- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So it ended up being a win/win For Ridley
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:00 pm
Because he would have been on the runner up team in college football, but now he is on a team that has a chance to win the SuperBowl, (The Biggest Game in football). Barring an injury he would have been one of the main players for LSU in the title game that ended up losing and now he may not even dress for the superbowl. Great future either way for him though, could end up being a 3rd down feature back like Faulk was.
4
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:01 pm to Tiger Nation 84
he didn't play today because of poor performance
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:04 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
he didn't play today because of poor performance
Unless you have a link, I really dont want to hear this... Everyone has bad games and it happens like that to everyone! Woodhead fumbled out of the endzone and it turned into points for the Ravens and he came back the very next kickoff and returned another. I really dont see this statement as valid...
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:05 pm to TigerBait1127
How do you go from playing a lot to being "unavailable" without an injury?
A fumble?
#39 almost cost NE the game with his fumble
Wow!
do you think that was a catch at the end of the game?
A fumble?
#39 almost cost NE the game with his fumble
Wow!
do you think that was a catch at the end of the game?
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:08 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
A fumble?
Yes, that's why he wasn't active.
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:09 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
I really dont see this statement as valid...
tell us then, why was he inactive today
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:12 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
tell us then, why was he inactive today
ok so I read a few articles that said this to be the case....
[link=(
)]https://www.sportsoverdose.com/nfl-players/stevan-ridley[/link]
This post was edited on 1/22/12 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:24 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
Unless you have a link, I really dont want to hear this.
he was a healthy scratch from the game. Fumbled in the last 2
Posted on 1/22/12 at 6:27 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
he was a healthy scratch from the game. Fumbled in the last 2
yea I really wanted to know so I searched for it and found this to be true...
my apologies
This post was edited on 1/22/12 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/22/12 at 7:31 pm to Tiger Nation 84
the frickin ravens handed the game to the pats. if the pats play like that in the sb they are gonna get rolled.
Posted on 1/22/12 at 7:35 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:Why even make this statement?
Because he would have been on the runner up team in college football,
quote:Everyone except LSU.
Everyone has bad games and it happens like that to everyone!
Posted on 1/22/12 at 7:40 pm to ApexTiger
I wondered why they didn't challenge the catch. It's worth a shot
Posted on 1/22/12 at 8:13 pm to FlatTownProdigalSon
quote:
Why even make this statement?
All I was saying that it worked out, not trying to bash at all
Posted on 1/22/12 at 8:32 pm to Tiger Nation 84
Is he released from the team?
Patriots release inactives: WR Chad Ochocinco and RB Stevan Ridley are OUT
LINK
Patriots release inactives: WR Chad Ochocinco and RB Stevan Ridley are OUT
LINK
Posted on 1/22/12 at 8:44 pm to sayYeah
quote:
Patriots release inactives:
Means they RELEASED the names of the players that will be inactive for that game.
He's still on the team.
Posted on 1/22/12 at 9:59 pm to GeauxTigers0107
I thought the ravens should have challenged the catch in the end zone for a touchdown. It was clearly a catch w/ a few stutter steps afterwards, then the ball was knocked loose.
Posted on 1/22/12 at 10:38 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
he didn't play today because of poor performance
Yes and no.
The two fumbles were in fact the reason he was inactive, and fumbling is indeed "performance"-related.
But aside from the fumbles, the rest of his performance factors have been quite good, which is why he had 39 carries for 210 yards in the final 3 games of the regular season, far more carries than any other string of games this season. In other words, he has been performing very well OVERALL, and the fumbling problem will be dealt with next summer at camp.
Faulk had notorious fumbling problems in his first two seasons, losing 6 out of 9 of them. But he's still there in N.E., in his 13th season, hoping for a 4th SB ring.
BB likes Ridley - he'll be okay.
Posted on 1/22/12 at 10:45 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
do you think that was a catch at the end of the game?
if he had both feet down and control....catch.
Posted on 1/23/12 at 12:00 am to Cwar11
Coaches can't challenge in OT. It has to come from the replay booth.
Posted on 1/23/12 at 1:03 am to Gravitiger
game didn't go to OT
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News