Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

The Annar computer rankings have LSU #12

Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:44 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26274 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:44 pm
ETA: Just so everyone knows, the Annar rankings ARE NOT part of the BCS...just a random computer poll out there that Massey follows

LINK


quote:

The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play.


1 Alabama
2 Oklahoma
3 BoiseState
4 Wisconsin
5 Houston
6 Stanford
7 Georgia
8 Oklahoma State
9 TexasA&M
10 Oregon
11 Nevada
12 LSU

Composite rankings (most of which are not included in the BCS): LINK

BSC breakdown: LINK
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play


wtf do they care about? 40 times?

ETA: nevermind

quote:

The rankings aren't a list of who the best football teams are from top to bottom but rather a list of what teams consistently outperform their opponents (and their opponents' opponents, etc.) average yardage stats
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 12:47 pm
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33962 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play.
so what the frick do annar rankings care about if they don't care about the game of football?
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13235 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:45 pm to
Well what does it care about?
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
How the hell are we between two teams we beat?

quote:

Annar Rankings do not care who won the game


Should be removed based on this reason alone.
Posted by stonedbegonias
Member since Jan 2010
11583 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
Damn Nevada is ahead of us, that sucks.
Posted by Coach D
Member since Oct 2010
1734 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
The Annar Rankings are calculated by comparing yardage statistics (yards per game, per rush attempt, per pash attempt, etc.) of each team with the average yardage statistics from their opponents defense and comparing these numbers recursively until all teams are "connected". The Annar Rankings do not care who won the game, what the score was, turnovers, injuries, game location or special teams play. The rankings aren't a list of who the best football teams are from top to bottom but rather a list of what teams consistently outperform their opponents (and their opponents' opponents, etc.) average yardage stats. Don't take it to mean that because team X is rated #7 and team Y is rated #28 that team X would be the odds on favorite to win a head to head matchup because football games come down to more than who gains the most yards. It's not better or worse than any other ranking system but rather is meant to give some insights on the overall strenghth of teams assuming the turnovers average out, key players stay healthy, kickers don't shank short field goals and most importantly red zone offense and defense.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
more like the Annal Rankings to me
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13070 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
when I looked at the "About Rankings" tab to see what in the hell this was I saw this...

quote:

The Annar Rankings are calculated by comparing yardage statistics (yards per game, per rush attempt, per pash attempt, etc.) of each team with the average yardage statistics from their opponents defense and comparing these numbers recursively until all teams are "connected".


I wonder what pash attempts are, thought about that and decided that annar ranking means squat.
Posted by Weizenman
Reserve
Member since Oct 2007
2075 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:47 pm to
These rankings are absolutely useless..they don't even take in account for the cheerleaders..
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 12:48 pm
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10186 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

more like the Annal Rankings to me


Posted by CajunRocks
Ruston
Member since Sep 2005
3403 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:48 pm to
So, is Annar a code name for Phil Steele?
Posted by Lackamoola
The Woodlands, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
124 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:52 pm to
Garbage in.....garbage out!!
Posted by ScoopAndScore
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
11960 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

The Annar computer rankings have LSU #12

Sounds about right.
Posted by rabend1
Denham Springs
Member since Nov 2008
257 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 12:54 pm to
There is a saying in statistics and computer programming, GIGO--Garbage In, Garbage Out.
One can design a statistical model or computer program to spit out just about any result one can imagine.

It's an interesting model, but obviously is severely limited.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram