Started By
Message

re: What LSU Has To Do To Make The Tourney - as of Feb 15th

Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29862 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:35 pm to
It might dip down to 13 some years, I can't remember it happening but it might have. I know usually it is somewhere around 12 though.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22152 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

I think were you're running into trouble is you're thinking that the NCAA would just go down the standings 1-5 and select those teams in order, i.e.


Aha. I see your point now. I was thinking more along these lines:

1st Deserving SEC Team - In
2nd Deserving SEC Team - In
3rd Deserving SEC Team - In
4th Deserving SEC Team - In
5th Deserving SEC Team - In
6th Deserving SEC Team - Out

We know that UK and UF will get the 1 and 2 spot. I just think LSU will be in if they get to that 5th spot. Lots of variables to consider, but having a top 5 SEC record is one of them.

And I still have to stick with my argument that Bama is the exception to the rule. Your point (and others) about Bama last year is valid.

But that was flat out a mistake on the part of the committee.

And the mistake happened to Bama.

And Bama is located in Birmingham.

And the SEC Conference Headquarters are located in Birmingham.

And politics plays a big part with the Selection Committee.

And all of that is going to help LSU get in...if we win.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29862 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Here is what Joe Lunardi put out today:


WOW, the ACC doesn't deserve 6 this year IMO.
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28878 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:38 pm to
ACC people probably are saying the SEC doesn't deserve 5.

If there are upsets in conference tourneys. The ACC 6 and SEC 5 are probably the first 2 cut.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22378 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:42 pm to
You'll also notice that LSU isn't even on the radar of CBS or SI's bubble watches yesterday. They list all kinds of teams as teams with 'work to do' but don't even bother mentioning LSU. Hell, SI has LSU listed as a 'bad loss' for Alabama. Granted these were done before last night's games, but if you think beating the #49 ranked team in the RPI at home will make any sort of significant changing impact then you're crazy.

SI

ESPN
This post was edited on 2/15/12 at 3:51 pm
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28878 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:45 pm to
let us have our fun. We won 5 SEC games the last 2 seasons combined. We have 5 SEC wins already this year
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29862 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:47 pm to
That is because we needed to win 6 straight for all this to happen in a conference we were sub 500 in by a good bit. That isn't taking into account who we have already played and who we have left.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22378 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 3:48 pm to
No, but you'll see they list basically anybody with any sort of chance. They don't like to be caught off guard in the final five games. There are some teams on there that'll never get in.

quote:

That isn't taking into account who we have already played and who we have left.


Of course it's taken into account who LSU has played. What do you think they base this on? It's updated weekly. And there are plenty of teams on there with losing conference records. They're on there because their non-conference resumes and RPIs are better than LSU's. Some of you are putting entirely too much stock in conference records (I'd reason it's because it's all LSU has going for it, and its based on a hypothetical winning the next five games at that). It's just one of many factors taken into account. RPI and SOS (especially non-conference) are the two main ones, and other things like conference records, records away from home, quality wins, bad losses, etc also playing part.
This post was edited on 2/15/12 at 3:55 pm
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22152 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Some of you are putting entirely too much stock in conference records (I'd reason it's because it's all LSU has going for it, and its based on a hypothetical winning the next five games at that).

LSU has to win basketball games down the stretch to get in the Tourney?

Amazing concept! I might actually try to have fun watching the games now, instead of refreshing my browser to get the latest RPI's.

Does this work with any other sports?
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22378 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:10 pm to
I don't think they have a shot unless the games they win are all the ones in the SECt and they get the auto-bid. Hence why I said some of you put far too much stock in conference record. It's just another measuring stick amongst many, and all the other ones are pretty bad to just downright ugly for LSU.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29862 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Of course it's taken into account who LSU has played


I meant in terms of our conference schedule. It isn't taking into account we have played all of our hard games and the 5 we have left are winnable for us. We were off the radar because we were 3 and 6 in conference a week ago. A 7 game run seemed highly unlikely. If we win out the reg season, I think we will be in. If you disagree that is fine, but that doesn't mean you know more about it then anyone else or that you are right.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22152 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Hence why I said some of you put far too much stock in conference record.

You are missing the point where, if LSU does have a great conference record, they would have won a bunch of basketball games down the stretch.

And winning down the stretch is a "measuring stick" that the committee tends to pay attention too.

Thus, LSU's conference record would help them get into the Tourney because, and I believe this is the techncial term: They'd be wippin' some arse!
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Win 3 of the next 4.

Stopped reading there.

LSU MUST win out. End of story.
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

LSU MUST win out. End of story.


Agreed. Which I do think is possible, but not likely.

Would anyone truly be disappointed with a high NIT seed after the last two years though?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:51 pm to
It sounds crazy but LSU has a legitimate chance of finishing 3rd in the SEC if they win out. Vandy has a tough schedule and could end up 9-7. They are good.. but winning on the road has been difficult this season.
This post was edited on 2/15/12 at 4:52 pm
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29862 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Would anyone truly be disappointed with a high NIT seed after the last two years though?


Making the NIT means nothing to me. I wouldn't be upset if we didn't make the NCAA, but I could care less about the NIT.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22378 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:54 pm to
Here's Lunardi's bubble from his bracket math today:The bubble (34 teams for 15 spots)
IN (15, in S-Curve order):

34-Connecticut, 35-West Virginia, 36-Alabama, 38-Iowa State, 40-Purdue, 41-BYU, 42-Arizona, 43-Illinois, 44-Texas, 45-Kansas State, 46-Seton Hall, 48-Cincinnati, 49-North Carolina State, 50-Miami (FL), 51-Xavier

Those would be the bubble teams that would make the field.


OUT (19, in S-Curve order)
69-Washington, 70-Minnesota, 71-Northwestern, 72-Wyoming, 73-Colorado State, 74-Central Florida, 75-Oregon, 76-Colorado, 77-Saint Joseph's, 78-Dayton, 79-Stanford, 80-Arkansas, 81-Ole Miss, 82-Missouri State, 83-VCU, 84-Massachusetts, 85-South Florida, 86-New Mexico State, 87-South Dakota State

Again, no mention of LSU. Does mention South Dakota State. If any of yall think that LSU has a chance by winning a few more games against average to bad SEC teams (basically all bad in terms of RPI), then your delusional. LSU's only shot is winning the SEC tournament. They could get in the conversation as a longshot if they win out all the way to the SEC title game and then lose, if they beat Kentucky along the way.
Posted by The Truth 34
Chavez Ravine
Member since May 2010
41170 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't be upset if we didn't make the NCAA, but I could care less about the NIT.


just getting some post season experience will be great for this young team. tourney type atmosphere for these guys will only benefit them.

storm and "like a bass" were the only 2 guys on the team in '08 that went to the tourney.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164137 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Again, no mention of LSU.

No mention of LSU because there shouldn't be any mention of LSU from a national guy with us at 15-10, 5-6. But LSU fans are throwing around the idea of us winning out. If LSU wins out Joe WILL be talking about what we need to do during that week before the SEC tournament.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22378 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 5:00 pm to
As an extreme longshot perhaps. With LSU's remaining schedule the RPI won't get much higher than 60 even if they do win out. That doesn't get at-large bids.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram