Started By
Message

re: Bit Coins...Buyer's market or not?

Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:18 pm to
He left you out of his mushy post about loving me and vols. You mad brah.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

So, what is the next step for BTC?


Right now, bitcoin is transitioning from amateur hour to venture capitalist boom. The existing exchanges will likely be pushed out of business by well funded new ventures like Coinsetter, among others, that will be more on the up and up with the legal processes required to remain in business.

This will allow the public the gain confidence in bitcoin as it grows.

quote:

How does it make the transformation to untouchable?


Eventually we're going to see two things happen:

1. Decentralized exchange networks will develop. This will make it easier to get money into and out of bitcoin more anonymously than the VC backed exchanges I mentioned before.

2. The need for exchanges will diminish. As the bitcoin economy grows, the need for exchanging USD (or other fiat) into bitcoin will become less and less. Why exchange into USD when you can just directly pay a merchant with BTC? Or, why take fiat and buy BTC with it when you can just get paid directly in BTC for your labor?


Once #2 happens, it's over for governments. Right now, the exchanges are the choke point, and that's where you'll see governments concentrate their actions, but they will ultimately be unsuccessful at stopping the revolutionary change that is happening. And I readily admit that it may not be bitcoin that survives, but some form of decentralized crypto-currency will.
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 4:22 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:22 pm to
I'd be pissed if he had included me.

Once he refuses to reply directly to your posts he will start excluding you as his new best friend, too. The way you accomplish that achievement is to bitch slap him so many times he goes into a permanent pout.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Once #2 happens, it's over for governments.


You serious Clark?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68117 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

I readily admit that it may not be bitcoin that survives


Yes, you have been consistent with this.

Someone has to play the Wright brothers' role.

Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Once he refuses to reply directly to your posts he will start excluding you as his new best friend, too.


No way he ever considers me a friend. Nor should he.

I'm not friends with any of you idiots.
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 4:27 pm
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:27 pm to
Yes, I do think it should be a crime. Facilitating others to hide their criminal activity is worth suppressing. The law is clear on the requirements for businesses engaging in money transfers for customers, and MtGox filed a fraudulent application seeking to avoid following the law.

Same sort of penalties as Michael Milken was subjected to.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

that will be more on the up and up with the legal processes required to remain in business.

This will allow the public the gain confidence in bitcoin as it grows.

So now you've switched sides? Only through government supervision can trust be developed in bitcoin by the public?

Interesting....

.
quote:

Once #2 happens, it's over for governments

So the government's supervision of bitcoin exchanges which, as you've posted, will create trust in bitcoin by the public, will lead to the government not being able to supervise bitcoin???
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Yes, I do think it should be a crime. Facilitating others to hide their criminal activity is worth suppressing. The law is clear on the requirements for businesses engaging in money transfers for customers, and MtGox filed a fraudulent application seeking to avoid following the law.

Same sort of penalties as Michael Milken was subjected to.


Thanks, Poodle, for going on record!
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

No way he ever considers me a friend. Nor should he.


I'd sit down and drink a pop with you, bro.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

I'm not friends with any of you idiots.

That's Mister Idiot, to you!

Does this mean you're gonna cancel our Ruth's Chris dinner date?
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

That's Mister Idiot, to you!

Does this mean you're gonna cancel our Ruth's Chris dinner date?


No. I will eat a steak with you. But we won't hug it out as friends when we leave. You'll get in your truck and get the frick.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:36 pm to
Unless you're cute.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Once #2 happens, it's over for governments


Ummm, no.

Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:41 pm to
Whose crime was worse...MtGox or HSBC?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69925 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

I'm not friends with any of you idiots.


Well then you can kiss my balls sir
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:44 pm to
I would have to say HSBC. But they paid their 2 billion and are square with the house imo.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65046 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Well then you can kiss my balls sir




I don't count anybody here as an enemy. I just don't agree with some people and I think others are somewhat delusional.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69925 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Whose crime was worse...MtGox or HSBC?



HSBC, but that's kind of a dumb question. We don't know what skeletons are still in the Mt.Gox closet, YET!!! HSBC has also paid $1.9Billion in fines, so far
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69925 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

I don't count anybody here as an enemy. I just don't agree with some people and I think others are somewhat delusional.



Ok, well maybe I overreacted


first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram