- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Truth about Clemson defense that Steele took over
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:32 am to nicholastiger
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:32 am to nicholastiger
This is going to be a wait and see hire. He will have better players for sure at LSU. I looked up how many NFL players were on Rosters from the 2011 Clemson defense and it's only 3 and only 1 guy a DL is any real contributor.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:37 am to lsufan1971
Clemson IS NOT LSU in terms of the defensive talent they attract...jus sayin.
This post was edited on 1/15/15 at 11:38 am
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:37 am to dreaux
quote:
There is just to many variables though to make a sound judgment call.
Like the fact that Clempsons Offense was ranked more than 100th in time of possession 2 of those 3 years.
Hard to have a good defense when it's on the field the ENTIRE season.
quote:
Saban liked him enough to bring him back though.
And Saban reportedly called him Tuesday morning begging him to stay... and "Don't get on the plane".
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:41 am to higgsBoson
did sweeney run a faster paced offense than bowden? cause thats when steele became the dc. i wouldnt think sweeneys offense is that great for overall defensive rankings.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:44 am to Tigahbader
quote:
Clemson IS NOT LSU in terms of the defensive talent they attract...jus sayin.
Neither are Vanderbilt or Penn State...yet, somehow, Bob Shoop was able to put together top 20 defenses at those schools.
Elite coaches don't require elite talent to make themselves look good.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 11:56 am to Geaux Tahel
quote:
Like the fact that Clempsons Offense was ranked more than 100th in time of possession 2 of those 3 years.
TOP Ranks
102 - 2009
77 - 2010
104 - 2011
2009 - #25 Scoring Defense, #20 Total Defense
2010 - #13 Scoring Defense, #19 Total Defense
2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense
2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP. They don't correlate here. Sorry.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:19 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:So your telling me that in three short years our D will suck like our O. That should keep from dividing the locker room.
2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:25 pm to etm512
quote:
2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP. They don't correlate here. Sorry.
People want to believe in excuses for a guy that just screwed it up. His defense was overly complicated, and just like Crowton, he'll do well or okay early (because he won't be able to completely shift to his complex scheme) and as time passes, his scheme will become to complex and players will struggle.
That is most likely what will happen given his history.
At the same time, let's look at Chavis' history at UTk before coming to LSU:
2004 - #38 Scoring, # 45 Total
2005 - #16 Scoring, # 7 Total
2006 - #33 Scoring, #50 Total
2007 - #61 Scoring, #70 Total
2008 - #10 Scoring, # 3 Total
Chavis was up and down, and two years before coming to LSU, UTk's offense carried him to an SEC Championship game despite a horrid defense.
Sometimes bad years happen, and honestly with Steele, you just don't have enough data. 4 years at 2 schools with none better than #19 in total defense is a bit concerning though.
This post was edited on 1/15/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:28 pm to tigerfoot
I get the past has some merit, but prior to LSU...
Nick Saban at Mich St.
1995 6–5–1
1996 6–6
1997 7–5
1998 6–6
1999 9–2
Les Miles at OSU
2001 4–7
2002 8–5
2003 9–4
2004 7–5
Neither records were really impressive, but they were the right 'fit' for the job and both did and are doing pretty good at LSU. And I haven't looked at their records after leaving the respective schools, but I think both schools have better records since they left. It's all about the right person and the right fit and the right situation.
Quit bringing up 70 points and this and that, and wait and see what he does HERE!!!
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:34 pm to I_Geaux_4_LSU
you post stats that are like the anti stats of Steele
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:34 pm to Geauxgurt
Guys, relax. Steele will have the very best defensive talent in the country at LSU. He has Orgeron and Raymond to help him shine. Coach O will once again have LSU dominating the line of scrimmage and getting after the qb(which has been sorely lacking under Chavis' watch). This is going to allow all the NFL talent DB's to actually make plays. At Clemson he had exactly one guy who went on to contribute in the NFL
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:42 pm to fierysnowman
quote:
Guys, relax. Steele will have the very best defensive talent in the country at LSU. He has Orgeron and Raymond to help him shine.
Who were his defensive assistants at Clemson?
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:45 pm to fierysnowman
quote:I thought he was a great recruiter?
At Clemson he had exactly one guy who went on to contribute in the NFL
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:51 pm to SATNIGHTS
quote:
They lost some good defensive players to the draft the year prior to the downfall so there's that.
uh, yea, that's one of the main jobs of the DC - to recruit talent to play in your defense.
If there's a big dropoff one year due to the NFL draft or graduation, it's the coaches' fault for not having young backups ready to step up.
Graduation and early exits for the draft are both predictable, to a large extent. Coaches get paid big money to anticipate that and prepare for it.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:19 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
I thought he was a great recruiter?
To be fair, it is mentioned in a Clemson article I read yesterday that Dabo didn't like him dedicating a lot of time to recruiting travel. At FSU he was National Recruiter of the Year when he focused on it.
He is apparently very organized as a recruiter and maybe he can pick the guys he wants, prioritize them, and sick O and Frank on them.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:22 pm to Geauxgurt
Just to add more stats to the thread for discussion:
National Rankings per NCAA's statistics database:
2009 (TOP on offense was #105):
#25 Scoring Defense
#20 Total Defense
#7 Pass Defense
#21 Pass Efficiency Defense
#67 Rushing Defense
#12 Tackles for a Loss
#11 Turnovers Gained
#64 3rd Down Defense
#114 Red Zone Defense
2010 (TOP on offense was #82):
#13 Scoring Defense
#19 Total Defense
#22 Pass Defense
#27 Pass Efficiency Defense
#28 Rushing Defense
#10 Tackles for a Loss
#72 Turnovers Gained
#49 3rd Down Defense
#98 Red Zone Defense
2011 (TOP on offense was #107):
#81 Scoring Defense
#71 Total Defense
#50 Pass Defense
#74 Pass Efficiency Defense
#83 Rushing Defense
#86 Tackles for a Loss
#49 Turnovers Gained
#73 3rd Down Defense
#83 Red Zone Defense
I'm much more worried about his 3rd down and Red Zone Defense than anything else. I think we will for sure have a top 25/20 scoring defense with this talent, position coaching, and TOP offense.
National Rankings per NCAA's statistics database:
2009 (TOP on offense was #105):
#25 Scoring Defense
#20 Total Defense
#7 Pass Defense
#21 Pass Efficiency Defense
#67 Rushing Defense
#12 Tackles for a Loss
#11 Turnovers Gained
#64 3rd Down Defense
#114 Red Zone Defense
2010 (TOP on offense was #82):
#13 Scoring Defense
#19 Total Defense
#22 Pass Defense
#27 Pass Efficiency Defense
#28 Rushing Defense
#10 Tackles for a Loss
#72 Turnovers Gained
#49 3rd Down Defense
#98 Red Zone Defense
2011 (TOP on offense was #107):
#81 Scoring Defense
#71 Total Defense
#50 Pass Defense
#74 Pass Efficiency Defense
#83 Rushing Defense
#86 Tackles for a Loss
#49 Turnovers Gained
#73 3rd Down Defense
#83 Red Zone Defense
I'm much more worried about his 3rd down and Red Zone Defense than anything else. I think we will for sure have a top 25/20 scoring defense with this talent, position coaching, and TOP offense.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:40 pm to etm512
quote:
TOP Ranks
102 - 2009
77 - 2010
104 - 2011
2009 - #25 Scoring Defense, #20 Total Defense
2010 - #13 Scoring Defense, #19 Total Defense
2011 - #81 Scoring Defense, #71 Total Defense
2 good defenses with 2 bad years of TOP and 1 bad defense with another bad year of TOP.
The point was, his BEST defense rank (#13) also just happened to be the year his offense had their best TOP rank (#77). So yes there is some sort of correlation there. Where do you suppose his D would be if they had the #7 TOP offense like LSU had last year?
I think even the worst negatiger could answer that correctly.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:43 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
I think we will for sure have a top 25/20 scoring defense with this talent, position coaching, and TOP offense.
And our 2 minute Defense can ONLY get better than it has been.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:44 pm to Captain Rumbeard
Clemson recruiting 2007 17th, 2008 10th, 2009 31st, 2010 29th these are the classes he would have been delt...may help explain some of the performance.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:49 pm to Chad504boy
If you go look at those classes they were very week on the defensive side especially DB...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News