Posted by
Message
lsutyger23
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
665 posts

The tackle on greedy by QB
Should it have been targeting???


I mean it woulda been a weak call and glad it wasn’t...but def was contact to head or neck area
This post was edited on 9/25 at 5:58 pm


drdoct
LSU Fan
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2015
297 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
IMO it needs to be considered as bad for punishment as targeting. He nearly ripped his head off. A facemask that bad should be auto ejection akin to fighting. But following the rules, no it's not targeting or anything other than 15 yd personal foul.


TigahTeeth
LSU Fan
Georgia
Member since Feb 2016
1117 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
Yeah I don't know how that doesn't warrant ejection. Nearly breaking someone's neck intentionally is just as egregious as targeting.


Number 31
LSU Fan
St. Tammany
Member since Jul 2016
4128 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
We should have gotten one free late hit to make up for it.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
110
CSATiger
LSU Fan
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
4651 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
another bad part, where the ball was placed LSU actually only got half a yard, half the distance


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
30
DaBike
Katy, Tx
Member since Jan 2008
3350 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
It wasn’t targeting by the rule. However it looked like he intentionally wrapped his arms around Greedy’s head and ripped his helmet off.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
40
Tiger_Stripes
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2013
402 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
That guy was a douche.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
230
S
Texas Southern Fan
America was already great, mane.
Member since Jan 2007
84983 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
Best part was Otto tOrange in the back w his arms up like "shit, mane"


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
20
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors
Advertisement
DeafVallyBatnR
LSU Fan
Fredericksburg, Va.
Member since Sep 2004
8788 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
They called targeting on FSU player earlier in the day for a lot less. Fore arm to the head.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
50
gumbeaux
LSU Fan
Little Rock, Arkansas
Member since Jun 2004
1609 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
While on the subject of bad calls, there was a classic horse collar in the 4the quarter that was not called. I forget the running back that was horse collared but it was on a critical drive and LSU could have benefited from the 15 yards.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
80
OldManRiver
LSU Fan
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2005
4555 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
I don't think you can have "targeting" on a player who is a deemed a runner. Targeting exists for defenseless players. But I may be totally wrong about that.


lrlafayette
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2017
110 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
Doesn't matter if you are runner or not targeting has been called on people just throwing blocks


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
deftones
SMU Fan
Austin, Tx
Member since Jan 2017
245 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
I thought the same thing when it happened......We protect the QB and WR but lack in protecting the defensive player like that of Greedy!


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
skullhawk
LSU Fan
My house
Member since Nov 2007
11226 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
It was definitely intentional. The broadcast didn’t make a big deal out of it which surprised me.

If Greedy did that to the qb, it would be discussed as naseum on every outlet.

Every bit as, if not more, dirty than most of the targeting I see.


deftones
SMU Fan
Austin, Tx
Member since Jan 2017
245 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
quote:

If Greedy did that to the qb, it would be discussed as naseum on every outlet.

Yes like the 2 BS call on us vs Moo St.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
TigerLunatik
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
7424 posts

re: The tackle on greedy by QB
quote:

I don't think you can have "targeting" on a player who is a deemed a runner. Targeting exists for defenseless players. But I may be totally wrong about that.

Actually, this is correct. I'm not sure why people can't understand this. Helmet to helmet is only considered targeting if the player is defenseless unless the defender uses the crown of the helmet, but it has to be very delibrate.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
10
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram