Started By
Message

re: Should Jarret Lee have played?

Posted on 10/5/09 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by Dijkstra
Michael J. Fox's location in time.
Member since Sep 2007
8738 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

AlejandroInHouston


I don't care what anyone says. While harsh, that was one of the funnier things I've seen today. GG.
Posted by 36 Chambers
Retard
Member since Sep 2009
400 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 2:57 pm to
quote:


I don't know about the rest of you, but at one point late in the 3rd quarter I was hoping they would put Jarret Lee in at QB so Jefferson could compose himself


Yes, because Jarrett Lee + porous OL - run game = good things.
Posted by iheartlsu
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
27726 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 2:59 pm to
And what have you seen from Jarrett Lee that says he is composed in big games?
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:07 pm to
In a slugfest with GA, you don't put in the back-up. JJ lead us on the two TD drives to win the game, and disrupting the flow of QB in this game would not have been helpfu. He made one mistake (big one in the interception) but makes few mistakes.
Posted by floridachad
orlando
Member since Sep 2008
205 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:11 pm to
If they would have put JL in I would have seriously shat myself...Jefferson was doing just fine...the game was within reach...he didn't score the touchdown for Georgia...Georgia did and our defense let them do it...
Posted by gxlfnut
BIG B R
Member since Oct 2005
2928 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:13 pm to
yes, two or three plays only
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:26 pm to
I have no idea how JJ has earned so many detractors.

I love that dude.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

AlejandroInHouston



Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22791 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:29 pm to
Easy answer... NO!
Posted by StarkvilleTigerFan
Muncie, IN
Member since Jan 2005
3939 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:30 pm to
I think they should have JL in for at least 2 series a game-it would not hurt and besides-if he has to suddenly come in , he has a feel for the other team already. its stupid not to allow him the chance-if they are going to use RS-they need to use JL as well
Posted by uneaux
constantly changing
Member since Aug 2009
921 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Should Jarret Lee have played?



What did the five fingers say to the face?


Posted by Leonides
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
1270 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:31 pm to
I think Lee should have been worked in for a series or two each game, but the 3rd quarter against UGA was not the right time. With the offensive line unable to control the UGA pass rush, Lee would have been a sitting duck due to his lack of mobility.
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27217 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:33 pm to
I just punched myself in the face for not anchoring this thread earlier today. So much for thinking something this damm stupid would have died.
Posted by ntztgr
mississippi
Member since Oct 2005
1755 posts
Posted on 10/5/09 at 3:39 pm to
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram