehicle too, I don't know the leasing situation for trucks, other vehicles such as BMW's have great leasing program because its a core part of their business strategy to feed into their CPO program.
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
8966 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

mileage


This is what matters. Either you are low mileage enough to take advantage of leasing or you are not.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12757 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

depends on the type of vehicle too, I don't know the leasing situation for trucks, other vehicles such as BMW's have great leasing program because its a core part of their business strategy to feed into their CPO program.




This. Some cars lease great, and some horribly.

Also, there's nothing wrong with wanting a new car every few years. With as much time as some people spend in their cars, it makes sense to want all the latest n greatest bells & whistles.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 11:09 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20444 posts
Posted on 8/21/17 at 10:30 am to
The main issue not mentioned, is sales tax. In most states you only pay sales tax on a lease on your payments. So on say a $50k car that really adds up! 10% sales tax would be $5,000. If you are paying that every 2 years as opposed to say $1,000-1500 on a $10,000-15,000 lease cost?

If all else is the same as in your mileage and usage would work with a lease, you would be better off leasing due to no sales tax upon purchase many times not to mention the huge hit in depreciation.

Now, if you want a "newish" car regularly and drive higher miles then you can do very well by getting 2-3 old vehicles with $20-40k miles and trading them back in when they hit 75-80kish miles.
Posted by achenator
Member since Oct 2014
2945 posts
Posted on 8/21/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

The main issue not mentioned, is sales tax. In most states you only pay sales tax on a lease on your payments. So on say a $50k car that really adds up! 10% sales tax would be $5,000. If you are paying that every 2 years as opposed to say $1,000-1500 on a $10,000-15,000 lease cost?

In many states you get tax value on your trade. If you pay 50k and trade in for 30, you get 3k or so off the taxes of your new car. You are paying taxes on the depreciation of the car, same as a lease.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98182 posts
Posted on 8/21/17 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I'm more of a get a vehicle and drive it until it blows up kind of guy


Fine if you just use it around town. I'm wary of making a big trip in a high mileage vehicle.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram