Started By
Message
locked post

SEC West tie breaker question

Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:37 pm
Posted by xavierTIGER
Black Pearl
Member since Jan 2007
2203 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:37 pm
I've seen a lot of people say that Auburn needs to lose 2 games in order for LSU to make it to Atlanta. but, if we win out and Auburn's only loss is to a one loss Bama team, that would leave LSU, Auburn, and Bama all with one SEC loss (each to an SEC west opponent). if I remember correctly, the tie beaker comes down to each team's BCS standing. am I correct in this rule? if so, is it possible that LSU could make it to the SECCG with auburn only having one loss?
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
11875 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:37 pm to
Alabama would have 2 losses (USC and us)
Posted by Brown Mountain
Covington, La
Member since Feb 2006
8014 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:38 pm to
There will be a loser this weekend
Posted by WelcomeToDeathValley
1st & 1st
Member since Aug 2006
16947 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

if I remember correctly, the tie beaker comes down to each team's BCS standing


thats the last resort, all other tiebreakers have to fail for BCS ranking to come into play

quote:

Auburn's only loss is to a one loss Bama team


Auburn goes because they have the direct win over LSU.
This post was edited on 11/4/10 at 2:40 pm
Posted by athletemed
The Woodlands, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:39 pm to
If LSU and Auburn each have one loss...

say Aubie loses to Bama....

11-1

LSU LOST to Aubie....11-1...

Aubie wins cuz they beat LSU
Posted by xavierTIGER
Black Pearl
Member since Jan 2007
2203 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Alabama would have 2 losses (USC and us)


shite...that's right. brain fart. well it is conceivable, even if it is a remote chance, that all 3 of us would have 2 losses. that would mean Auburn loses to UGA and in the iron bowl and Bama loses to us (with a previous loss to USCe). since both AU and UA would have one SEC east loss, how would that affect the tie beaker scenario?
This post was edited on 11/4/10 at 2:53 pm
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21664 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

since both AU and UA would have one SEC east loss, how would that affect the tie beaker scenario?


In this scenario (let's say LSU wins this weekend, then loses to Arky; Bama beats Auburn, UGA also beats Auburn), I'm pretty sure LSU would be the first team eliminated from the 3 team tie because they would have 2 west losses, while Auburn and Bama would only have 1. Then the tiebreaker starts over with Bama going over Auburn because of the head to head win.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10186 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

In this scenario (let's say LSU wins this weekend, then loses to Arky; Bama beats Auburn, UGA also beats Auburn), I'm pretty sure LSU would be the first team eliminated from the 3 team tie because they would have 2 west losses, while Auburn and Bama would only have 1. Then the tiebreaker starts over with Bama going over Auburn because of the head to head win.


You are correct. There's no scenario that gets us the West at this point short of:

1) Auburn losing 2
2) Us winning out

However, if that happens, the sky's the limit!
Posted by Tiger_in_Texas
Houston
Member since Jul 2005
621 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:15 pm to
LSU needs to avoid tiebreakers they are not good for LSU. LSU needs to win out and Auburn lose two games. Then LSU West Champ.

Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10186 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:17 pm to
If we want to be like Ole Miss, we control our own destiny in the race to fly the "co-divisional champion" banner.
Posted by TigerBandAlumnus82
Pensacola,FL
Member since Jul 2007
3104 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Aubie wins cuz they beat LSU

Well, even though the Chavis no pressure-no blitz-soft zone defense couldn't slow down Newton, we did manage to hold them to only 24 points. However, the Milescrowzalesjefferstein
Monster offense was it's sure dependable self. (Shite, even Ole Miss put up 31 on Auburn).....
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

If we want to be like Ole Miss, we control our own destiny in the race to fly the "co-divisional champion" banner.

Great...moral victories.
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

if I remember correctly, the tie beaker comes down to each team's BCS standing. am I correct in this rule?


Yes, but only if higher priority tiebreakers don't decide it first. If LSU were to beat 'Bama for its only loss (i.e., if 'Bama had beaten SC), and 'Bama beat Auburn and Auburn beat LSU, so all 3 had one loss and head-to-head didn't resolve it in that case, it would go to BCS standings. However, as others have pointed out, this scenario can't happen, because 'Bama already has 1 loss and would have 2 losses in order for LSU to remain at 1 loss, in which case it would just be LSU and Auburn, and head-to-head would determine it.
This post was edited on 11/4/10 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Gold Tiger
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2008
785 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

shite...that's right. brain fart. well it is conceivable, even if it is a remote chance, that all 3 of us would have 2 losses. that would mean Auburn loses to UGA and in the iron bowl and Bama loses to us (with a previous loss to USCe). since both AU and UA would have one SEC east loss, how would that affect the tie beaker scenario?


Does your off color remark make you feel like a big man? I hope you are able to reply to your next poster with a little more class.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81645 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Does your off color remark make you feel like a big man? I hope you are able to reply to your next poster with a little more class.


Huh?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84900 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Does your off color remark make you feel like a big man? I hope you are able to reply to your next poster with a little more class.


Huh?
Posted by MrCoachKlein
Member since Sep 2010
10302 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:28 pm to
?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84900 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:31 pm to
What I don't understand is that the SEC website says this regarding a two team tie:

A. Head-to-head competition between the two tied teams;

B. Records of the tied teams within the division;

C. Head-to-head competition against the team within the division with the best overall (divisional and non-divisional) Conference record, and proceeding through the division (multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last and a tie for first place will be broken before a tie for fourth place);

D. Overall record against non-divisional teams;

E. Combined record against all common non-divisional teams;

F. Record against the common non-divisional team with the best overall Conference record (divisional or non-divisional) and proceeding through other common non-divisional teams based on their order of finish within their division; and

G. The tied team with the highest ranking in the Bowl Championship Series Standings following the last weekend of regular-season games shall be the divisional representative in the SEC Championship Game.

But, when would you have to EVER go beyond head to head?

Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81645 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

when would you have to EVER go beyond head to head?
That gives me monkey head.
Posted by thanksjhester
Sonic
Member since Jun 2009
5411 posts
Posted on 11/4/10 at 9:57 pm to
Auburn would be a half game ahead of LSU and would go to seccg
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram