Started By
Message

re: Truth about Clemson defense that Steele took over

Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:32 am to
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18124 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:32 am to
This is going to be a wait and see hire. He will have better players for sure at LSU. I looked up how many NFL players were on Rosters from the 2011 Clemson defense and it's only 3 and only 1 guy a DL is any real contributor.
Posted by Tigahbader
Nunya
Member since Oct 2014
767 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:37 am to
Clemson IS NOT LSU in terms of the defensive talent they attract...jus sayin.
This post was edited on 1/15/15 at 11:38 am
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
6629 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:37 am to
quote:

There is just to many variables though to make a sound judgment call.



Like the fact that Clempsons Offense was ranked more than 100th in time of possession 2 of those 3 years.

Hard to have a good defense when it's on the field the ENTIRE season.

quote:

Saban liked him enough to bring him back though.


And Saban reportedly called him Tuesday morning begging him to stay... and "Don't get on the plane".
Posted by White Flash
Member since Jan 2015
392 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:41 am to
did sweeney run a faster paced offense than bowden? cause thats when steele became the dc. i wouldnt think sweeneys offense is that great for overall defensive rankings.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10464 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Clemson IS NOT LSU in terms of the defensive talent they attract...jus sayin.


Neither are Vanderbilt or Penn State...yet, somehow, Bob Shoop was able to put together top 20 defenses at those schools.

Elite coaches don't require elite talent to make themselves look good.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20740 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Like the fact that Clempsons Offense was ranked more than 100th in time of possession 2 of those 3 years.


TOP Ranks
102 - 2009
77 - 2010
104 - 2011

2009 - #25 Scoring Defense, #20 Total Defense
2010 - #13 Scoring Defense, #19 Total Defense
2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense

2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP. They don't correlate here. Sorry.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56205 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense
So your telling me that in three short years our D will suck like our O. That should keep from dividing the locker room.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10444 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP. They don't correlate here. Sorry.


People want to believe in excuses for a guy that just screwed it up. His defense was overly complicated, and just like Crowton, he'll do well or okay early (because he won't be able to completely shift to his complex scheme) and as time passes, his scheme will become to complex and players will struggle.

That is most likely what will happen given his history.

At the same time, let's look at Chavis' history at UTk before coming to LSU:

2004 - #38 Scoring, # 45 Total
2005 - #16 Scoring, # 7 Total
2006 - #33 Scoring, #50 Total
2007 - #61 Scoring, #70 Total
2008 - #10 Scoring, # 3 Total

Chavis was up and down, and two years before coming to LSU, UTk's offense carried him to an SEC Championship game despite a horrid defense.

Sometimes bad years happen, and honestly with Steele, you just don't have enough data. 4 years at 2 schools with none better than #19 in total defense is a bit concerning though.
This post was edited on 1/15/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted by I_Geaux_4_LSU
Columbus, GA
Member since Nov 2014
17 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:28 pm to


I get the past has some merit, but prior to LSU...

Nick Saban at Mich St.
1995 6–5–1
1996 6–6
1997 7–5
1998 6–6
1999 9–2

Les Miles at OSU
2001 4–7
2002 8–5
2003 9–4
2004 7–5

Neither records were really impressive, but they were the right 'fit' for the job and both did and are doing pretty good at LSU. And I haven't looked at their records after leaving the respective schools, but I think both schools have better records since they left. It's all about the right person and the right fit and the right situation.

Quit bringing up 70 points and this and that, and wait and see what he does HERE!!!

Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56205 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:34 pm to
you post stats that are like the anti stats of Steele
Posted by fierysnowman
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
1963 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:34 pm to
Guys, relax. Steele will have the very best defensive talent in the country at LSU. He has Orgeron and Raymond to help him shine. Coach O will once again have LSU dominating the line of scrimmage and getting after the qb(which has been sorely lacking under Chavis' watch). This is going to allow all the NFL talent DB's to actually make plays. At Clemson he had exactly one guy who went on to contribute in the NFL
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Guys, relax. Steele will have the very best defensive talent in the country at LSU. He has Orgeron and Raymond to help him shine.


Who were his defensive assistants at Clemson?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56205 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

At Clemson he had exactly one guy who went on to contribute in the NFL
I thought he was a great recruiter?
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18134 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

They lost some good defensive players to the draft the year prior to the downfall so there's that.


uh, yea, that's one of the main jobs of the DC - to recruit talent to play in your defense.

If there's a big dropoff one year due to the NFL draft or graduation, it's the coaches' fault for not having young backups ready to step up.

Graduation and early exits for the draft are both predictable, to a large extent. Coaches get paid big money to anticipate that and prepare for it.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I thought he was a great recruiter?




To be fair, it is mentioned in a Clemson article I read yesterday that Dabo didn't like him dedicating a lot of time to recruiting travel. At FSU he was National Recruiter of the Year when he focused on it.

He is apparently very organized as a recruiter and maybe he can pick the guys he wants, prioritize them, and sick O and Frank on them.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:22 pm to
Just to add more stats to the thread for discussion:


National Rankings per NCAA's statistics database:

2009 (TOP on offense was #105):

#25 Scoring Defense
#20 Total Defense
#7 Pass Defense
#21 Pass Efficiency Defense
#67 Rushing Defense
#12 Tackles for a Loss
#11 Turnovers Gained
#64 3rd Down Defense
#114 Red Zone Defense


2010 (TOP on offense was #82):

#13 Scoring Defense
#19 Total Defense
#22 Pass Defense
#27 Pass Efficiency Defense
#28 Rushing Defense
#10 Tackles for a Loss
#72 Turnovers Gained
#49 3rd Down Defense
#98 Red Zone Defense


2011 (TOP on offense was #107):

#81 Scoring Defense
#71 Total Defense
#50 Pass Defense
#74 Pass Efficiency Defense
#83 Rushing Defense
#86 Tackles for a Loss
#49 Turnovers Gained
#73 3rd Down Defense
#83 Red Zone Defense




I'm much more worried about his 3rd down and Red Zone Defense than anything else. I think we will for sure have a top 25/20 scoring defense with this talent, position coaching, and TOP offense.
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
6629 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

TOP Ranks
102 - 2009
77 - 2010
104 - 2011

2009 - #25 Scoring Defense, #20 Total Defense
2010 - #13 Scoring Defense, #19 Total Defense
2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense

2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP.


The point was, his BEST defense rank (#13) also just happened to be the year his offense had their best TOP rank (#77). So yes there is some sort of correlation there. Where do you suppose his D would be if they had the #7 TOP offense like LSU had last year?

I think even the worst negatiger could answer that correctly.
Posted by Geaux Tahel
Member since Feb 2006
6629 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

I think we will for sure have a top 25/20 scoring defense with this talent, position coaching, and TOP offense.


And our 2 minute Defense can ONLY get better than it has been.
Posted by Sam1
la
Member since Dec 2008
813 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:44 pm to
Clemson recruiting 2007 17th, 2008 10th, 2009 31st, 2010 29th these are the classes he would have been delt...may help explain some of the performance.
Posted by Sam1
la
Member since Dec 2008
813 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:49 pm to
If you go look at those classes they were very week on the defensive side especially DB...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram