Started By
Message

re: conventional vs post tension slabs?

Posted on 3/14/14 at 10:33 pm to
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65540 posts
Posted on 3/14/14 at 10:33 pm to
Conventional steel is reinforcing from Day One, a PT slab has no active reinforcement until the stressing is done, normally after a week or so.

Comparing a PT and conventional slab both done half-assed, the conventional wins every time. If there is any problem with any part of the PT slab, the entire slab is compromised and no engineer would stand behind it or authorize a repair. This is not necessarily true with conventional reinforced slabs. They can be patched or cut and repaired. This is very difficult to do on a PT. house slab.

Risk:Reward? Conventional is easily worth a premium of 5-10%.
This post was edited on 3/14/14 at 10:36 pm
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37317 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 7:42 am to
quote:

re: conventional vs post tension slabs? (Posted on 3/14/14 at 10:10 pm to urinetrouble) quote: Post-tensioned done properly should not be cheaper than conventional. Why? Here are my numbers from the quotes Conventional material quote(wire,rebar)-$4000 Concrete 160 yds * $92/yd = $14,720 Total = $18,720 Post tention material+eng(cables)-$4,800 Concrete 140 yds * $92/yd = $12,880 Total = $17,680


You do not have sales tax figured on your concrete pricing nor do you have labor for concrete placement in your analysis, fwiw.
Posted by vettegc
Livingston
Member since Dec 2006
495 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

You do not have sales tax figured on your concrete pricing nor do you have labor for concrete placement in your analysis, fwiw.


You are right about the sales tax on the concrete. So The labor price on the form and finish will be the same. PT will end up being about $2000 cheaper overall.
I want to know who has seen foundation issues with PT. Dont just say its overkill or you dont trust it.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65540 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 3:58 pm to
(Puts hand up in air)

One bad concrete load ruins entire slab.
You can't cheaply effect a fix, it's a system which has to have no defects.

Poorly consolidated concrete around PT anchors.

PT cables missing, misplaced, misrouted, cut or otherwise compromised.

Huge full-depth cracks in slab occurring before stressing. Does stressing "heal" them? I wouldn't want a slab like that.

It isn't enough difference between them to risk the lesser quality option. We have 150 years+ of conventional slab history to look back on; how does PT age? Not well if chlorides are present in the concrete.

Ask WalMart's Construction division what they think of PT.
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2913 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

PT cables missing, misplaced, misrouted, cut or otherwise compromised.


Isn't this one of the reasons why there pre-pour inspections are done?
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2913 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:45 am to
quote:

However, that being said, ensuring a properly compacted subgrade and avoiding expansive soils are more critical in most cases.


Avoiding expansive soils is a pretty difficult task to do here in Louisiana, but residential PT slabs are still very common regardless. I would think the most critical thing to do is for the owner to spend the money to have a soils test done to confirm the sub-surface conditions and provide the results to the engineer so he can design a site-specific foundation system accordingly. Having this information will decrease the chances of having foundation issues down the road.
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 8:56 pm to
You can work the estimates, but every PT slab I have done has been over dug. Another poster hit it on the head, but reading further it needs to be said again. What works on paper, generally 12" wide footings for PT, rarely happens in real life. The footing will be 14"-16". Surface cracking in res. construction is part of life. The cost of keeping cracks to a minimum is too high. That said I would still do PT if the clay was very fat and expansive.
Posted by eng08
Member since Jan 2013
5997 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:15 pm to
If you want the slab dug to the proper size then you have to be there bitching and measuring.

Also, good luck getting the concrete to achieve the correct slump. Most residential crews will not work with a low slump mix.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65540 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 10:15 pm to
Upgrading the concrete mix to a mix design which is designed for a higher slump is better than bitching at one's finishers for placing too high slump concrete.

The cost of an upgrade to add a high-range water reducing chemical to the concrete mix is usually only around $4-$5 per cubic yard. This will allow your foundation crew to be as stupid as is the usual norm on pour day and not compromise the concrete strength or workability.
Posted by TIGER2
Mandeville.La
Member since Jan 2006
10486 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 10:17 pm to
I built a home in 03 and asked the PT company a lot of questions. One was about commercial slabs that they had done in the past. They had done none and conventional has a great track record. just my two cents.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20506 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Avoiding expansive soils is a pretty difficult task to do here in Louisiana, but residential PT slabs are still very common regardless.


Not really, considering the vast majority of houses don't have problems with expansive soil.

There are known places where it has been a problem, like along Highland Road in Baton Rouge (especially near CCLA), lots of places on the Northshore, and the Jennings/Crowley area, for example.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram